<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Epicurean, Epidurean&#8230;paradoxes everywhere!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.xanthippas.com/2008/02/24/epicurean-epidureanparadoxes-everywhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.xanthippas.com/2008/02/24/epicurean-epidureanparadoxes-everywhere/</link>
	<description>A place for raw, uncensored ideas to be hurled about, recklessly...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xanthippa</title>
		<link>http://blog.xanthippas.com/2008/02/24/epicurean-epidureanparadoxes-everywhere/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xanthippa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xanthippaschamberpot.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps this is a big blind spot I have, but....how could I buy into a philosophy, when I fail to see any reasons for even formulating its underlying premise...not for lack of trying, mind you!

A degree of something is not its own opposite...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this is a big blind spot I have, but&#8230;.how could I buy into a philosophy, when I fail to see any reasons for even formulating its underlying premise&#8230;not for lack of trying, mind you!</p>
<p>A degree of something is not its own opposite&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tequila Socrates</title>
		<link>http://blog.xanthippas.com/2008/02/24/epicurean-epidureanparadoxes-everywhere/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tequila Socrates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xanthippaschamberpot.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Xan,

I am looking forward to more about what you don&#039;t by about dualism!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Xan,</p>
<p>I am looking forward to more about what you don&#8217;t by about dualism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xanthippa</title>
		<link>http://blog.xanthippas.com/2008/02/24/epicurean-epidureanparadoxes-everywhere/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xanthippa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xanthippaschamberpot.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for the comment...these are things people have been pondering for millenia...

Yes, there are many explanations for why childbirth is painful...most polytheistic pagan mythologies have one or more (not necessarily congruent ones).  But, just as the pantheons and mythologies differ, so do the explanations and attitudes.

I agree with you:  the &#039;divine attitudes&#039; you describe would much better correspond to reality than monotheism would.  

In addition, most monotheisms introduces the concept of dualism - something that really, really annoys me....  Either I am missing something really basic about the whole dualist mystique, or I really do understand the premise and am having a hard time understanding how come so many people are buying into it...

However, it is important to stress that the goal of Epicurus&#039; questions was not to contrast the idea of monotheism versus polytheism:  he was an unabashed disbeliever in all &#039;supernatural&#039;.  This included all forms of deities, any notion of an immortal soul, and so on.  And while he could accept polytheism as (modern terms) expression of archetypes, his body of teaching leaves little doubt that he did not interpret religion literally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comment&#8230;these are things people have been pondering for millenia&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes, there are many explanations for why childbirth is painful&#8230;most polytheistic pagan mythologies have one or more (not necessarily congruent ones).  But, just as the pantheons and mythologies differ, so do the explanations and attitudes.</p>
<p>I agree with you:  the &#8216;divine attitudes&#8217; you describe would much better correspond to reality than monotheism would.  </p>
<p>In addition, most monotheisms introduces the concept of dualism &#8211; something that really, really annoys me&#8230;.  Either I am missing something really basic about the whole dualist mystique, or I really do understand the premise and am having a hard time understanding how come so many people are buying into it&#8230;</p>
<p>However, it is important to stress that the goal of Epicurus&#8217; questions was not to contrast the idea of monotheism versus polytheism:  he was an unabashed disbeliever in all &#8216;supernatural&#8217;.  This included all forms of deities, any notion of an immortal soul, and so on.  And while he could accept polytheism as (modern terms) expression of archetypes, his body of teaching leaves little doubt that he did not interpret religion literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tequila Socrates</title>
		<link>http://blog.xanthippas.com/2008/02/24/epicurean-epidureanparadoxes-everywhere/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tequila Socrates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xanthippaschamberpot.wordpress.com/?p=18#comment-76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice.  To me, the polytheistic view of divinity seems to encompass the real world better.  It seems a bit less anthropocentric, with the gods carrying through with missions of their own that are sometimes benevolent to humans and sometimes malovolent.  Of course, is it really malevolence or benevolence when the Gods are acting on their own behalf, barely heeding the existence of human beings.  Not sure... but in any case, I wonder if there are any explanations in polytheistic mythology of why childbirthing hurts so much?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  To me, the polytheistic view of divinity seems to encompass the real world better.  It seems a bit less anthropocentric, with the gods carrying through with missions of their own that are sometimes benevolent to humans and sometimes malovolent.  Of course, is it really malevolence or benevolence when the Gods are acting on their own behalf, barely heeding the existence of human beings.  Not sure&#8230; but in any case, I wonder if there are any explanations in polytheistic mythology of why childbirthing hurts so much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

