I have never heard the principle expressed so clearly and concisely! (my emphasis)
‘Win Maw, Zaw Min, Aung Zaw Oo and Chiranuch in reality all stand accused of the same crime: a commitment to free speech. Their offences have nothing to do with the technology after which the draconic instruments they purportedly transgressed have been named. The medium offended no one. The stuff that passed through it apparently did. These are not cybercrime laws at all. They are thought-crime laws.‘
This is an important distinction: the technology did not offend anyone (well, the very existence of it is threatening to some who would like to control all our thoughts, as well as our actions) – the ideas which were passed through this technology did!
All this ‘internet regulation’ is nothing less than thought-crime legislation. It’s time we started calling it by its real name.
And remember: if a law CAN be abused in any way, shape or form – it WILL BE!!!