I love Canada. I am a proud Canadain. However, nothing is perfect – not even Canada. And it has made me ache to see my beloved country destroyed from the inside by the ‘tyrrany of the nice’. Of course, there is nothing ‘nice’ about this tyranny. It corresponds to ‘nice’ about as much as shadenfreude does to ‘pleasure’.
I speak of nothing else than the encroaching ‘fascism with a smile’. The thought police. And before most of us noticed, they have rotted the core of several of our legal institutions here in Canada – and are having a go in the USA, too. But, like a wart – the infection gets deeply sunk into the flesh before the outward signs are visible.
More and more Canadians have begun to wake up and smell the poison in our cups. Mostly regular people, who don’t understand why a person is not allowed to smoke a perfectly legal cigarette where a ‘privileged’ one can openly smoke marijuana. Or why a priest must never express his views – for the rest of his life – on issues like gay marriage. (Don’t get me wrong, I think it idiotic and immoral to oppose same-sex marriage. But somehow, I expect that many priests might have a different take on this – and that is their right.)
And since the calm, laid-back Canadians that we are actually began to discuss this at the watercoolers, coffe-shops and medical clinic waiting rooms (lots of people to talk to there), you know the winds of change are not far behind. So, how do our social engineers respond?
By sicking their ‘calming sqad’ at us.
I have trouble reading most ‘mainstream media’ print, because I love the English language and it pains me to see the abuse of grammar so routinely commited there. But, on occassion, people bring articles to my attention… as Blazing Catfur and FiveFeetOfFury have done here.
It is stories like these that make me question whether there is such a thing as ‘media bias’. That seems a singularly inappropriate concept – which implies that ‘bias’ is something that ‘could’ be a property of today’s journalism. Considering the ‘social engineering’ tone of ‘calming the populace’ this article takes, I think its aim is to educate us on what we ought to be thinking. How could that be referred to as bias?
It is not a ‘fluff piece’, as some seem to suggest. To the contrary. It is a well crafted educational piece, loaded with all the ‘proper’ buzzwords to ‘show us’ what we ‘ought to think’. To coddle us back into our woolly-headed sleepiness. Herd the sheep into the corale… That is the aim of the article – at least, in my never-humble-opinion.
Yet, it seems to have backfired. Perhaps it went too far in its tone of condescention, or perhaps it came too late. People were too awake to simply sink back into their slumber. The comments section reflects this, and is the most interesting part of this article. I, too, would have left a comment – but there is no way I’m giving my address to any organization that prints drivel like this!
Ah, yes. The comments section. Many of the comments point out that Mr. Warman, the much-admired subject of this article who often sues on behalf of others who – in his mind - ’ought to’ have been offended but were not (and who is one of the worst offenders the thought police has to offer) is suing ‘some bloggers’ (including FiveFeetOfFury and BlazingCatfur) because, somebody commenting on their site called Warman a ‘Nazi’ (I think).
What I am not entirely clear about is this: is he suing because he thinks that calling him a ‘Nazi’ is an insult to himself, or to ‘Nazis’???
It could go either way, you know….
Correction: Blazing Catfur is not, in fact, being sued by Warman (though she had been threatened with other suits). This was my misunderstanding. However, many pro-free speech bloggers are. I apologize for my mistake.
UPDATE: The Globe and Mail has not closed the ‘Comment’ section on the article I wrote about in this post. However, Blazing Catfur has taken some screenshots and these can be accessed HERE! I wonder if this is simply frustration on thier part, because their ‘education’ had backfired, or if someone had threatened them….