Count Dankula’s girlfriend bet him there was nothing he could do to make her pug ‘uncute’.
Challenge accepted: by the time she got home, Count Danculahad made a video in which the pug in question appears to make Nazi salutes to specific stimulae…
Ha-ha, joke achieved. Bet undecided – but joke achieved.
Millions of people watched the video – and all ‘got’ that being ‘Nazi’ = bad, and that making a cute pug mimic Nazi salutes is adorably silly. Poking fun at Nazis and all that…because EVERYONE knows that Nazis are hateful and having a cute pug mimic them is adorable, in a silly and innocent sort of way.
I would love to show you the video itself – because it was adorably silly and mocked Nazis at the same time, but I cannot: it seems that every copy of this video has been scrubbed from virtual existence…and since my computer recently failed and was replaced (before I could back up my downloaded videos), I no longer have a copy of it.
Please, allow me to assert (from having seen it first hand) that it was funny and adorable and totally making fun of Nazis, and NOT promoting them in any way, shape or form.
This appears to have been lost on the UK police AND judiciary.
Count Dankula (a self-described communist – none-the less) has been found guilty of ‘being grossly offensive’.
You read correctly.
‘Being offensive’ is now a criminal offense in the UK!!!
At this point, I would like to get into the whole argument how ‘saying/doing’ something is one thing, and ‘taking offense’ is completely different: one cannot control how others will ‘feel about/react to ‘ one’s speech or behaviour, because the reaction is completely divorced from the action itself.
But, I will not get seduced into that old argument, which, most of you – my loyal readers, are more than familiar with.
Instead, I will offer you Tommy Robinson’s reaction to the verdict – it speaks volumes!!!
This is because I have been very busy with working to achieve the goals promoted by this site from its inception through alternate means. And, I have been doing some serious ‘growing up’ in the process. But more on that later…
Today, I came across a post on reddit that I found most illuminating. However, between when I first clicked on it and the time I was ready to comment on it, it had been censored.
Gone down the ‘memory hole’…
Whatever the metaphor, it was made gone – as if the book-burners had had their way with it.
And so, my friends, with the permission of the author (a redditor by the name of ‘istillgetreallybored’), I bring you the banished, censored and book-burned post:
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE (this reee is dedicated in part to the cucked pedes who think they are alpha just because they voted for Trump)
They have to go back. Trump has reduced ISIS from 35k to 1k and the migrant crisis was a fraud to instigate a replacement program to further economic marxism as a means to controlling humans. We should have been helping (not causing the crisis would have been best) them in their country of origin which would have resulted in 100 fold cost savings and prevented this assimilation issue.
“How does Hanafi law characterize jihad? Hanafi law recognizes a series of primary rules (hukm taklifi268) that create obligations that impose duties. These primary rules (hukm taklifi) are based on a series of rights. Hanafi law recognizes three basic sets of rights and a fourth composite set: the rights of Allah, the rights of the individual, and the rights of individuals collectively (or of the state), and a fourth composite set of rights of Allah lying side by side with the individual – with the two cases of predominance of one or the other. From a hierarchical perspective, the rights of Allah (haqq Allah) take primacy of position.2″Pg140
The heart-war —- and that is the lowest form of the war. And it is that the Muslim should believe in his heart that the infidels are enemies to him and to his religion, and that he should desire their disappearance and the destruction of their power. And no Muslim can be imagined who is not under obligation to this degree of the war. Verily all the people of the Faith are under obligation to this amount without any question whatever, in whatever place they may be and in whatsoever condition they may be found. And that those concerning whom the exception made in the verse presented in the saying of the Most High holds good (You should abstain from them completely) to these it is permitted that they should be satisfied with this degree of the heart-war.3
Inbreeding depression in Delphinium nelsonii. A. Overall fitness of progeny cohorts and the B.progenylifespan were all lower when progeny were the result of crosses with pollen taken close to a receptor plant.
Inbreeding depression is the reduced biological fitness in a given population as a result of inbreeding, or breeding of related individuals. Population biological fitness refers to an organism’s ability to survive and perpetuate its genetic material. Inbreeding depression is often the result of a population bottleneck. In general, the higher the genetic variation or gene pool within a breeding population, the less likely it is to suffer from inbreeding depression.
Inbreeding depression seems to be present in most groups of organisms, but varies across mating systems. Hermaphroditic species often exhibit lower degrees of inbreeding depression than outcrossing species, as repeated generations of selfing is thought to purge deleterious alleles from populations. For example, the outcrossing nematode (roundworm) Caenorhabditis remanei has been demonstrated to suffer severely from inbreeding depression, unlike its hermaphroditic relative C. elegans, which experiences outbreeding depression.
Act! For Canada’s Ottawa chapter brought the iconic Dr. Jordan Peterson to speak at the main branch of the Ottawa Library.
And, luckily, we got Mrs. Tammy Peterson (a powerful intellect and personality in her own right) to give us a glimpse into how their lives have been altered since Dr. Peterson’spro-free-speech rant went viral in 2016:
Q&A videos to come as they are published.
For the record: Dr. Peterson WILL go down in the history books as THE Socrates/Aristotle/St. Thomas of Aquinas/Jan Hus/Gogol/Jung/Nietzsche+++ of our era – all rolled into one.
…but history will prove me right.
He will have turned out to be THE most influential thinker of our era. That much I am certain about.