And this was the night that the fate of ‘Obama’s legacy’ was sealed

The de-colonization of science. Really…

Tucker Carlson Judge Andrew Napolitano Discuss Trump Supreme Court Pick Neil Gorsuch

The end does not justify the means: but the means always define the end

So – a sad day yesterday, the 29th of January, 2017.

Somebody walked into a mosque in Quebec City and opened fire, killing at least  6 people and injuring many more.

That is NOT OK!

It does not matter how much you are frightened by militant Islamic supremacists, taking the law into your own hands is never OK.

No end justifies the means.  To the contrary, the means always define the end.  People who want to commit violence (or any form of extralegal action) in the name of their ideology should always keep this in mind!

So, whether the shooter was a nationalist supremacist, or a Muslim convert who thought the mosque was not devout enough – murdering people is never justified.  That way, blood baths and all kinds of very, very bad results lie.

We live in a land where we have the rule of law.

OK – ours is a highly imperfect system, with many double standards, but that is because it is a human system and humans are imperfect beings.  Still, it is our duty as citizens to strive to make the rule of law the best it can be – to work within the framework of our laws to make imperfect human beings enforce the rule of law as best as we can.

My sincere sympathies are with all the victims of this horrible shooting and their families, friends and community.

I may disagree with the teachings of Islam, but I will never condone any form of extralegal action towards those who practice it – and no action whatsoever towards those who practice it peacefully.

And I will fight to the death for everyone to practice their belief system within the bounds of our laws, no matter what my personal opinion of the merit of that belief system may be!!!

 

 

Robert Spencer on CAIR’s Hussam Ayloush Longing for Infidel Deaths

Marion le pen attacks vestigial feminists in the French Parliament

US election fraud: Veritas Voter Fraud Compilation – #VoterFraudIsReal

Plus, this article  analyzing the HuffPo flip :

How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections.

QED

Edit:  fixed inaccurate description of link.