Justice delayed, justice denied: Gary McHale on Caledonia

Gary McHale is fighting our fight!

 

EFF: U.S. Government Threatens Free Speech With Calls for Twitter Censorship

The full article is at Electronic Frontier Foundation:

‘ Moreover, criminalizing, or even trying to criminalize a neutral communications service like Twitter would set a dangerous precedent –like criminalizing pens and pencils or typewriters and computers based on what people choose to say when using them.’

‘Twitter is right to resist.  If the U.S. were to pressure Twitter to censor tweets by organizations it opposes, even those on the terrorist lists, it would join the ranks of countries like India, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Syria, Uzbekistan, all of which have censored online speech in the name of “national security.”  And it would be even worse if Twitter were to undertake its own censorship regime, which would have to be based upon its own investigations or relying on the investigations of others that certain account holders were, in fact, terrorists.’

This is the true test of our committment to the freedom of speech:  do we deny it to those who are despicable scum?

Who is to know if you yourself will, one day, be defined to be ‘despicable scum’ by the powers that be?

Some things are non-negotiable.

Freedom of speech is one of these non-negotiables!

Why is SOPA not part of the evening news?

Perhaps because most of the parent companies of TV news broadcasts are staunch supporters of SOPA:

‘Dimiero based his report on Lexis-Nexis searches which includes transcripts of nighttime newscasts.

Comcast/NBCUniversal (which owns MSNBC and NBC News), Viacom (CBS), News Corporation (Fox News), Time Warner (CNN) and Disney (ABC) are all listed as supporters of the bill. ABC and CBS are also listed as separate supporters of the bill.’

Just in case you were wondering why TV news is igniring this, if it is such a hot topic…

Isn’t a lie of omission still a lie, when it comes to building up trust in your news-sources?

Or is it unreasonable for us to expect news reporters to report news honestly and thoroughly, regardless of how it affects their corporate owners?  Because if we cannot, we must openly realize this and re-categorize ‘news reporters’ as ‘corporate spin officers’ and view all they say through the appropriate lens…

…and people wonder why the legacy media is in its death-throws…

TED talk by Michael Sandel

This is an excellent little talk – as most TED talks are!

I came across Michael Sandel just a few weeks ago, when my loving spouse began listening to his Philosophy lectures on ‘Justice’ on YouTube.  We both liked the lectures so much, we routed them to our TV and watched the whole series over the holidays – with frequent pauses to discuss the points he was making.

Most enjoyable!

This is also the very first introduction I have ever had to formal philosophy:  all my previous exposure was just by thinking about things and talking with others about it.  So, in this way, it was to a great degree filling some holes in the historic context of how these ideas evolved through the society.

It also demonstrated to my satisfaction that, at least according to the labels on ideas in this course, I may indeed be a bit of a libertarian…

Daniel Hannan: How the West unwittingly sponsors Islamism

Announcement: Vi Hart and Khan Academy join forces!

Yeay!

Here is the official announcement…

 

Missouri judge rules in favour of warrantless GPS surveillance

From WiredNews:

‘The ruling, upholding federal theft and other charges, is one in a string of decisions nationwide supporting warrantless GPS surveillance. Last week’s decision comes as the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the issue within months in an unrelated case.’

It seems that ‘expectation of privacy’ is dwindling so much that pretty soon, there will be no expectation of privacy for anyone, anywhere!

Just how far will we permit ‘big brother’ to stretch the ‘no expectation of privacy’?

Let’s see just how close to zero expectation of privacy we actually are, right now:

  • We  do not have it when walking around in public, as the use of surveilance cameras is being supplemented by a growing fleet of unmarked back-scatter X-ray vans roaming the urban streets.
  • We do not have it in our cars – either the built-in GPS system (like OnStar) can be accessed by ‘big brother’ or ‘big brother’ can add his own, as the above ruling shows.
  • We no longer have it in any form of electronic communication, as laws like SOPA and PIPA make warantless surveilance of all electronic communication the norm, thus removing any expectation to privacy in anything one does online, including VOIP phone calls.
  • US citizens do not have an expectation of privacy in their homes, as the courts there have ruled (I think I blogged it at the time) that using high-tech surveillance tools (including infrared detectors to monitor the movement of individuals inside the home) is perfectly legal as long as the tools are used outside of the home.

Where is left?

Truly and honestly, where do we have left where we enjoy ‘expectation of privacy’?!?!?

When you have no place left where you have ‘an expectation of privacy’, does this mean that the government has the right to monitor your every move, 24/7/365?

Is this truly the society we wish to build?

Tommy Robinson tells details of how he was attacked by Islamists – again