When ‘Coyright’ is ‘CopyWrong’!!!

Copyright.

So many people think that ‘copyright’ and ‘patents’ are necessary to protect artists and scientists and must be rigidly enforced in order to protect creativity.

Except that…

The WAY this is being done is so wrong, it actually HINDERS creativity and research and all that.

Do you know that doctors claim that the number one obstacle in, for example, the research to cure cancer, is patents?

No kidding!

This is because patents and copyrights are not being granted for things people invented, but for naturally occurring things that people happen to describe.

In the case of fight against cancer, the most infamous such patent is for the genetic sequence of breat cancer tissue:  the genetic sequence has been patented and nobody – absolutely nobody – is permitted to do any research on it without paying such ridiculously expensive royalties to the patent holder that it makes the whole process incredibly expensive…meaning most researchers cannot even touch it.  And, even if you had breast cancer and wanted to use your own tissue to do the research on – you would still not be poermitted to.

By the terms of that patent, you are not the master over your own flesh!!!

And, yes – it is, in no uncdrtain terms, the thin wedge of ‘technological slave-mastery’!

But that is a complex issue – which I invite you to due the due dilligence on on your own, because what you find is hard to believe if it comes second hand.

Here, however, is a very simple example of inapropriate copyright grant: pi.

Yes, the constant which is used to ‘calculate circles’!

Some guy had copyrighted the first 32 digits of pi, as set to music.  Not his arrangement (and he certainly was not the first to set pi to music), but ALL the arrangements of seting one of the best known constants in human history to music.

Listen and weep!

 

Pat Condell: ‘Let’s blame the Jews’

Nigel Farage (UKIP) 2011 in Germany: anti-EU, pro-Democracy

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

What is it with religious people and outrage over pictures?

Just to be thorough, let’s look at religions other than Christianity and Islam – for once.

Most religions come in many forms – from relatively liberal ones to insanely fundamentalist ones.  While I am willing to have respect for some religious practices (as long as they are strictly self-imposed by adult individuals), it is a serious mistake for a society to give a ‘carte blanche’ of ‘respect’ to all things religious.

Just because something is ‘religious’ does not automatically make it worthy of respect.

For example, there is a Hasidic Jewish sect living in New York which is so misogynistic, it forbids any and all photographs of women.

(To their credit – the women within this sect/cult have chosen to not hold a driver’s license rather than have their picture taken.  This is way more respectable than demanding that society accommodate them with a no-photo driver’s license, as some religious cults have done.)

This group puts out a ‘newspaper’ called ‘Der Zeitung’.

In this newspaper, they have published the now famous photo of Obama, Biden, Hillary Clinton and a bunch of other people ‘watching’ as the seals storm Osama’s hideout and kill him.  The catch is – they have removed from the picture the image of the two women present:  Hillary Clinton and Audrey Tomason (a staffer in the background).

Why?

“Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an impression of disparaging to women, which is certainly never our intention,” the Der Zeitung statement said.

Yes: to these religionists, ‘modesty‘ is more important than the truth!!!

Shame, shame, shame, shame!

This type of religion does not deserve respect – to the contrary.  Giving it even a pretense of respect is an offense to us, our culture and our laws.  It is no better than radical Islam or radical Christianity or radical facsism/communism/whatever-ism!!!

Now, let’s leave radical fundamentalist Judaism behind and turn our attention to Hinduism:  the religion that brought us ‘the suicide belt’ and pioneered the use of women in suicide bombings

Many Hindus are reportedly ‘outraged’ over a picture of the goddess Laksmi.

Noe, I am not a Hindu, nor am I an expert on Lakshmi – but I am a little bit familiar with her and her worship.  A friend of mine worships Lakshmi.  A few years ago, when one of ther daughters (roughly my age – a scientist with similar interest and personality to me) suddenly died, I stood in for her during a Laksmi-worshippping ceremony which my friend and her daughters had been planning before the sad event.  So, I have learned a little bit about Lakshmi in particular…  I rather like Lakshmi – think wise and loving and tolerant Shakti.

Which is why I was so surprised when so many Hindus were offended by pictures of Lakshmi – on swimwear!

Lakshmi is the goddess of wisdom and fortune and sharing and female sexuality!  A skimpy bathing suit is a perfect place for an icarnation of her image!  It is a uniquely empowering place for this particular goddess to appear!  Well, at least according to my admittedly limited knowledge of Lakshmi…

Still, even if it were not it good taste – which I think it was:  I do love that swimsuit! – Lakshmi is the goddess both of being charitable and of wisdom.  The designer meant well – she honestly thought she was honouring the goddess by including her image in her collection.  Lakshmi is also the goddess of material gain – both helping one earn it as well as guiding one on how to be charitable and perform charitable works.  The key is – she IS the goddess to pray to if you wish to make money….

Yet, those who are outraged say:

Lakshmi was meant to be worshipped in temples or home shrines and not for pushing swimwear in fashion shows for mercantile greed of an apparel company, Zed argued.

Dude!

She is the goddess of making money!!!

And of wisdom and understanding – so she would ‘get’ the good intent behind the bathing suit!

Plus, she is the goddess of beauty and channeling feminine powe!!!

All this makes me wonder if religionists can be trusted to even understand their own religions!  Rather, it seems to me that they wish to use it as a tool of coersion, to get power for themselves over others!

This face of ‘religion’ is definitely not worthy of ANY respect – EVER!

Ezra Levant: Bell’s bold bias

Hear it and weep!

This is what happens with government over-regulation.

Bell Canada provides cable/satellite channels to its subscribers.  It does so with a license from the Government agency, CRTC.

Bell Canada also owns and operates CTV – a news network.  It does this also with a license from the CRTC.

Rather than making it available by choice, however, the CRTC has decreed that every cable/satelite provider MUST carry the CTV news channel. and must make it available to its subscribers as part of the ‘basic’ package (the channels are bundled – a Canadian is not permitted to simply pay for the channels she wants, we can only buy a couple of ‘bundles’ of channels).  In other words, if a Canadian wishes to get cable/satellite TV, she MUST purchase Bell’s news channel. CTV – along with the government’s own channel, the CBC.

A new news channel started up:  Sun TV.  They are licensed by the same CRTC to operate in Canada and must adhere to its standards.

UPDATE:  I have replaced the original end of my post with this link to better researched details of what is going on.

H/T:  BCF

Assange: ‘My greatest enemy is ignorance’

Here is an interesting interview of Julian Assange by RT.

No wonder this guy is being hunted down:  he is speaking truth to power!

(Via Hacker News, I4U News and TNW)

Hacker News: Last chance to let the FDA know you want direct access to your own genome

A bit of a disturbing story, if you ask me:

‘Here’s what I suspect is really going on: The FDA is being pressured by the insurance industry to restrict consumers’ access to their own DNA because of the information asymmetry between the government’s preclusion of insurers ability to consider genetic data when determining eligibility and consumers’ recently available ability to cheaply know if they have a predisposition for a variety of potentially expensive or life-limiting illnesses. That the FDA is likely pandering to this industry under the dishonest guise of consumer health protection makes me more distrustful of it as an independent entity.

Disturing does not scratch the surface…

Boeing builds $2B plant – forbidden to use it

This is just beyond the pale!

To the best of my understanding, this is the order of ‘relevant’ events:

  • Boeing builds planes in its Seattle, WA, plant – in a unionized environment
  • in 2008, there is some labour unrest, during which Boeing publicly speculates about relocating the plant to a ‘right-to-work’ state
  • the Seattle plant is not relocated – to the contrary, it is running at full tilt
  • Boeing needs to make more planes and builds a new plant for $2Billion – locating in in South Carolina….which happens to be ‘right-to-work’ state
  • AFTER the plant is built and ready to hire 1,000 people, Obama’s National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) shuts the whole thing down because they deem it to be an anti-union move – and therefore ILLEGAL

That is right!

The plant is not ‘unsafe’ – for either the workers or the environment…

The labour unions are miffed that it is located in a state where they are not permitted to have a monopoly in the workplace:  so NLRB says that opening the plant would be illegal!!!

And you wonder why employers are not flocking into the US?!?!?

‘National Economic Suicide’ is a correct assessment:

The NLRB simply said that it could block Boeing from using the new plant as Boeing’s decision to locate it in South Carolina was in part based on a desire to avoid work stoppages and strikes, and this rationale was harmful to unions and thus an illegal act.

In related news:  at this point in time, there is not enough stuff – publicly AND privately owned – in the USA to pay off the US debt; perhaps it is now Mathematically impossible to pay the debt off!

Kaffir Kanuck: Fantino’s Billion Dollar Legacy

Read it and weep

Fantino is a big part of the reason why the Conservatives’ fortunes have seen a downturn:  the ‘law&order’ conservatives who form a core of his constituency are not pleased.  I suspect that if the Conservatives are returned to power in tomorrow’s election, it will be by a very different group of voters than originally.

Why would Harper associate himself with someone so despised in Ontario is beyond me…

The State itself, the government of Ontario has been repeatedly implicated in its interference in the application of the law against both the occupiers and the taxpaying citizen. Compliant and rebuked by Ontario courts have been the Ontario Provincial Police where their actions and inaction have allowed Canadian citizens to be terrorized.

On the 28th of February, 2006, early in the DCE development stage, trespassers who later were aided by anarchists, union agitators and activists hailing from the left spectrum of politics as partially detailed here by Gary McHale, occupied the DCE. The rightful owners, Henco Industries Ltd, who purchased the land from the Crown, were subsequently denied access by the new strong arm for Native protesters, the OPP.

UPDATE:  Part 2


There has been a deliberate attempt to silence the truth. The conspiracy of silence which has denied a voice to the real victims of the occupation will eventually come to an end.

… 

By refusing to acknowledge the pain of the victims, both native and non-native, victimizes the victims twice.

And this is why conservatives are disappointed with PM Harper for embracing Julian Fantino into the CPC…





He Who Must Not Be Named (on pain of litigation) is at it again…

You-know-who is suing people again – because he finds them ‘annoying’!

That little silly bunny will just not let up!

With his skinhead-like haircut and fascist tactics, he really does look like the member of a Neo-Nazi organization (Stormfront) that he is.  Yet, watching him in person for any length of time, the comparison to Uriah Heep (just before the 2 minute mark) crowds itself into one’s mind unheeded…

I don’t know how he can live with himself, that little tyrant-wanna-be silly bunny!