Can Volunteers Protect Communities?

When police officers patrol the streets, their right to do so does not derive from the State – it derives from the right of all citizens to protect their selves, family and property.  Just because we have permitted the police officers to perform these tasks on our behalf (as opposed to just their own individual behalf) does not, in any way, shape or form, abrogate both our right and our responsibility to also do so ourselves.

It is therefore with great sadness that I hear of incidents like ‘the Spiceman’, where a man who protected his family and property with a broom and tossed a handful of spices at his attacker was arrested by the police and charged with assault with a weapon and administering a noxious substance – while the original perp was not charged with anything.

While most commentators agree that it is ridiculous to suggest that the restaurateur did not have the right to protect his property, I would go further:  he not only had that right, he had the obligation to do so.  To do anything less would be an abdication of his civic responsibilities with respect to his fellow neighbours.

As for the actions of the police….don’t even get me started!  They have no problem trampling over the civil liberties of people who have not broken any laws (kettlin, anyone? – trap them all and not worry about any silly civil liberties), but repeated calls regarding property damage are simply ignored. (Or how about the frivolous dismissal of death threats against Tarek Fatah as he lay in a hospital bed?) That is abdication of their duties by the police officers on two different counts:  their professional duties as well as their basic citizenship duties.

And don’t even get me started on Caledonia!

Yet, we have been so trained to accept police officers’ dismissal of our complaints and concerns that we no longer question it.

I know that I no longer report minor theft or property damage to the police:  like, when my car got broken into last week and my purse got stolen.  (Luckily, my wallet was not in my purse – I like to keep a ‘packed’ back-up purse in my car as a ‘coping mechanism’ because I get forgetful and might need the stuff when I am out and about – but I would never leave my wallet/keys in an unattended car.  My purse just contains necessities:  a notepad/puzzles, 5-10 pens, some cyanoacrylate glue, change, mints/gum, a sewing kit, a couple of books, 1st aid kit – you know, necessities you should not leave home without.)  Since the last time the car was broken into, the cops’ attitude was ‘what do you want us to do about it?’, I really did not see the point in the hassle:  I would not benefit from reporting it and certainly no effective action would be taken if I did – so why waste the tax-money by reporting it?

While I don’t know how to fix this disconnect from, indifference to and, at times, open hostility towards the citizenry from our Police forces, it is important that we search for various ideas and examine their merit.  It is in this spirit that I would like to show you the following video:

Obviously, not a perfect solution.  But, it is thinking in the right direction….

Tim Hudak in Caledonia on 13th of March, 2012

It starts out pretty ‘vanilla’, but then it gets more colourful…

For those not familiar with Ontario politics: for the last 6 years, the community of Caledonia has been torn apart by violence as a native land claim had led to armed occupation, division of the municipality, violence and police response where law-abiding citizens were arrested for wanting to go home, because this might provoke a violent reaction from armed native occupiers.  The non-native residents of Caledonia were not the only victims:  as armed ‘warriors’ from across Canada flooded to Caledonia to flex their muscle, the law-abiding citizens of the 5 Nations Reservation were equally victimized as incidents of rape and other violence were swept under the rug while the armed thugs bullied the community…

Mr. Hudak himself is a bit of an enigma…

He is very charismatic in person – that much is undeniable.

Still, the last election was his to lose – and he did lose it, spectacularly.

On the same issue that his predecessor did:  religion in schools.

Conservatives in Canada must learn to separate religion from their policies or they will never be trusted by voters enough to be voted into power.  Mr. Hudak failed there and handed the despicable McGuinty the election victory.

Still, coming into conflict-riddled Caledonia took a lot of guts – and Hudak has raised my opinion of him both for going there and for what he had said.

Unfortunately, Mr. McHale – the man who has led the fight in Caledonia for equality before the law and against race-based policing – he behaved badly (in my never-humble-opinion).

Perhaps he was disappointed that a politician did not behave like an activist….just like his expectations that Mr. Hudak could rid us of the Ontario Human Rights Commission while he was a leader of the opposition were just a little outside of what was possible.  He certainly did not come across as the reasonable warrior for equality whose speech in Ottawa I liked and whom I admired.

Merlin – the vet who was interviewed at the end of the video – he got the measure of the situation just right!

Warrants? We don’t need no stinking warrants!!!

This is beyond the pale!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7DGAv4IuSc&feature=colike

Yes, Mr. Levant is correct to raise the spectre of Pavlik Morozov:  I was certainly taught in school to live up to his example.  But that was on the other side of the iron curtain!  There is no room for twisted crap like that in our schools now!

Let you be the first to read it!

I have a gun.

I even volunteered in a school, teaching children how to use a gun, just like mine.

A glue gun, that is.

I have a whole bunch of glue sticks in an ammo box I bought at an army surplus store – partly because I like puns and partly because it is efficient.

I also own a tape gun – it makes wrapping presents more efficient.

And I have two staple guns.  (OK, one is my hubby’s, but that makes at least half of it mine, no?)

My kids own guns, too!

From the air-zooka (which ‘shoots’ air, if you are not familiar with it) through a marshmallow gun to water guns…

But if I wanted to own a firearm – an actual gun for shooting bullets – I would not feel obligated to tell ‘the state’.  Why?  Because I believe, to the core of my being, that the Magna Carta gives me the right to carry whatever arms I think I need to protect my person, family and property.  Nothing – no law  – can, in my never-humble-opinion – abrogate this natural right to protect myself.

It is precisely because I have the right to carry weapons that police has the power to carry weapons:  they derive that right from me, and you, and all the other citizens. Since the government acts as our proxy, it cannot do what each and every one of us does not have the right to do, irrespective of the government.

This equation goes both ways:  since the state is acting on our behalf, it cannot do anything we are not free to do.  Therefore, if some agents of the state do carry firearms, it therefore follows that each and every citizen has that very same right.  If we did not have that right, then the government agents would have nowhere to get that right from.

I recognize I am not expressing this eloquently – following is a video that does a much better job of it:

When all the rhetoric is washed away, at its core, this is about self-ownership.

Video from Caledonia from 18th of February, 2012

Garry McHale arrestted again, because the sight of him ‘provoked’ someone to violence

This is the result when we stop remembering the proper roles for police, the military and the government.

The reason we have police is to uphold the laws of the land.  That is, they are the instrument of force the State uses against its civilian population to maintain its monopoly on lawmaking within their territory.  Basic, simple and clear, right?

The only legitimate role for a police force is to uphold the law – equally and without discrimination.

The only legitimate role for a police officer is to uphold the laws within the policing framework, and it is each individual officer’s personal responsibility to ensure they are not upholding the laws unequally or obeying illegal orders.  This is essential because it is the front-line police officers who are the agents of the state within this:  that is why they are the only ones who can safeguard this powerful force from corruption.

When exactly did the role of the police become re-defined from ‘enforcing the law of the land’ to ‘maintaining public peace’?

Because ‘maintaining public peace’ is not the same thing as ‘upholding the laws of the land’.  If a crowd is upset by the presence of a witch, the easiest, most cost-effective course of action for someone ‘maintaining public peace’ is to simply  burn the witch!

Most moral people would have a problem with this approach…

Yet, this is exactly what the OPP are doing in Caledonia:  faced with an angry mob, they target the person the mob is angry at instead of maintaining order by upholding the laws of the land!

People who are willing to tolerate this approach to ‘maintaining peace’, who are ‘keeping their heads down’ in the conviction this will stop the mob from going after them should remember that in Eastern and Central Europe, the witch hunters sometimes killed every man, woman and child in a village they thought was infected with witchcraft.

The ‘peace of the tomb’ is not something our society ought to be striving for.  Yet that is the logical result of the type of policing the OPP is practicing in Caledonia and many other places in Ontario!

JotForm’s domain suspended for user-generated content

JotForm is a web company that lets people easily generate forms for whatever they need.  Now, their domain has been siezed and their site has been blocked in a SOPA-style action.  From the JotForm blog:

‘UPDATE: Many people on the comments assumed the content was posted by us. This can happen to any site that allows public to post content. SOPA may not have passed, but what happened shows that it is already being practiced. All they have to do is to ask Godaddy to take a site down. We have 2 millions user generated forms. It is not possible for us to manually review all forms. This can happen to any web site that allows user generated content.’

(Emphasis added by me.)

So, here we have yet another confirmation that despite of SOPA itself having been scrapped, the practices it was normalizing already exist and are being followed by state agents.

This is outrageous on so many levels…and yet, it is even worse on the other side of the pond

We must shine the light under all these proverbial rocks, or we’ll be overrun by the creepy-crawlies!

Ending race-based policing in Ontario – let us hope we are one step closer

I received an email which I would like to reproduce in its (almost) entirety, because it not only speaks for itself, it also includes the most-important links….and, it does raise a ray of hope!

Here it is, in its (almost) entirety (I only redacted a phone number):

1. Just days after our Queen’s Park news conference –‘Ending Race-Based Policing: The Caledonia Act\,’ – where we were joined by speakers from the pro-Israel Never Again Group and the International Free Press Society,  MPP Toby Barrett has issued a call for strong action re the Caledonia occupation, and praised our efforts and ideas for reaching a resolution…

“Barrett credits Gary Mchale and CANACE for keeping the issue alive in the media and in the limelight, suggesting a lot of McHale’s ideas have been ‘pretty good’.” They include having more oversight from the Ontario Ombudsman with respect to the OPP and more protection for whistleblowers in the Police service.

 

It was Toby Barrett who made the Queen’s Park Media Studio available for our news conference, as he has done in the past.
2. You can read the Caledonia Act recommendations here:
3. See also TobyBarrett.com: Occupy Caledonia will be six years February 28
This is the first time that Toby has publicly complimented our work to the media, and we hope it is a sign of good things to come.
Thank you Toby.
Mark Vandermaas 
VoiceofCanada.ca
IpperwashPapers.ca
ConservativesAgainstFantino.ca
HelplessByBlatchford.ca 

Warrantless surveillance is becoming a reality in Canada

Oh, I know I cannot write this up in a way to do this topic justice – mostly because it sends my blood pressure so dangerously high.  After all, blind rage is the only reasonable response to a minister claiming that those whodare to voice reservations about a proposed law that would make mincemeat out of civil liberties are no better than child molesters.

Because that is exactly what he is saying.

OK – I’m about to loose my temper…again…and not finish this post…

ARRRRGGGHHHH!

Resorting to the ‘do it or you hate children and kick puppies’ is the last resort of a bully who knows he cannot defend his position based on the issues!

AAAAAARRRRRGGGHHHH!!!!

YES!  It actually IS supposed to be difficult to deprive people of their liberties:  that is why cops have to follow all them silly rules!!!  Taking the rules away will not make one child safer, while at the same time, it will make all of us a little less safe!

AAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!

Michael Geist has a good write-up on this – with lots of excellent and informative links.  Read him – it’ll make more sense than I can.

As you ponder this, also take a peek at this.

THAT is the root of the problem:  the system lacks accountability!

Actually, that article just might explain a lot about the minister’s attitude:  they have already started to build a huge electronic surveillance system.  Parts of it have been operational for years!

All the bluster now is to hide that they have as yet to pass the laws to make it legal…

 

Gary McHale on SunTV

 

All charges against ‘the Caledonia 8’ have been dropped – again

Patterns.

Behavioural patterns.

Patterns of abuse.

When will some authority – any authority – acknowledge a pattern of abuse and put an end to it?

Let me paint a picture for you of a very nasty pattern of abuse of authority which has targeted a specific citizens and his associates:

Imagine being arrested for ‘trespassing’ for walking down a public street.  While you are being arrested, you actually have proof with you that this is a county street – and therefore 100% it is public street, with no restrictions, so no act of trespassing is taking place.

In addition, since it is a county road and therefore not within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Provincial Police, even if someone were to trespass on it, these OPP officers would have no jurisdiction to arrest them for it.

But, the OPP are there in large numbers, heavily armed, and they arrest the small group of unarmed citizens anyway.

These citizens (including an army vet suffering from cancer) are handcuffed and driven off in OPP vehicles, processed and charged with trespassing.

They are forced to hire legal representation and appear in court.

Once they get to court – the group of citizens find all the charges against them have been withdrawn!

Why?

Because, as the prosecutor explains, there is no reasonable expectation that they would be found guilty…beause, well, they were on a public road where they had every right to be, and even had they been trespassing, the police officers who arrested them had no jurisdiction to do so…

Victory?

Perhaps – in this one battle.

But, what if this happens over and over and over?

If the charges are withdrawn, these citizens have no opportunity to clear their name – and recover legal costs, much less damages!

And what does it say about our law enforcement agencies, that they are willing to perpetuate this abusive pattern of ‘catch-and-release’?!?!?

This is exactly what has been happening to Gary McHale.

Now, more and more citizens are standing with him, being arrested with him – and being released when the bogus charges against them are dropped!

Please, ask yourself:  should we, the people of Canada, tolerate this treatment of our citizens?

Just how badly is our system broken that such a lengthy pattern of this type of abusive of power can be established?

And exactly what can we, as citizens, do to stop this corruption?

How can we hold out authorities accountable?

Because we must – for all our sakes!