Trump is not a Democrat or Republican, he is a Mercantilist.

Prove me wrong.

Please, prove me wrong.

There is a lot to unpack with President Donald Trump. Some of it is good and some of it is bad. No, I am not fence-sitting, I am being realistic.

Mercantilism is a better economic model than what Biden’s administration put forth, but, it is seriously inferior to Austrian Economics – even opposed to them at times.

Heck, there is even a really good conspiracy theory (that will never be proven or disproven, because the surrounding data had been systematically destroyed for political reasons, which may or may not have anything to do with theories of economy) that the Austro-Hungarian Prince had been assassinated (leading to Franz Josef being the successor to the crown) precisely because he was a proponent of the Austrian model of economics (think Von Mises) and was planning to put these principles into play upon his rising to the throne.

Yeah, a while ago.

But, this is a valid direction to ruminate in, as Mercantilism was most alive just before then, and was being uprooted by ‘the Austrian School of economics’.

Rooting out inefficiencies and underhanded ways that taxpayer money has been handed over to partisan actors – that is a good thing.

But, the mercantilist mindset is a bitter pill to swallow – if you want to support President Trump.

The most (sadly) interesting thing – from a disinterested 5,000m perspective – is that President Trump’s political opponents are not attacking him on the things that they should: they are being petty and short-sighted, without laying out a reasoned opposition to his mercantilism. It is as if they are working from ignorance, not knowledge.

And that is sad, very sad.

Socialism vs Communism: what are the differences?

Growing up on the wrong side of the Iron Curtain, I got a first hand education on the difference between communism and socialism.

Yet, having arrived on the right side of the curtain, and seeing it fall down, I still studied this topic: what differentiates communism from socialism. And, it has been a life-long study – which brought me back to the basics, as I had been taught them, in a communist propaganda school.

Which they actually were truthful about.

Communism can only come around when all of the populace agree to this co-mingling of effort vs benefit. According to Marx, this would mean the State is no longer needed, as the populace will just do what is needed, without anyone telling/directing them to do so.

People will produce things – from food on up – because they want to, and they will not be paid to do so because they love doing what it is they are doing. In return, they will get goods from everyone else, because they too are giving the results of their toil away for free!

In other words, one is expected to work hard, to the best of their abilities – without ever reaping the benefits, as those are reaped by the greater society.

And that should be award enough.

The problem is that this might have worked in our earliest societies – which is what socialism/communism is trying to emulate, even though this does not scale up, as we have seen in history, over and over.

So, what IS the difference between ‘socialism’ and ‘communism’?

VIOLENCE.

Communism can only be achieved by having a 100% brainwashed populace that works towards ‘the common goal’ – whatever that goal is put forth from above.

Socialism is the step before communism: the children are in school, being brain-washed (I was taught it will take a minimum of 5 generations to ‘perfect’ the children), but everyone else has communist ideals imposed on them by force.

This is not frivolous speak – it is what we had been taught in school. Socialism requires force to be imposed, until people are brainwashed enough for the force not to be needed.

In other words, socialism is communism imposed by force.