Shafia: a follow-up rant

Now that I have ranted about the Sharia murders for a bit, I would like to offer you a rant on a slightly different aspect of this case…
THE most popular post I have ever written was about Aisha Ibrahim Dhuhulow.  OK, I have written several, but this one has been to slowed down over the years even though I wrote it up just days after Aisha (or, Aisho, in some spellings) was stoned to death under Sharia, for the crime of having been gang raped.  (As I could not find any picture of Aisha, I painted one.)
Clarification:  the Shafia murders were not, in any way-shape-or-form, Sharia killings!  Quite to the contrary – most pro-Sharia Muslims strictly condemn this ‘honour crime’.  What must be understood that ‘honour killings’ are culture-based (or, more accurately, a symptom of the tribal version of collectivist societies where individuals have not just no rights, but no identity of their own – only the clan/tribe has an identity and the people within it are treated as interchangable cogs), not religion based.  Indeed, most Muslim organizations in Canada, whether pro-Sharia or not, have condemned these murders as unacceptable – and that is a good thing.  However, it should not be misunderstood that under Sharia, these girls and women would have fared much better:  the outrage among the pro-Sharia crowd is because the family made the life-and-death decision rather than presenting their case to the Sharia courts and then submitting the children and women to the death sentence once the Sharia court pronounced them.  Plus under Sharia, these women and children would have been stoned, not drowned…  And, yes, they would not have escaped the death sentence, as one of them actually married without het father’s permission and the other 3 helped her, so under Sharia, they would have been sentenced to death by stoning or lashing.  The only disagreement here is between who has the authority to kill them:  their imam or their father.

What really, really got me angry was not only what had happened to the poor child, Aisha Ibrahim Dhuhulow (she had reported her rape to the authorities, not realizing that the regular Muslim authorities she had grown up with had been replaced by Al-Shabaab’s radicalized Sharia courts and that reporting she had been raped would earn her the death penalty by stoning), though that was horrific enough.
What added insult to the injury was how it was reported and treated by the ‘Western media’, lead by AP (whose reporter was an eye-witness to the stonitself).
The lead was:  WOMAN IS STONED FOR ADULTERY!
WOMAN?!?!?!?
IN WHAT UNIVERSE IS A 13-YEAR-OLD ‘A WOMAN’?!?!?
And now, in the Shafia case, the youngest victim, Geeti, was also 13-years-old…yet the headlines proclaim ‘4 women dead’!
Really?
13-year-old Geeti and 17-year-old Sahar were both minors. 
Children.
Not women!!!
Yes, murders of women are vile and despicable – all murders are.
But the murders of children – and murders of children by their parents – murders of children are extra vile.
Consciously or not, whether to minimize the impact for politically correct reasons or because they are having trouble wrapping their brains around the evil of it, by calling two children ‘women’, the crimes committed agains them are downplayed by the media.
Contrast that with how Omar Khadr is being portrayed by the media:  in order to whip up inflammatory feelings, the media are calling him a ‘child soldier’ – even though, under UN definitions, Omar Khadr (at 15) was neither a child, nor a soldier.
OK – Sahar was 17 and could be considered to be ‘a woman’ under some rules.  But, if the media treats the 15-year-old Khadr as ‘a child’ but treats the 13-year-old Geeti as an adult, I call it a double standard!
One which, I suspect, is strategically adopted by those who simply find suffering of Muslimas to not fit comfortably into their own world view, so they will do all that is in their power to sweep their suffering under the rug, turn a blind eye to and and, most importantly, not permit any objective discussion of it in the public square.
Yes, there is so much more I want to say about this, but I suspect that my rant would only get more ranty…so, let me just leave you with a paraphrased quote from one of my favourite philosophers:  a person’s a person, no matter how small, or female, or Muslim!

Individual Rights Party of British Columbia is getting more press attention

It is difficult for new parties to get themselves known well enough for voters to consider them to be a valid choice.  That is why it is good to see that the Individual Rights Party of British Columbia is getting some good press.

This latest article is at The Eaminer, by Walker Morrow.

Why is SOPA not part of the evening news?

Perhaps because most of the parent companies of TV news broadcasts are staunch supporters of SOPA:

‘Dimiero based his report on Lexis-Nexis searches which includes transcripts of nighttime newscasts.

Comcast/NBCUniversal (which owns MSNBC and NBC News), Viacom (CBS), News Corporation (Fox News), Time Warner (CNN) and Disney (ABC) are all listed as supporters of the bill. ABC and CBS are also listed as separate supporters of the bill.’

Just in case you were wondering why TV news is igniring this, if it is such a hot topic…

Isn’t a lie of omission still a lie, when it comes to building up trust in your news-sources?

Or is it unreasonable for us to expect news reporters to report news honestly and thoroughly, regardless of how it affects their corporate owners?  Because if we cannot, we must openly realize this and re-categorize ‘news reporters’ as ‘corporate spin officers’ and view all they say through the appropriate lens…

…and people wonder why the legacy media is in its death-throws…

Tommy Robinson tells details of how he was attacked by Islamists – again

Ezra Levant: Bell’s bold bias

Hear it and weep!

This is what happens with government over-regulation.

Bell Canada provides cable/satellite channels to its subscribers.  It does so with a license from the Government agency, CRTC.

Bell Canada also owns and operates CTV – a news network.  It does this also with a license from the CRTC.

Rather than making it available by choice, however, the CRTC has decreed that every cable/satelite provider MUST carry the CTV news channel. and must make it available to its subscribers as part of the ‘basic’ package (the channels are bundled – a Canadian is not permitted to simply pay for the channels she wants, we can only buy a couple of ‘bundles’ of channels).  In other words, if a Canadian wishes to get cable/satellite TV, she MUST purchase Bell’s news channel. CTV – along with the government’s own channel, the CBC.

A new news channel started up:  Sun TV.  They are licensed by the same CRTC to operate in Canada and must adhere to its standards.

UPDATE:  I have replaced the original end of my post with this link to better researched details of what is going on.

H/T:  BCF

DU: Christianne Amanpour said Osama bin Laden lived in a villa in Pakistan 3 years ago

Well, well, well!

I guess bin Laden’s locations wasn’t such a secret…

And nobody had to waterboard her for it, or anything!

Posted in society. Tags: , . 3 Comments »

National Post does not acknowledge ‘bloggers’ were source of its story

Long gone are the days of the investigative reporter.

Now, we have ‘journalists’ and ‘commentators’.

Much of their time is spent going over press releases and spinning these into politically correct stories that promote their corporate owners’ messaging.  At least, that is what it seems like!

Sure, there are a some very bright exceptions – but these are few and far between.  Still, most journalists these days are more interested in presenting their credential at cocktail parties and at snap poetry readings than they are at actually doing investigative reporting or writing unpopular truths.

At the same time, the Corporations that own the Media – as well as many ‘champagne journalists’ – are complaining that the blogosphere often cites them as sources of stories and links back to them.  They call this ‘stealing their material’ – and claim this is why their business model is dying:  because they pay journalists to write a story, then bloggers will summarize it in their posts so nobody will pay for their newspapers…

Except that – the ‘blogosphere’ convention is to link back to the source – thus driving traffic to the source site, which translates into advertizing revenue!  So it is hardly the ‘poaching’ that the Corporate Media makes it out to be…

Now, the situation is reversed: National Post, one of the major Corporate Media newspapers, has lifted a story that was first broken (a week earlier) by SassyWire and spread by BlazingCatFur, who actually went and did a few follow-ups .  Except that, unlike bloggers – who cite their source and list the relevant links – National Post and its Journalist Bell did not even mention that it was not their crack Journalist Bell who broke the story, but a blogger!  No mention, not link-backs, no nothing:  leaving its readers under the impression that it was they who did the work!!!

My, my – naughty, naughty!!!

And more than a little dishonest…