The Quran and the Siege of Paris (David Wood)

The European crisis viewed by Czech man – part three – Final thoughts

As you might notice from my previous articles, I am trying to avoid using words “Migration crisis” too much. You also could guess how I see the present situation in Europe. Yes, there is a crisis in Europe. But it is not only a migration crisis. It is a global crisis of the whole European society.

I will start with one example from Army of Czech Republic (ACR).

There was a survey in HQ of ACR done by army psychologist. One of the private television stations got their hands on this material and published it.

It says that every 8th employee of ACR HQ causes potential security threat.


Because they have a critical point of view at foreign policy of our government and especially NATO.

How is it interpreted?

You might guess!

“Xenophobyia”, “Racism” and our favorite “Agressivity”.
Now let the numbers to talk.

There were totally 816 tested employees of HQ. The most employees think that the third most dangerous country to CR (Czech Republic) is the USA and 71% of them think that immigrants pose grave danger for Czech Republic!

And 71% of employees of HQ think that Islam is not acceptable at all.

I don’t want to hide information like official media do, so I will mention that from those 816 people, some would accept those common Islammic forms of punishment:
– stoning would be accepted by 47 people
– whipping would be accepted by 114 people
– cutting of hands would be accepted by 134 people
When you read this, ask yourself a few questions.

“Is that really true or just another attempt to discredit members of HQ?”

That is quite common practice. Someone says something that is not “truth and love” {the Czech counterpart saying to ‘sunshine an lollipops and singing kumbaya’}, he is descredited and then no one listens to him.

The favorite way is to blame him from having a child pornography. This works every time.

Another question might be: “Are their fears justified?”

Those guys have access to information from their own secret service, so it might be at least partially backed up by the truth.

And the final one? “If not only the most of common poorly informed people, but even the most of ARC HQ thinks that immigrants might be dangerous, why does the EU let theme cross the borders with no control?”

OK let’s calm down a bit.

Even Germany closed their borders to immigrants.

But the problem is not solved. There are still thousands of immigrants crossing borders of the Shenghen area.

As I mentioned few times before, I don’t trust official media anymore. But last month there were reported those things:
– Multiple fights between immigrants in Germany.
– Immigrants are making improvised weapons from metal parts of tables etc. and hiding them.
– Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban says that the immigrants are reminiscent of an army.

I would like to stop at the last one. Viktor Orban is the only prime minister that deserves to be the one. When he saw that immigrants are coming through his country like floods, he said “NO!”. He started to build a barbed wire fence along the borders with Serbia, where the most of immigrants were coming in from.

There were cca 230 people killed in a Russian airplane by bomb set up by Islamic State two weeks ago.

Over hundred people were killed in Paris few days ago.

One of the attackers was illegal immigrant who came to Europe through the Greek route.

And here we are now!

Is still everything OK, Frau Merkel? No, it is not!

But look at our media. There was one article with title: “We are in war with terror! Immigrants are on our side!”. It was telling us, that they run from the same enemy as we fear.

The IS.

I say: “Maybe. Maybe a few of them are.”

I can understand that Syrian family (e. g. a man, his wife and their three children) is running from a war.

But then there is a boat, where 2000 from 2300 people (source: Doctors Without Borders) in it are young men in age between 20 to 30. They are dressed in brand clothing and have smartphones?

Those are not refugees running from warzone.

They might be either economical “immigrants”, who want money from social system of Germany and Sweden, or members of IS, who will make terrorists attacks just like the one in Paris.

When this will be over?

I don’t know.

But current situation is quite bad. Not in Czech Republic, but few European countries are getting into serious trouble.

Netanyahu accurately describes the Mufti’s role in the Holocaust

Remember:  prior to the Mufti’s intervention, Hitler’s policy was to send all Jews to Palestine, their ancestral homeland.

Yes, he wanted to steal all their stuff, but he was willing to let them emigrate with very limited amount of their property.

Back then, the word ‘Palestinian’ was synonymous with ‘Jew’ – the Arabs were simply called ‘Arabs’.

It was not until the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem came to Hitler, began living as his honoured guest, and convinced Hitler that sending Jews to Palestine was ‘bad’ and that it was ‘better’ to just kill them that the ‘final solution’ had been drafted…and the Grand Mufti had been one of its chief architects.

Not only that, the Grand Mufti was also responsible for Hitler’s infatuation with Islam that had lead to his famous lament of mow much better it would have been, how much powerful the German race would have become,  if ‘strong Islam’ instead of ‘meek Christianity’ had been the heritage of Germany…

…I suppose Frau Merkel is trying to correct this error and set Germany on the path Hitler had only dreamed of…

And the Grand Mufti was responsible for the creation of numerous SS units made up entirely of Muslims, active in the Balkans and nearby regions.  If only our children were permitted to learn the truth about WWII history!!!

Well, here is someone who clearly does know history and the lessons it ought to teach each and every one of us – even if diplomacy constricts how he may phrase his words:

Bill Warner, PhD: Muslim Neighbors

A question – please answer, if you can!

Yes, I usually post my never-humble-opinions.

But this time, I know I would be out of my depth had I offered one….

Still, the question itself has kept me up on more than one night.

Granted, my early schooling came behind the Iron Curtain – so, perhaps the very premises of my question are flawed.  Yet, I have read enough (among the little bits of ‘H’istory that I have indulged myself in) here, in The West, that suggests to me that this question may, indeed, be more valid today than it has been in, well, almost a century.

Therefore, my dear reader, I beg you to indulge me in asking my question and, if you can, in enlightening me with the answer.

Thank you!

Now, for my long-winded question:

Before World War 1, the movement of peoples between nations was not regulated.

At least, it was not regulated in the manner in which it became regulated later on in the 20th century.

Yes, of course, there were border controls:  but these were meant mostly for economic purposes (import/export taxes) and to apprehend criminals.

After all, it was not so long ago that mainland Europe was still using the Feudal System of governance, where the freedom of movement of country folk was under complete control of their landlords.

And the aristocracy was not limited by borders:  crossing them freely and unencumbered to pursue political marriages.  The land they held was their only anchor to the kingdom in which they held it.

The craftsmen were also not anchored in place by ‘kingdom-governance’ (I cannot think of a proper term for this), but by the self-regulated guilds of their region, under which they were permitted to practice their craft:  guilds were built upon the apprentice-based artificially created scarcity of their products within various regions, calculated to ensure higher-than-market value of their work and thus inflating guild-members standard of living and social standing.

Similarly, scholars and artists moved freely between kingdoms, based on where they could find private patrons willing to fund them and their works.  (Note:  painters may be regarded as ‘artists’ today, but, prior to accessible photography, they were considered craftsmen and thus subject to the guild system.)  For example, consider the alchemical court of Rudolph the Second.

After centuries of feudalism, it took a bit from when the shackles were shattered to when people gathered the courage to reach for freedom and travel to far-away lands – not just to learn, or as a right of passage, but to settle for good.

At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, the human migrations truly became unfettered and populations began to migrate.

From my own cultural background – this is where the huge exodus of Czechs into Texas began:  so great was this migration that it was not until the 1970’s that Spanish overtook Czech as the second language of Texas. The University of Austin still has the largest Czech Studies department outside of the Czech Republic…  And don’t even get me started on ‘Miss Czech Texas’..

Yes, I realize that I am providing just one example here, but, I am no historian:  which is why I hope to get responses which will enlighten me.

Now that I have set the stage…

It has been suggested that one of the most important ‘behind-the-scenes’ reasons for the First World War was the absence of proper regulation on

the migration of populations across political borders.

Yes, of course – there were the ‘obvious’ reasons:  but I have heard the claim that these ‘obvious’ reasons were, in fact, brought about because of the cultural instability and tensions brought about by, in practical terms, unregulated migration of populations across culturo-political borders.

It would be difficult to argue that what we are seeing now, in the EU in particular and in all of Europe in general is exactly the same type of unregulated migration of populations across cutluro-political borders!

But, it is even more pointed now than what it had been prior to WW1:  at least back then, the migrations did not tend to cross religio-cultural borders – something that is most definitely happening now.  The new migrants flooding Europe, without any true governance, are not just politically and culturally different, they are also religiously different:  subscribing to an intolerant, supremacist religion that permits exploitation and violence against non-members of said religion and refuses to recognize any culture other than its own…

Finally, the question:

Are the current, practically unregulated migration conditions into Europe as dangerous, if not more, than the ones that sparked World War 1?

Umar Mulinde. He chose to live his truth, despite the threat from Islam.

The Unknown-The Day I Was Called a Woman by Islam

For more information on Islamic laws on marriage, please see my previous posts:

Marriage under Sharia, part 1

Marriage under Sharia, part 2

It is also important to note that the Islamic Prophet Muhammed said that men and children are not, under Sharia, required to cover their hair:  only women who are either available for marriage or married are to cover their hair.  It is the role of the father (or, in his absence, the female’s wali, or ‘male guardian’, since women are never considered independent humans under Sharia) to determine at which age she is available for marriage and that this guardian is to signal this availability to the Umma (the Muslim community) by ‘imposing the veil on her’.

While the customary age for this is 9 lunar years of age, under Sharia, the female’s wali is the one who decides her eligibility for marriage, regardless of physical age or maturity.  There is no lower limit and under some Islamic rulings, even an infant may be married off and her husband consummate the marriage – though if she is physically damaged by this, the husband will be responsible for her maintenance for the rest of her life (but she will not count towards his total of maximum of 4 concurrent wives).

And then, there is muta’a:  the temporary ‘pleasure marriage’… Of course, if the girl is young, under muta’a, it is her wali who collects the mahr ‘bride gift/price’… because while a woman is entitled to own property, under Sharia, it is her wali who controls it for her – as a proper guardian should.

Isn’t Sharia wonderful?  It can take something sordid and despicable and turn it into something virtuous that pleases Allah himself!


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 134 other followers