This video is loosely related to that famous speech by Margaret Thatcher where she unmasked the leftists hypocrisy on wealth: that caring about wealth distribution, the size of the difference between the very rich and the poor in any given country is politics of envy and hate of wealth, because it says nothing about the state of the poor themselves. After all, if the poorest people in a society are not hungry, cold or unhealthy, what does it matter how rich the rich are?
What exactly is Political Correctness?
What is Critical Theory?
Why do feminists attack European/Christian/Jewish misogyny, but no other form?
Why is the American brief history of Slavery the only form condemned by modern inteligentsia?
I have written a little about this, and the one and Only CodeSlinger has not only widely commented on the topic, but also guest-posted ‘What is Cultural Marxism’.
If you prefer the answers in a video format, here is a very accessible summary (saying much of what CodeSlinger’s post several years ago explained) by PJ Media’s Bill Whittle:
Reference: Serenity (a most excellent movie from the Firefly universe – I’ve seen it many times and highly recommend everything Firefly related!!!)
Surprise, surprise: yet another enemy of real food attacks the traditional diet…
What is interesting in this article (and makes it worth reading) is this bit:
In 2009, former editor–in–chief of the New England Journal of Medicine Marcia Angell admitted that the “evidence-based” studies published in her former publication and most other “scientific” journals are totally unreliable:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
In her bombshell article, Drug Companies and Doctors: A Story of Corruption, she documents how doctors and scientists are bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
“Clinical trials are also biased through designs for research that are chosen to yield favorable results for sponsors,” she writes.
Yet more evidence pouring in that ‘peer-review’ is more of a ‘pal-review’…
For a deeply insightful commentary on the state of science today, see CodeSlinger’s comment here.
Ontario is a bit of a disaster now. Through years of Liberal mismanagement, we are heading the way of Detroit: not only are businesses being driven away in record numbers, but some of our seniors and poor are sinking into energy poverty so deep that they are having to choose between food and electricity.
It is precisely because the situation is so bad that we need to educate ourselves about political options ‘out there’. In this spirit, I’d like to share with you an email I received from the Freedom Party of Ontario: