Day 1′s events can be read here.
Day 2′s events can be read here.
Day 3’s events can be read here.
Today, Mr. Warman was being cross-examined by Ms. Kulaszka.
It seems that, over the years, Mr Warman had instigated or filed well over 70 lawsuits – and is very comfortable on the witness stand.
He continues to paint Ms. Kulaszka as a nazi-lawyer, sort of like a ‘mob lawyer’, and thus casts her clients as nazis and bad people in the eyes of the jury.
For all her great intelligence, Ms. Kulaszka is not a good orator. Even the judge had difficulty following her questions at times and was asking for clarification. After Mr. Warman would answer a question, she’d make minutes long pauses before acknowledging the answer…
Mr. Warman appeared to be trying to help her, and won much sympathy from the jury.
Half an hour into the afternoon session, I could not take it any more and I left.
EDIT: during day 7 of the trial, the number of lawsuits initiated by Mr. Warman was said to be 69, which M. Katz side disputed by pointing out that some were multiple lawsuits against the same people but some were lawsuits with multiple defendants.
Also, I would like to clarify that the means through which Mr. Warman painted Ms. Kulaszka as a ‘nazi-lawyer’ was by name dropping and smearing, not through direct accussations.