Pirate Party of Canada is running candidates in th2011 Canadian federal election

Who the … is the Pirate Party of Canada?

And, why am I writing about them?

I am writing about them because, for the first time ever, I have come accross so very many people who are so reluctant to give their votes to the ‘traditional’ politicial parties that they are – for the first time in their lives – considering not voting at all.  Or spoiling their ballot in protest…

And, the Pirate Party of Canada may be a strategic place to trust one’s vote to.  They don’t stand much of a chance to get elected (though, in Sweden, the home of the Pirate Party movement, they have 2 seats in the European Parliament), but the more votes they get, the more their central message will be strengthened, perhaps even reach the ears of the policymakers…

What is theie central message message?

It my never-humble-opinion, it seems to be this:

  • Current copyright and patent laws are unbalanced
  • Anti-copyright-infringment and anti-terrorism laws are too invasive and can (and will) be tools of oppression.  Therefore, these must be reformed, with an eye to privacy rights

But, don’t rely on my imperfect understanding  check them out yourself.  Even if they are not your cup of grog, their message is worth thinking about.

If you are interested in a bit of the background – the zeitgeist that gave rise to the Pirate Party, it is well described in’Steal This Film‘.  Here are Part 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and (better) Part  2.1 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5.

Some of these very serious issuess – without the ‘pirate mentality’ – are presented inMichael Geist’s movie, ‘Why Copyright‘.

Why raise this issue now?

Well, the ‘gatekeepers’ who profit from manufacturing ‘culture’ have now began convincing governments that having file-sharing capability on one’s personal computer automatically means they intend to breech copyright laws – and so they are passing laws against this.

According to these laws, my son would be a criminal, for ‘filesharing’ when he submits his homework to his teacher electronically – which he does, because it is easier, neater and he gets immediate feedback…

According to this, my husband and his brother would be criminals because they file-share family photos and have programs on their computers that allow them to back-up store all of each other’s photofiles…

And now, the Conservatives want to pass a law that would give civil servants complete access to all the ‘internet activity’ of Canadian citizens – without judicial oversight!!!  As in, any civil servant could listen in to all your VOIP phone calls, read all your emails, follow each click you surf – without telling you….  In Michigan, cops routinely download all information from a person’s phone during a traffic stop…this would, in a very real way, permit each and every civil servant to do the same when your phone is sinked-up to your computer.

Even if you have nothing to hide, do you trust your civil servants not to abuse these new powers?

We need to bring balance to our IP and copyright laws.

Right now, there is not even a pretense, not even a lip service to privacy (not to mention all the other violations of liberty)!

Which is why taking a look at the Pirate Party of Canada – just taking a look – does not seem like a bad idea.

Before you vote – or evaluate the nex political opinion poll…

Perhaps a little pessimistic….

…perhaps a little time-consuming….

…perhaps only part of the truth….

…but, something we should all see before we vote!  (And, before we evaluate the next political opinion poll….)

Part 1...23…and 4.

Victimless Criminal: ‘Netherlands Votes on Banning Halal & Kosher’

Yes!!!

We need this kind of a law in Canada!

CGPGrey: explaining problems with ‘First Past the Post’ and ‘Alternative Vote’

“First Past the Post” or “Winner Takes All”:

“The Alternative Vote”:

The ‘Silver Revolution’?!?!?

What is this ‘Silver Liberation Army’?

A peaceful, law-abiding way to wage a revolution?  They say:

“Crash J.P. Morgan – buy lots of silver!”

This is looking interesting…

H/T: DU

Posted in politics. Tags: . 1 Comment »

Victimless Criminal: ‘An Imam, a Donkey and a Sheep’

No Agenda ‘Shots’: Obama receives ‘transparency’ award

Nigel Farage on Libya – Russia Today 2011

This guy makes a lot of sense.

Don’t get me wrong – I am more of a hawk than a dove, but what we are doing in Libya makes absolutely no sense.

If we were outraged over the atrocities against civilians, how come the civilians in Darfur (or any other of a hellish places) did not matter?

How come Khadaffi’s atrocities did not make us his enemies until he had had a ‘falling out’ (to put it mildly) with the French President?

And why exactly is it that we are helping the ‘rebels’ who are – even according to the government sanctioned experts – controlled by Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?!?!?

This is insanity!  And that is even before we look at the specifics of the action itself – going in without clearly defining what the ‘end result’ we desire is….

OK, it sounds patronizing, but in this case, it is well earned:  if you fail to plan, you plan to fail!

Now, my question to you is this:

How do we get Mr. Nigel Farage to run for Prime Minister of Canada?!?!?

Why are so few Canadians voting these days?

Statistics are showing (or so we are being told) that fewer and fewer Canadians vote.  Commentators are lamenting this, some are suggesting that people who do not vote should be fined and all kinds of other nonsense.

So, why?

The reasons why the percentage of Canadians actually voting isdecreasing are really very simple:  our votes do not matter.

REALLY matter.

Oh, I understand – we get to vote in one band of politicians or another – and our votes matter in deciding which bunch gets in when.  And, some politicians are worse than others.

But that is quickly becoming minutia, a cosmetic change rather than a substantive.

Why?

Because our very system is broken.  And it is broken on multiple levels, which is why fixing it is not an easy proposition.

One level on which it is broken is the most easily visible one:  our elected representatives are supposed to be answerable to us, the citizens….but, increasingly, they are only answerable to their own party leadership!

In other words, the party system we have in Parliament and in Provincial Legislatures has tipped the balances too far toward ‘party influence’ and away from ‘voter influence’.  After all, if their nomination papers are not signed by the party leadership, a candidate must run as an independent:  and just how many of those manage to get elected?!?!?

This gives the party leaders great power of control over their elected MPs!  Too great an amount of power:  to the point that the good/will of the party is the only thing our elected officials consider when ‘representing us’.

In a very real sense, we are no longer voting for our local representatives – when we cast our votes, we are voting for one or another party.  Sure, it is still a choice to make – but it is not the choice our Parliamentary system was designed for.  It is not the one for which the ‘checks and balances’ we have built into the system were designed.  And it makes for very unresponsive government…because the policies of each party have to cover so many issues, we can only pick ‘bundle A’ vs ‘bundle B’ of good and bad things.

That is not the type of choice most people want:  picking a lot of bad things, because among them are few good things you want.  It means that no matter which party you are choosing, you are necessarily choosing some things you do not want, things you consider to be bad things.  And, by voting, you are making those bad things happen.

People don’t like that.  So, more and more don’t vote.

Because, when being forced to pick from several bad choices, most people prefer not to choose at all.

But that ‘level’ is only the most visible way in which our system is broken.

If the ‘party in power’ is the ‘what’ of the government policy, the civil service is the ‘how’.

I have personally seen and heard some high ranking civil servants explain exactly ‘how’ the elected politicians must be ‘handled’.  Real life – not Sir Humphry Appelby.  How what I thought to have been a uniquely ‘sound’ government policy which does not reflect the goals of the public service is contorted and the way it is implementation is sabotaged to the point where it not only fails, but fails in such a manner that it is obvious such an ill-conceived policy could never have worked and it failed because the politicians were too arrogant to listen to the experienced civil service experts!!!

Yes – to a degree much higher than most of us are aware of, we are being governed by a bunch of unknown, unseen, unaccountable high-level civil servants with a vision of their own:  power through regulation.

Do you ever ask why is it that representatives of various government regulatory agencies have much, much greater powers than police do?  Power to enter your property without a court order – and also without your knowledge, much less content.  Power to take your stuff away from you ‘pending their investigation’? Do you even know the full extent of their powers?

It is a stealth-totalitarianism-through-red-tape!

In a state like that, the elected politicians are increasingly little more than window dressing.  Why bother voting for them?

If I knew how to fix this, I would say so.  I don’t.  But, considering that most of these career bureaucrats have been in the public service for several decades before they have gained sufficient ‘influence’ and arrogance to sabotage policies they disagree with, I suspect we will need to bring in laws limiting the amount of time a person may serve in the public sector. Regulate the regulators, so to speak…

Sure, front line police officers and similar things – a different story.  I don’t claim this is a well developed solution – to the contrary. It is more of a niggling suspicion that has been growing for a while .

These are just two of many failures in our governance structures – pretending there is no problem is only driving voters to apathy…

What do you think?

 

Tarek Fatah exposes Ignatieff’s and the Liberal Party’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood

From Tarek Fatah on Facebook:

Friends,

The Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) designated by the US Justice Department and the FBI as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood, is partnering with the Liberal Party and Michael Ignatieff to host a fundraising event for liberal candidate Omar AlGhabra in Mississauga tonight.

As if this link alone was not troublesome, ICNA is making no secret of their association with both Ignatieff and AlGhabra. In a mass e-mail burst, ICNA head A. Qayyum Mufti wrote:

“Please help Omar AlGhabra reach the the parliament once again. Support him in his campaign by volounteering, financially, and inviting others. Join him this Monday to kick start his 2011 election campaign.”

For the uninitiated, ICNA follows the ideology of the Jamaat-e-Islami in Pakistan and the doctrine of the Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan Albanna. The spiritual head of ICNA is the late Syed Maududi who was once sentenced to death for his role in the pogroms aimed at liquidating the Ahmaddiya Muslims in Pakistan in 1952.

How on earth will the leader of the Liberal Party Michael Ignatieff explain why he got himself in bed with ICNA? Well, if Rob Oliphant can have lunch with a pro-Taliban politician Imran Khan, then ICNA promoting a liberal candidate should be no big surprise.

Tarek

——–

 

Head over to his page – he has more!

HT:  BCF