New ‘Speech Codes’ for US Colleges…

 

Latest Pew Figures On Gun Homicide Rates

Pew is not exactly known as a right-wing group, yet their figures show a ‘startling’ trend:  gun homicide rates have been declining for decades:

‘National rates of gun homicide and other violent gun crimes are strikingly lower now than during their peak in the mid-1990s, paralleling a general decline in violent crime, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data.’

Gee, could that have something to do with the increase of ‘conceal-carry’ permits?

The consequences of the Obama policies in threat denial

This is a longer video than most, but well worth watching.

Sebastian Gorka is not the only one to speak up about this – Stephen Caughlin has also spoken out about the reality of the ideological purges in the intelligence community on many occasions.  However, Sebastian Gorka goes into the roots of the Obama ideology in a much clearer detail:

The following video is included as it focuses on he story of one of the victims of the Obama purges:

While I don’t agree with everything said, it is something to think about.

 

Reason TV’s Nanny of the Month for April 2013

FBI Fake Terror Plot History: Judge Napolitano

Thomas Sowell: The Incentives of Affirmative Action

 

Dzhokar Tsarnaev and his Miranda rights

I am not well versed in legal matters, much less US ones.  So, I found it baffling that it is permissible for US authorities to interrogate Dzhokar Tsarnaev without having first ‘Mirandized’ him.

A nephew of mine who was up last weekend from the US for the funeral of our aunt tried to explain to me both the legality and the logistics behind it.  Because of the family obligations the past weekend, I could not really track this down right away, but my nephew did point me in the right direction.  (Thanks, PJ!)

It seems that it boils down to this:  a person can be arrested and interrogated without having been ‘Mirandized’ and it is perfectly legal – it’s just that what the person says cannot be used against him/her in the court of law.  Here is an excellent legal analysis of this very topic.   (Via Popehat)

‘… But recall that under (1), the government is still free to question Tsarnaev outside Miranda as long as the government accepts the uncertainty of whether those statements would be admissible in a criminal case against him. Assuming that the evidence against Tsarnaev’s many different crimes over the last week is likely to be overwhelming, agents may not need any statements from him for a criminal case…’

 

 

EU parliamentarians consider emails from citizens to be spam

Just received this email – thought I’d share:

Friend,

If you complain about censorship to the European Parliament, they’ll just censor you.

That’s the message that concerned citizens in the EU have been receiving after the European Parliament’s IT department began blocking thousands of emails from citizens opposed to a controversial new policy (one that itself could have a serious impact on Europeans’ freedom of expression online).

And if we complain? I suppose they’ll block those emails too. So instead of emailing, help us make this petition go viral!

Everyone deserves a voice! Don’t let the European Parliament silence the people they are supposed to represent. Click here to take action and demand that they immediately stop blocking emails from their citizens.

Politicians need to know that silencing people’s opinions is not an option. Share this petition on Twitter and Facebook to make sure they get the message:

      

The censorship was uncovered earlier today by an MEP from the Pirate Party. Here’s his first hand account of what went down:

“Next week the European parliament will be voting on a resolution to ‘ban all forms of pornography in media.’ After this information became known to a wider audience, many citizens have decided to contact members of the European parliament to express their views on this issue … Before noon, some 350 emails had arrived in my office. But around noon, these mails suddenly stopped arriving. When we started investigating why this happened so suddenly, we soon found out: The IT department of the European Parliament is blocking the delivery of the emails on this issue, after some members of the parliament complained about getting emails from citizens.”

You can read his full account here.

Shockingly, this is not the first time this has happened. During the widespread outcry against ACTA, Parliamentary authorities decided to send all emails related to ACTA to MEP’s spam folders.

Tell the members of the European Parliament to do their jobs. Censoring opinions from concerned citizens is unacceptable and undemocratic. Sign the petition now.

Thank you for taking action against censorship. If everyone shares this petition and forwards this email to friends, we can generate enough outcry to ensure that the public’s voice is heard.

For Internet freedom,
Holmes, Tiffiniy, Evan, and the whole team.
Center for Rights / Fight for the Future

p.s. Protecting freedom of expression everywhere is what keeps us up at night. After you sign the petition, can you donate to support Center for Rights’s international anti-censorship efforts? Every contribution makes a difference!

Supreme Court of Canada says it’s OK to censor the truth, then re-publishes hate-speech

Sad…

H/T:  BCF

Reason TV’s ‘Nanny of the month – February 2013′

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers