I wish I could say this was a surprise!
‘March 24, 2009
Shortly after 9pm on Tuesday the 24th of March 2009, seven police officers in Dresden and four in Jena searched the homes of Theodor Reppe, who holds the domain registration for “wikileaks.de”, the German name for wikileaks.org. According to police documentation, the reason for the search was “distribution of pornographic material” and “discovery of evidence”. Police claim the raid was initiated due to Mr. Reppe’s position as the Wikileaks.de domain owner.
Police did not want to give any further information to Mr. Reppe and no contact was made with Wikileaks before or after the search. It is therefore not totally clear why the search was made, however Wikileaks, in its role as a defender of press freedoms, has published censorship lists for Australia, Thailand, Denmark and other countries. Included on the lists are references to sites containing pornography and no other material has been released by Wikileaks relating to the subject.
Some details of the search raise questions:
- Wikileaks was not contacted before the search, despite Wikileaks having at least two journalists which are recognized members of the German Press Association (Deutscher Presse Verband).
- The time of at least 11 police detectives was wasted conducting a futile raid on the private home of volunteer assistant to a media organization.
- Police asked for the passwords to the “wikileaks.de” domain and for the entire domain to be disabled.
- Mr Reppe was not informed of his rights; police documentation clearly shows that box to be left unchecked.
- Contrary to what is stated in the police protocol, Mr. Reppe did not agree to “not having a witness” present.
Ultimately, Mr Reppe refused to sign the police documentation due to its inaccuracies.
The raid appears to be related to a recent German social hysteria around child pornography and the controversial battle for a national censorship system by the German family minister Ursula von der Leyen. It comes just a few weeks after a member of parliament, SPD minister Joerg Tauss had his office and private house searched by police. German bloggers discussing the subject were similarly raided.
Mr. Reppe sponsors the Wikileaks German domain registration and mirrors a collection of Wikileaks US Congressional Research Service reports but is not otherwise operationally involved. Mr Reppe is also maintainer of one of the most popular German Tor-proxy servers (morphium.info) but only the connection to Wikileaks was mentioned during the raid.
Wikileaks.de and other Wikileaks domains were unaffected by the raid.
Wikileaks is a non-profit project, sponsored by transparency groups and investigative journalists world wide. To support our defense of this and other cases, see http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Wikileaks‘
Is this what it has come to? Are reputable journalistic organizations no longer allowed to report on the facts of censorship, without the fear of having their peoples’ homes searched? Are police going to be allowed to take ‘shortcuts’ from proper procedures?
It is no co-incidence that the police raid was not carried out against any of the journalists, or that the WikiLeaks office was not notified: no, picking on the techie volunteer and raiding his home is a deliberate attempt to intimidate! It is meant to send a clear and unequivocal message: if you stand up for your rights, we will get you!
Please, make no mistake: the goal of the state here is NOT to ‘protect children from abuse’ or ‘protect children from pornography’ (as if THAT second one were the state’s role, when it is clearly 100% the parents’ role)! No, this is a pretext. The goal is transparently simple: assert power, normalize the concept that the government has the power to monitor and censor all your communication, until nothing you say, type, read, see or hear will not go unrecorded, un-stored and, if you dare oppose the government, un-used to destroy you completely and totally!
How do I know this?
It is simple reasoning:
How can you make child pornography? By recording the act of sexually abusing a child, right?
So, if you prevent children from being sexually abused, you will prevent child pornography, on the internet, or anywhere else. Still correct?
Therefore, if a government is serious about stopping child pornography on the internet, one would expect such a government to strengthen its laws against pedophilia, would one not?
But, the German government, so eager to protect children from child pornography has already stated that it plans to legalize pedophilia!
Hard to believe, but true! That a government so eager to throw its weight about, pushing around techie volunteers for reputable journalistic organizations – all in the name of protecting children from child abuse – is actually going to enshrine into law that ‘pedophilia’ is a ‘protected grounds’ against which one may not be discriminated against!
Only the constitutional challenge by a lone German MP has prevented Germany from ratifying the Lisbon Treaty, and the German President had, in October 2008, stated his intention to sign the Lisbon Treaty into law by May 2009…
What is the significance of the Lisbon Treaty? It is the new set of laws which all EU states must submit to, one which clearly and unequivocally includes ‘pedophilia’ as a ‘protected grounds’ on which one is not allowed to be discriminated against! If you think I am exaggerating, please, listen to someone who is better at expressing this than I am:
So, the next time an EU politician excuses abuse of power in the name of ‘protecting children from sexual abuse’ – you know they are lying! If they were truly concerned about the kids, they would stop the practice, NOT LEGALIZE IT!!!
Don’t let their pretense at righteousness fool you: they are after raw power and are doing nothing less than normalizing these abhorrent practices into accepted means of exerting control over their populace!
Hat tip: Somebody Think of the Children !