The Economist: ‘Why business needs people with Asperger’s syndrome, attention-deficit disorder and dyslexia’

An excellent article on some of the roles best filled by us, Aspies – even if it does have a bit of a sting in the tail…

Software firms gobble up anti-social geeks. Hedge funds hoover up equally oddball quants. Hollywood bends over backwards to accommodate the whims of creatives. And policymakers look to rule-breaking entrepreneurs to create jobs. Unlike the school playground, the marketplace is kind to misfits.’

 

Aside:  both my sons attended a school with a program for the most gifted kids (one of only two such schools in Canada’s capital region).  It was a large school and typically, there were 7 to 8 classes per grade (grades 7/8), only one of which was ‘gifted’. Having an Asperger’s diagnosis is seen as a bit of a status-symbol there…my younger son, shortly after his diagnosis, even got asked not to boast about it because he was making the other children feel inadequate for not being Aspies!  I guess this school playground was kind to misfits…

Ezra Levant: The Return of Omar Khadr

Rart 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

 

OpenMedia: Who’s on your side?

From OpenMedia:

Canadians have been raising a loud national call for every MP to stand against costly and invasive online spying. Thanks to the pro-Internet community, the video at http://openmedia.ca/stand went viral and got national news coverage from CBC,1 among others.

The response so far has exceeded our expectations: Over sixty MPs have signed up as Pro-Privacy politicians through our online tool. We have a real opportunity right now to tip the scales in favour of our online rights.

We need to act quickly. Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, far from backing down, is pushing for a renewed multi-faceted scheme to erode Canadians’ online privacy rights: Toews has also quietly been working on a deal with the U.S. known as “Perimeter Security”, which could lead to the U.S. government having access to your private data.2

We have momentum now, with over sixty MPs—nearly two-thirds of opposition MPs—on our side. Let’s seize this crucial moment and turn up the heat on the government.

Tell your MP that you want them to speak out strongly about this issue by sending them a message now.

Thank you for all that you do to safeguard the open, affordable, surveillance-free Internet.

Onward,

Steve and Lindsey, on behalf of your OpenMedia.ca team

P.S. You can see exactly which MPs are on your side, and which are not, using our new Pro-Privacy MP display tool here: http://openmedia.ca/WithCanada

P.P.S. We were only able to build this online Pro-Privacy MP tool for you because people from across the country chipped in to make it happen. Please help our small team continue to do this kind of work by making a contribution today.

Footnotes
[1] CBC News: Online surveillance bill opponents continue campaign
[2] Huffington Post: Canadians’ Online Habits Could Soon Be Available To U.S. Government Without Warrant, Critics Say

Kathy Shaidle: uncovering the face of virulent anti-Semitism in Canada

Kathy Shaidle, a blogger, has – for years – documented the most dangerous anti-Semitism in our society.  Here is just one more snippet:

 

Feeling crankier than usual…

Today, I am feeling crankier than usual…

Friday, I went to see my dentist, because a whole bunch of my teeth are so sensitive now that I could not, in good conscience, delay the visit any more.  My three-branch nerve has always been ‘twitchy’ and as soon as one tooth gets a little sore, it decides to sound all the nerves connected to it, so it makes identifying the culprit difficult, at times.

Which was the case on Friday – so my regular dentist sent me to a dentist who specializes in figuring out exactly these kind of cases.

His receptionist called and set the appointment up for me – it was this morning, Monday, at 8 am.

Just think about it:  I have discomfort, my dentist calls a specialist and I get to see said specialist the next business day.  (They offered me a couple of appointments this week to choose from…)

Some of you might think that spending early Monday morning having my sore teeth intentionally prodded and poked to get a sufficient reaction to single out the ‘bad’ tooth would be enough to make me crankier than usual.  You would be right…

But, what has annoyed me even more than my aching three-branch-nerve is what I heard on the radio on the way:  it now takes about a year for Canadians to see a medical specialist!

Same scenario as the one with the dentist :  your family doctor finds something wrong and wants to send you to a specialist.  The receptionist makes a few calls to get you an appointment.  If you are lucky, you’ll get one – in a year!!!

Of course, this varies from specialist to specialist.

For example, my father had a sports injury and he got in to see a specialist in just 9 weeks!  Of course, by then, he had healed on his own…

My own experience is worse:  I have now been on a waiting list to see a hematologist for over 3 years – and I am beginning to suspect I fell off the end of the list…and, when my specialist doctor (who looks after my particular, serious illness) got sick himself, it took over a year before another doctor would take my care over from him.

(This ‘list’ is a trick to reduce the appearance of waiting times:  once given an appointment, there is a visible amount of ‘waiting time’ which is measured between when the appointment was issued to when you see the doctor.  This ‘waiting time’ is monitored and reported – and ‘efficiency awards’ are issued based on this period of time. So, people get their name put on an unofficial, untracked ‘list’ and when they get to the top, they get assigned an appointment with a short waiting time.  People can be on such a list for years, but this time is not part of the official reports of how long it takes to see a doctor.)

The last time I was walking through one of our hospitals, there were signs posted everywhere that ‘the results of biopsies will be sent back to the referring physicians in 6-8 weeks’.

6 to 8 weeks!!!

For a biopsy  result!!!

That, of course, means that with some forms of cancer, the patient will die (or the disease will advance to an untreatable stage) before the diagnosis is confirmed and before they get on the waiting list for treatment!!!

So, how come I can get to see a dentist right away, but I wait years – if I make it at all – to see a medical specialist?

Could it be that dentistry is only constrained by the free-market while Canadian medical delivery is controlled at every step by the government?

Remember, if you are not the one paying the bill, then you are not the customer!

Yes, that is enough to make a cranky person even crankier…but, that is still not the bit that drives me ‘beyond cranky’.

No, it’s not.

That honour would be reserved for the latest attitudes our southern cousins, in the US, have towards ‘medicine’.

It drives me mad when they – or, especially, US-dwelling Canadian ex-pats, who really ought to know better – tout our Canadian medical system as ‘humane’ and ‘caring’ while turning their noses up at their best-in-the-world medical system.

It’s like ‘nails-on-chalkboard’ to me when I hear them claim our (Canadian) system ‘treats everyone’ while their (American) system will not treat people who don’t have a credit card.  This is simply not true:  there is a law in the US that makes it illegal to turn people away from an emergency room if they don’t have a good enough credit card. There are also free clinics…

In Canada, people have died when they got turned away from the emergency room for not having their government-issued health card on them. And once, while renewing the health card, I saw a guy in the queue there who was on crutches, with his foot backward on his leg.  The emergency room would not treat his complex leg fracture until he went to the main office downtown (far from any hospital) and got his paperwork straightened out…

Oh, here’s a good one:  did you know that some blood tests can only be done in a hospital?  The private clinics simply don’t have the tech for some specialized tests…

Hospitals for adults will not perform these tests on anyone under the age of 16 – there are strict rules.

Hospitals for children will not perform these tests on anyone over the age of 11 who is an out-patient.  Even if the head nurse phones OHIP and begs for an exception – no, not permitted.

In Canada, your kids had better not need any of those tests from when they turn 12 to when they turn 16:  their doctors will simply have to diagnose them without it.  I know – I had been on this merry-go-round with one of my kids!

And yet, the US is not only trying to copy our medicare, the proponents of this feel all righteous and ‘noble’ about it.

Yeah, I’m cranky…

ReasonTV’s ‘Nanny of the Month’ for May, 2012: Michael Bloomberg

 

Thunderf00t: LAST CHANCE in this lifetime to see one of these!

Successful splashdown for SpaceX Dragon space capsule

Well, this sounds promising!

‘It took half a tonne of food and supplies up to the ISS astronauts, and brought down about two-thirds of a tonne of completed experiments and redundant equipment.

A successful recovery of the capsule and its contents will trigger a $1.6bn (£1bn; 1.3bn-euro) contract with the US space agency (Nasa) for 12 further re-supply trips.’

SpaceX is demonstrating that a private company can do what a national government can, except better and cheaper.

So, why do we stll trust the government to deliver really important programmes, like, say, education and healthcare?

One Law For All: ‘Sharia law: neither equal not free’

From an email from Miriam Namazie:

Update on Baroness Cox’s Equality Bill
One Law for All has been spending a lot of time recently working with Caroline Cox and her team in promoting the Arbitration and Mediation Services (Equalities) Bill. The aim of the Bill, which was introduced to the House of Lords last year, is to make arbitration services in the UK subject to equality laws and to bar any arbitration where parties are of unequal standing; for example, it would disallow arbitration providers placing greater weight on the testimony of one party over another, as is the case with sharia law where a wife’s word is worth only half of her husband’s. The Bill will also create a criminal offence and make it illegal for arbitration bodies to pretend they have greater jurisdiction than they do – in other words, preventing them from misinforming people that they must obey their rulings. It will also place a duty on public bodies in the UK to inform women of their rights under British la w.
The Bill is due for a second reading in the House of Lords this October. Many Peers have already pledged support but we need your help in persuading them further. If you have time, please write to any members of the House of Lords and ask them to consider the seriousness of this Bill and its need in maintaining a society where all people are equal before a single secular and democratic law. In your letter, you could point out to Peers that the Islamic Sharia Council and the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal both openly acknowledge that the testimony of women is given less value than that of men, that custody of children is awarded to fathers regardless of the circumstances, and that sharia family law permits, and therefore encourages, domestic violence and the abuse of women and children.  You can find out how to write to Peers here: http://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/contact-a-lord/lord/. You can read the bill here:  http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2012-13/arbitrationandmediationservicesequality.html.
‘Equal and Free?’, a book of evidence compiled in support of the Bill, can be found here: http://equalandfree.org/download-file/downloads/EqualandFree.pdf. It includes testimony from women who have been through the sharia family law system here in Britain, as well as charities and groups which work closely with these women. It also looks at other religious tribunals, such as the Beth Din, and the effect the Bill may have on arbitration more broadly.
Debates and Conferences
One of the issues of concern to those deciding whether to support the Bill is that it may represent an infringement on religious liberty. One Law for All maintains that the right to freedom of religion ends at the point where other people’s rights begin. Sharia family and criminal law represent a serious infringement upon the rights of women to receive a fair hearing and to live without violence or the threat of violence. We will be holding a debate on this issue in the coming months and will invite members of both Houses of Parliament to attend – further details will follow. For more information on other speaking engagements and events, visit: http://www.onelawforall.org.uk/category/events/.
Child Protection
As has been mentioned, sharia family law awards custody of children to fathers from a pre-set age regardless of the circumstances, and regardless of whether the father is abusive or violent. Again, the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal and the Islamic Sharia Council do not deny this fact.  It is also known that matters of child custody and contact are being increasingly heard by sharia bodies, increasing the isolation of Muslims in Britain and endangering the children of Muslim parents who may be excluded from the protections provided by British law – which places the wellbeing of the child as the paramount consideration in all questions of this kind. We have been pushing this message very strongly at the House of Lords; all Peers have now received a copy of ‘Equal and Free?’ which contains details of how sharia family law is flouting legal norms in matters of child protection, and the danger this represents &ndas h; it is creating a parallel legal system, based on religion, in the UK.
Support us!
December will mark four years since the establishment of the One Law for All campaign. A lot has changed in the public debate on Sharia law and equality as a result of our campaign. If you want to and can, please help us to continue our essential work. To donate to the work of One Law for All, you can either send a cheque made payable to One Law for All to BM Box 2387, London WC1N 3XX, UK or pay via Paypal.  We also need regular support and for supporters to commit to giving at least £5-10 a month via direct debit. You can find out more about how to donate or join the 100 Club here: http://www.onelawforall.org.uk/donate/.
Also, if you shop online, please do so via the Easy Fundraising’s website: http://www.easyfundraising.org.uk/register-supporter/?char=40474. It won’t cost you anything extra but can help raise much needed funds for One Law for All.
Finally, if you haven’t already signed up to the One Law for All campaign, please join the nearly 29,000 people and groups that have: http://onelawforallpetition.com/onelaw/onela300.php?nr=40155035.
Thanks again
Warmest wishes
Anne Marie Waters
One Law for All Spokesperson
NOTES
1. The One Law for All Campaign was launched on 10 December 2008, International Human Rights Day, to call on the UK Government to recognise that Sharia and religious courts are arbitrary and discriminatory against women and children in particular and that citizenship and human rights are non-negotiable.
2. For further information contact:
Maryam Namazie
Anne Marie Waters
Spokespersons
One Law for All
BM Box 2387
London WC1N 3XX, UK

Freedom From Religion Foundation sues South Carolina School District

When I was in high school, we started every morning by the playing of ‘Oh Canada’, our national anthem.

Being a recent immigrant, I found this daily exercise of overt of tribalism to be weird in the extreme and did not, at first, understand why it would come about at all…

Over time, I began to understand the impulse that drove the playing of the national anthem 1st thing every morning:  it ‘clicked’ for me a bit after we got a new principal.

Our old principal would ask us to ‘stand for ‘Oh Canada’ and a few moments of silent prayer or meditation’.  When our new principal took over, the ritual was retained in exactly the same form, except that the ‘or meditation’ was dropped.

Now, I was being told to stand for the national anthem and prayer!!!

Of course, I complained:  not about the anthem, but about the dropping of ‘or meditation’.  I complained to several teachers; each one of them told me that it’s OK for me not to pray, because since it is a ‘silent prayer’, nobody will know that I am not praying.  I tried to be calm as I explained that that was hardly the point – and that behaving immoraly because I can get away with it is not a good lesson for them to be teaching me anyway.  The point was that by removing the ‘or meditation’ bit, they were denying the very existence of non-theists and that that was rather insulting and probably illegal.

It was then that it ‘clicked’ for me why it was that the morning was started with the national anthem:  the theists who ran the system could not imagine starting their day without a ritualistic appeal to authority.  Since they could not openly pray out loud in the secular school, they replaced the ritualistic appeal to a divine authority by an equally ritualistic appeal to the secular authority…

In other words, the playing of ‘Oh Canada’ was not really an expression of patriotism but rather a substitute for ritualistic prayer…

Which is a very round-about way to introduce the following story:

‘The Freedom From Religion Foundation and one of its South Carolina members filed a lawsuit today in U.S. District Court in Columbia, S.C., against School District Five of Lexington and Richland Counties over a district policy that sanctions graduation prayer. Plaintiff Matthew Nielson graduated with his Irmo High School classmates today.

Nielson, 18, and state-church watchdog FFRF allege the district’s written policy violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs, represented by South Carolina counsel Aaron Kozloski, ask the court to declare the district’s policy null and void.

Despite the decades, religionists are still imposing their fetishes onto kids!

In related news: