A bit ago, I wrote a post ‘Winning back our liberty: the ‘religious right’ threat’.
This was one post in a ‘Winning back our liberty’ series based on a ‘freedom of speech’ seminar I went to in December. Earlier posts included ‘Winning back our liberty: the ‘commercial’ threat’ and its afterthought and ‘Winning back our liberty: the ‘international’ threat’ .
It took me a long time to write this post – the ‘religious right’ one – because I was afraid that people on ‘the religious right’ would either not take it seriously – so I had to strongly support my point – or that they would focus solely on the ‘supporting evidence’ and miss my actual point completely.
Well, it seems that my fears were not misplaced. Please, just scroll down past the LEAF bit to get to where ‘Binks, the Webelf’ goes medieval on my post.
To say that I was disappointed would be an understatement.
And, ever since he posted it – a bunch of days now…hence no posts from me – I have been trying to compose a response to his criticisms.
However, I am having trouble with this. In my typical Aspie fashion, I get lost in the details: I wish to pick apart the fallacies in his reasoning, the errors or incomplete comprehension of the historical facts, or the misunderstanding/misrepresentation of some of the key concepts in the debate.
Either I get caught up in the minutiae.
Or I get sidetracked into correcting some serious errors in his statements.
Or I explain myself, but, I don’t think I support my arguments sufficiently.
Or – I accomplish all of the above….and my post is at over 10K words…so I delete the draft and start again.
I’ll have to work on this some more. In the meantime – any help would be appreciated!
P.S. I wonder if his remark about the ‘buzzing of a bee’ was an allusion to Gnostic Christian dogma, with which Binks, the Webelf knows I have been familiar with since early childhood. Because, if it is, it means at least another 10K-words-worth of a response will be required!