Unconscious woman “consented to rape”

Let’s get this straight:  if a drunk person consents to sex, it is not ‘rape’.  Because the decision to get drunk is in the power of the person giving the consent.

However, over the last 25-or-so years, the laws have been changed:  if a person (a female person, that is) is ‘intoxicated’, then she is ‘not competent to give informed consent’ to sexual intercourse.  Therefore, if an (equally intoxicated) male performs any sexual act (ranging from groping to actual rape), this is legally defined as ‘sexual assault’.

Not a particular fan of that law (because it is obviously misogynistic, as it states that an intoxicated female is less competent than an equally intoxicated male), but, this is the law of the land and until we can find legal ways to challenge it, it is binding on all members of our society.

Right?

Weeeeeeeell, not any more.

“It’s not rape when a Muslim does it!!!!”

 

Advertisements

Claire Lopez FULL SPEECH- CPAC 2017

Montreal imam calls for genocide of Jews, no problem. Send an ‘Islamophobic Tweet’ – go to jail, psychiatrist

 

Ii is important to point out that I do not thing this ought to be forbidden.  Not at all.  I think it is perfectly within his right to spew hateful garbage all he wants:  if his audience is not willing to listen, they can walk out.

What I do object to is the blatant double standard being exhibited by our rulers:

 

‘Nuff said!!!

Edit:  edited title for clarity

Four Orthodox Churches burned down on Orthodox Easter

Let’s count them and see…

Manhattan:  this happens to be a historic Serbian Orthodox Church.  Looking back in history, unless I am mistaken, the Serbs rose up in an uprising against the Ottomans rule on Orthodox Easter back in 1815.  And we do know how Muslim Terrorists fetishize ‘significant dates’…

Let’s go down under for the next two:  an Orthodox Greek one and a Macedonian one

Last, but not least, there’s one in Russia.

Is this a fluke co-incidence?

I think not…

The terrorists among us are literally burning down churches in our countries, and we still worry about ‘Islamophobia’?!?!?

Let’s call a spade a spade:  Islam is a totalitarian, supremacist ideology that preaches violence and terror and must be stopped in all its forms.  It is not possible to be familiar with Islam’s core texts, the Koran and the Sayings and Life of Mohammed, still call oneself a Muslim – and be a good human being at the same time.

All three are not possible at once!!!

It is time we stopped being afraid to say so.

H/T:  Vlad Tepes (a lot more to be found there)

 

 

 

 

What an Islamophobe!

Christopher Hitchens – Don’t Bow to Islam

We cannot be reminded of this often enough:

“Be Careful With Mohammed”: Muslim Action Forum launches “legal strategy” to stop publication of insults to Mohammed

From National Secular Society:

The Muslim Action Forum (MAF), which staged a protest outside Downing Street against Charlie Hebdo in February, has launched a “legal strategy” to stop insults against Mohammed.

The organisation is also asking supporters to “lobby your MP” to make “Islamophobia” a criminal offence.

They state that they intend “to launch a series of legal challenges in the English Court system” because “depictions of our Holy Prophet peace be upon Him is the worst kind of ‘Hate Crime’ that can be perpetrated on the 3 million Muslims in the UK and 1.7 billion Muslims worldwide.”

The group says that they have “devised a legal strategy to prevent the continuous insulting and derogatory publications depicting and abusing the personality of our Holy Prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him.”

In a press release published shortly after the demonstration in February 2015, the MAF set out details of their plan to outlaw depicting Mohammed in the UK, through “amendment of some existing legislation and the presentation of a Private Members Bill that promotes the idea of Global Civility.”

They describe “Global Civility” as a “new direction” and argue that the “desecration” of “collective human dignity”, through “insult, denigration or humiliation is morally and ethically wrong”. Their website rails against “reckless and malicious expressions”.

They urge the 100,000 Muslims who they claim signed their petition to lobby their MPs and all candidates standing in the General Election. The MAF makes a number of suggestions including three specific questions which they ask supporters to direct to their MPs.’

Well, that’s not good.

Getting 100 000 signatures?!?!?

I guess us blasphemers ought to prepare for being burned at the proverbial stake for now – and a literal one soon!