The judge in that hearing dismissed it in a summary judgment for the Fourniers. (In his ruling, it seemed clear to me that the judge did not think Mr. Baglow had handled things well…)
John Baglow appealed.
Now, a panel of 3 judges has ruled that Dr. Dawg will have his day in court:
‘Questions about what constitutes defamation in the caustic world of blogging have not been addressed by Canadian courts “in any significant way,” Blair noted. It means, he said, that a full-blown trial is needed to explore key questions…
In other words, the case may indeed be vexatious, but the judges want to make new laws to govern the internet – and plan to do it on the Fourniers’ dime!
When I know the details of when/where the case will be heard by the court, I’ll update this post.
UPDATE: While there is still no word of the court date/time, I have received a comment on this from Connie Fournier:
‘This case will be going to a full-blown trial now and there will be expert witnesses and a full examination of the role of defamation law in the blogosphere. This is of critical importance to any Canadian who operates a website where visitors are allowed to post comments. If the law stands as it is, anyone who operates such a site should have $50,000 in the bank so that they can defend themselves when Spockluver sues CaptKirkFan for defaming his online persona.’