Saudi Arabia set to execute political prisoner by crucifiction

Yes, you read that right!

‘A prisoner in Saudi Arabia, who was sentenced to death as a child, faces “death by crucifixion” after a final appeal has been dismissed. Ali Mohammed al-Nimr was arrested on 14 February 2012 when he was just 17, during a crackdown on anti-government protests in the Shiite province of Qatif. He was accused by the authorities of participation in illegal protests and of firearms offences, despite there being no evidence to justify the latter charge.’

I’m just hoping this is an Onion-esque type of a hoax.

Oh, and here is the picture that was published with the article:

Ali Mohammed al-Nimr
Ali Mohammed al-Nimr faces death by crucifixion for alleged participation in anti-government protestsFacebook

A question – please answer, if you can!

Yes, I usually post my never-humble-opinions.

But this time, I know I would be out of my depth had I offered one….

Still, the question itself has kept me up on more than one night.

Granted, my early schooling came behind the Iron Curtain – so, perhaps the very premises of my question are flawed.  Yet, I have read enough (among the little bits of ‘H’istory that I have indulged myself in) here, in The West, that suggests to me that this question may, indeed, be more valid today than it has been in, well, almost a century.

Therefore, my dear reader, I beg you to indulge me in asking my question and, if you can, in enlightening me with the answer.

Thank you!

Now, for my long-winded question:

Before World War 1, the movement of peoples between nations was not regulated.

At least, it was not regulated in the manner in which it became regulated later on in the 20th century.

Yes, of course, there were border controls:  but these were meant mostly for economic purposes (import/export taxes) and to apprehend criminals.

After all, it was not so long ago that mainland Europe was still using the Feudal System of governance, where the freedom of movement of country folk was under complete control of their landlords.

And the aristocracy was not limited by borders:  crossing them freely and unencumbered to pursue political marriages.  The land they held was their only anchor to the kingdom in which they held it.

The craftsmen were also not anchored in place by ‘kingdom-governance’ (I cannot think of a proper term for this), but by the self-regulated guilds of their region, under which they were permitted to practice their craft:  guilds were built upon the apprentice-based artificially created scarcity of their products within various regions, calculated to ensure higher-than-market value of their work and thus inflating guild-members standard of living and social standing.

Similarly, scholars and artists moved freely between kingdoms, based on where they could find private patrons willing to fund them and their works.  (Note:  painters may be regarded as ‘artists’ today, but, prior to accessible photography, they were considered craftsmen and thus subject to the guild system.)  For example, consider the alchemical court of Rudolph the Second.

After centuries of feudalism, it took a bit from when the shackles were shattered to when people gathered the courage to reach for freedom and travel to far-away lands – not just to learn, or as a right of passage, but to settle for good.

At the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, the human migrations truly became unfettered and populations began to migrate.

From my own cultural background – this is where the huge exodus of Czechs into Texas began:  so great was this migration that it was not until the 1970’s that Spanish overtook Czech as the second language of Texas. The University of Austin still has the largest Czech Studies department outside of the Czech Republic…  And don’t even get me started on ‘Miss Czech Texas’..

Yes, I realize that I am providing just one example here, but, I am no historian:  which is why I hope to get responses which will enlighten me.

Now that I have set the stage…

It has been suggested that one of the most important ‘behind-the-scenes’ reasons for the First World War was the absence of proper regulation on

the migration of populations across political borders.

Yes, of course – there were the ‘obvious’ reasons:  but I have heard the claim that these ‘obvious’ reasons were, in fact, brought about because of the cultural instability and tensions brought about by, in practical terms, unregulated migration of populations across culturo-political borders.

It would be difficult to argue that what we are seeing now, in the EU in particular and in all of Europe in general is exactly the same type of unregulated migration of populations across cutluro-political borders!

But, it is even more pointed now than what it had been prior to WW1:  at least back then, the migrations did not tend to cross religio-cultural borders – something that is most definitely happening now.  The new migrants flooding Europe, without any true governance, are not just politically and culturally different, they are also religiously different:  subscribing to an intolerant, supremacist religion that permits exploitation and violence against non-members of said religion and refuses to recognize any culture other than its own…

Finally, the question:

Are the current, practically unregulated migration conditions into Europe as dangerous, if not more, than the ones that sparked World War 1?

Interview from Free Speech Wall event on Parliament Hill, Sept 13th, 2015

Video courtesy of Victor Laszlo.

Stephen Coughlin on “At War With Narratives Rather Than Terrorists.”

Major Stephen Coughlin will be in Montreal on Wednesday, the 16th of September, Ruby Foo’s Hotel, 7655 Decarie Blvd. .

And, he will be right here in Ottawa on Thursday, 17th of September, at the Lord Elgin Hotel, 100 Elgin Street, at 7pm.

Both events are brought to you by Act!ForCanada.

Photos from Free Speech Wall event on Parliament Hill, 13th of September, 2015, 1-3 pm

Yeay!

The photos, courtesy of Victor Laszlo, are here!!!

Me and my Free Speech Wall

Me and my Free Speech Wall

The red pouch in the table contains writing tools.  The red bits on The Wall are the text of Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code of Canada, which I was to ‘display prominently’ so as not to ‘entrap’ people into accidentally getting arrested for thinking they can write anything they want on a Free Speech Wall.

This is how prominently my Free Speech Wall was displayed on the Parliament Hill

This is how prominently my Free Speech Wall was located on the Parliament Hill

Hey, at least you can see the Canadian flag behind me – that has to count for something, right?

The RCMP vehicle in the right part of the picture is my protection team.

Parliament Hill of Canada, 13th of September, 2015

Parliament Hill of Canada, 13th of September, 2015

Another RCMP officer ensuring peace on The Hill.

The one guy who dared to visit my display - but not to write on it...

The one guy who dared to visit my display – but not to write on it…

He had a permit of his own to demonstrate – but he could go anywhere, so he came to check me out.  My display was deemed too provocative and dangerous to bystanders (as well as my RCMP guards), so I had been limited to this corner.

The rope people would have to 'hop over' to get to see my Free Speech Wall - along with the RCMP dutifully watching that nobody breaks any rules or laws

The rope people would have to ‘hop over’ to get to see my Free Speech Wall – along with the RCMP dutifully watching that nobody breaks any rules or laws

Apparently, slightly lowering the rope between these two supports (not even ones closest to my display) was ‘sufficient’ to ensure ‘public access’ to my Free Speech Wall.  In the background, you can see RCMP Constable watching the dip in the rope very, very closely indeed:  to provide appropriate security.

All these photos are courtesy of Victor Laszlo.

For full write-up of the day, please see my report here.

Reporting on the Free Speech Wall

UPDATE:  Courtesy of Victor Laszlo, photos from today can be seen here.

Today is the day!

Sunday, September 13th!

Today, I have a permit to hold my Free Speech Wall on Parliament Hill, from 1 to 3 pm!

With 30 minutes ahead to set up and 30 minutes after for teardown.

EXCITING!!!

I wish I could report that it was a beautiful, warm and sunny autumn day.  But, I woke up to cold sleet, the gray rain  drumming loudly on my window…  Ah, well – still excited!!!

*   *   *

All the ‘political demonstrations, rallies and other events’ are supposed to take place on the ‘middle walkway’.

If you are unfamiliar with Canada’s Parliament Hill, here is a picture:

As you can see, the front of The Hill is sort of shaped like a wide horseshoe, with a central walkway bisecting the lawn into Eastern and Western halves.  Since this is a hill, and the lawn is flat, the central walkway leads from the Centennial Flame Fountain towards the Peace Tower with a flight of steps at the top, to bring the walkway up to the level of the roadway in front of the Parliament Buildings.  The retaining wall between this roadway and the level of the lawn is fronted by decorative bushes and flowers.  Yes, red and white flowers:  this is Canada!

So, most political thingies are supposed to be located on the central walkway itself, which is wide enough for a set of tents and tables to be along one edge without impeding the pedestrian traffic.  I’ve been to The Hill many times when this was happening – never did this cause traffic problems.

Nothing is supposed to be located on the stairs themselves, unless there is a special permission for that:  which only makes sense.  I have been at events where the stairs are used in place of a dais and it works very well – just that the RCMP has to be on hand to ensure there are no traffic jams.

OK.

My event, however, was considered by the RCMP to be ‘highly provocative’ and might expose ‘innocent people’ to being shot if I were to locate my Free Speech Wall in this high traffic area.  Wanting to be as cooperative as possible, I readily agreed to set up my Free Speech Wall on the Eastern Lawn, in the North-Eastern-most corner, right in front of the decorative bushes and flowers – and about 5-10 meters in from the Eastern path up The Hill, with my ‘Wall’ facing South.  This was where I had agreed to have been set up for the International Draw Muhammed Day event, so…

OK.

I arrived at the Eastern Gate to The Hill at 12:30 on the dot.  Luckily, the downpour had given way to a chilly drizzle alternating with light showers, so that was good.  Very good!

RCMP Constable Gregory Welsh was already there, waiting for me.  With some helpers, I brought my stuff (OK, they brought most of it) to my spot.  To get there, Constable Greg had to untie a rope which acted as a barrier, preventing people from going from the walkway onto the lawn and then he closed it behind us – I guessed to protect us from the throngs of people while we were setting up.

Constable Greg also informed me there was going to be ‘some religious thing’ going on on the stairs, which turned out to be a group of Messianic Jews singing and praying and blowing some weird twisty horn thingies – so, perfect atmosphere for celebrating freedoms of all kinds!  Very exciting!!!

First, the folding table – to keep everything out of the puddles in the grass.

I lay my three permitted cardboard panels, protected in plastic, onto the table and set up my one permitted lawnchair to keep the rest of my props from being drowned, and we set about putting up the gazebo-tent thingy which S/Sgt Roussel generously, out of the goodness of his heart, permitted to be used (but only in the case of rain).  This was the tricky bit – the sand from its last use was making extending the legs a little tricky.  But, with help from two of my tall voluntolds, we got it done!

Popping the tent over the table and wiping it dry, I went about connecting up my three panels and putting up the last few pages that overlapped the panel-breaks.

Explanation is needed, I think…

S/Sgt Roussel had, during our meeting, asked if I would prevent people from writing anything on my Free Speech Wall that might contravene Sections 318 and 319 of Canada’s Criminal Code – the Hate Speech provision.  I pointed out that this would, kind of, defeat the purpose of actually having a Free Speech Wall!

Knowing from an earlier interview that I had been a political refugee, having been born in Czechoslovakia, he demanded:  “So, if somebody wanted to write:  ‘rape all Czechoslovakian women’, you would not stop them?”

My response, understandably, was:  “Of course I would not stop them!”

We went back and forth like that for a while – I’m sure most free speech loving people have had a version or two of this conversation with bannies (people who like to ban things) and their bureaucratic minions.

When they realized I would not stop people from exercising their Constitutional right to Free Speech on my Free Speech Wall, Constable Greg had given me a copy of Sections 318 and 319 of Canada’s Criminal Code, which he had prepared earlier.  I had to promise to S/Sgt Roussel that, in order for me not to entrap people into accidentally getting arrested by writing something forbidden, I would prominently display these laws on my Wall.

So that everybody would have fair warning.

Because if there were a crime in progress, they would have to pull the plug on the event, confiscate my wall and start arresting people.  When I pointed out that without being arrested, citizens could not challenge bad laws in court, S/Sgt Roussel lost control of his facial expression for a while and, while he muttered:  “You’ll never get any laws changed” under his breath, his face showed amused contempt.

It seemed to me that, at this very moment, S/Sgt Roussel decided to make sure things went so smoothly that no arrest would be made.

Well, I myself would not want anybody to get arrested through ignorance of the law either – and on my account to boot!

So, of course, I complied!

I took S/Sgt Roussel’s exact quote – and had him inspect it and confirm I got it right – and then, under the heading of this quote (one side in English, the other en Francais – this is Canada, non?) I posted the exact wording of the Crimnal Code of Canada’s sections 318 and 319.  It was some of these pages that overlapped the ‘seams’ of my 3 permitted cardboard panels – and which I had to attach on site.

Printed on red paper – so people could see it is a warning from a proverbial mile away!

When the clock on the Peace Tower chimed 1 pm, I had everything set up.  The three cardboard panels, connected as they were, turned out to be a bit of a sail (it was windy) so I strengthened the cardboard supports built into them by sticky taping them to the table.  I set out a brand new set of markers in front, my chair beside the table – and all was set to go!

Constable Greg came to check it all out and and confirmed everything was done exactly as the RCMP had told me to do it.

I said good, we were ready, and could he please now remove the rope that separates the lawn from the walkway:  just between two of the nearest supports, so there would be a gateway for people to get to me.

To my great surprise, Constable Greg refused.  He would not look me in the eye when he told me that the rope was low enough for people to just hop across it!!!

If the RCMP was worried I would be swamped with people had they made it clear that people were not forbidden from walking on the wet grass, they succeeded 100%!!!

A lot if people looked at my display, then at the rope, then at the many RCMP officers watching me – and them – and decided to walk on.  Only the one guy with a Jesus sign, whom I had seen during my interview with the RCMP on The Hill earlier, had the guts to come over – out of curiosity…..but that was it.  Even he chose not to write anything on The Wall – under the watchful eye of the RCMP.

Given the implications of Bill C-51, I can’t really blame him!

Oh, yes.  One brave media person (and no, Rebel Media, though well aware of this event, chose not to cover it) interviewed me – I hope to have pics and or video soon.

In the meantime, here is my potato quality flip-phone picture of the ‘Gate’ to my Free Speech Wall – the rope people could ‘just hop across’:

The Rope people could hop over

And, here is a blurry picture of my Free Speech Wall itself:  the red bits are the lists (English and French) of what is forbidden and the White area is the Free Speech Area itself.  And, yes, Constable Greg had looked it over and agreed that this is exactly what the RCMP had asked me to do.

Free Speech Wall

It was so peaceful, I hope to do this again next spring!

Edit:  I forgot to say what S/Sgt Roussel’s exact quote was:

“Freedom of speech, yes…

….but there is a line in the sand!”

Knowing that this warning implies the use of maximum military force if ‘the line in the sand ‘ is crossed, and knowing S/Sgt Roussel commands a lot of people armed to the teeth, I had to take his warning very seriously indeed…

If you cannot make it to the Parliament Hill on Sunday…

This Sunday, the 13th of September, I will be holding a Free Speech Wall event on Ottawa’s Parliament Hill between 1 and 3 pm.

Everyone is welcome!!!

However, a number of people have contacted me, saying they cannot make it for logistical reasons.

A number of people have also contacted me, saying they will not come because the security on The Hill is handled by the RCMP, and with Bill C-51 looming ‘out there’, they fear they might come up on the RCMP’s ‘radar’ and be in danger because of that legislation…

To top this off, my very even-keeled, engineer husband keeps stressing to me that he hopes I make it through this even without getting myself killed….

Yes, we have come to the point in our society where even ‘normal’ people worry that expressing support for Freedom of Speech will get a person arrested or killed!!!

Is this really the society we want to leave to our children?!?!?

If you will be unable – or unwilling – to attend the event on Sunday due to fears for your safety, please, leave your message in the comments, I will print it out, and post it on the wall anonymously on your behalf.

Stephen Coughlin in Ottawa Thursday, September 17th

ActForCanada is bringing

Major Stephen Coughlin

Thursday, September 17th

Ottawa, Ontario

Time:                          7:00 p.m.

Location:                    Lord Elgin Hotel

Address:                     100 Elgin Street

Ticket Price:               $15.00 (students free)

Stephen’s new book,

CATASTROPHIC FAILURE

Blinding America in the face of Jihad

 will be available for sale.

The price is $30 Canadian.

Payment by cheque or cash.

For further information, please email  info@actforcanada.ca

https://youtu.be/3IFa_yW6w4k

Photos of dead toddler, Aylan Kurdi, were staged (updated with retraction)

UPDATE:  The AG News report I had relied on for the report of the staging of little Aylan’s body has now retracted the story.  It is most important to keep the truth up front – I’d rather learn the truth before winning an argument any time.  The rest of my rant seems, at least for now, to be factually correct.

*   *   *

By now, everyone in the world (with internet access or not) has seen the heart-tugging pictures of poor little Aylan Kurdi’s drowned body on the sandy beach, demonstrating the human tragedy that results from this mass migration into Europe.

And a human tragedy it is.

But, as so often happens with emotionally charged stories, the first victim becomes the truth:  especially if the narrative  can manipulate the audience into somehow feeling good about themselves.

How can a child’s tragic death be used to make millions of Westerners feel good about themselves?

I will get to it.

First, please indulge me in reporting some of the truths of this incident.

The little boy’s name is not, in fact, Aylan Kurdi.  His name is Aylan Shenu.  ‘Kurdi’ is a reference to the fact that he is of Kurdish background and would perhaps be best translated as ‘Aylan, the Kurd’.

But, since the ‘Kurdish cause’ is currently in vogue in The West, the ‘Kurdi’ nomiker evokes the proper emotions in the Western audience and therefore, even in death, the little boy is stripped of his individuality, his own identity, in favour of playing up group politics.

Please, do not mistake my identification of the Kurdish cause as being in vogue in The West as any comment as to its rightness or wrongness:  not in the least.  In this particular article, I refuse to examine the source of the conflict and my opinions about it because this post is not about that!

It is about how a young child death was unnecessary, preventable and senseless – and how even in death he is stripped of his dignity by being used as a theatrical prop on the world stage!!!

Ok, now that we have his correct name, let’s stick to it:  Aylan Shenu.

Wikipedia claims his first name is ‘Alan’, not ‘Aylan’, but they also claim his last name is ‘Kurdi’ and a lot of other factual errors can be found in their article, so I’m just noting this for completeness, not because I’m buying their version.

The next lie is that the family had tried to come to Canada and been turned down – and that is why they had to resort to this desperate boat ride.  The family had never applied for entry to Canada.

As per the family itself – not just some lame bureaucrat’s claim.

But the family was fleeing war, right?

Wrong!  The family had received free housing in Turkey of 3 years – the length of little Aylan Shenu’s life – and not been in any warn-torn, or even violence-threatened area.

Still, the conditions were so bad, they were escaping to save their lives, yes?

No!  The family was hoping to go to Finland because they wanted to get dental care paid for by the Finish State rather than using the $5,000 their aunt had sent them from Canada to get their teeth fixed up.  It was his parents’ greed – not war – that had caused the death of little Aylan Shenu!!!

And, to make sure his family had cut to the front of the line in the refugee application system, Abdullah, Aylan’s father, had sent his wife and children in first, alone, so that a lone mother and children would get help first.  Then, under ‘family reunification’ program, he’d join them…

That manipulative greedy pig of a father was never even on the boat!!!

But, ‘greedy father wants free dental care and sends wife and babies on risky journey to cut in the refugee cue’ is nowhere near as pretty a narrative as ‘babies drown trying to escape war’…

More importantly, even though the true account of the event might evoke anger towards that {insert expletives of choice here} father, it would have no way of making the Western audience feel good about themselves.  So, it would not sell nearly as many papers…and that’s before we get into the geo-political usefulness of the narrative over the truth.

Yet, if the media could spin this as a tragedy of those fleeing The Horrors of War – Westerners COULD be made feel better about themselves!

Just urge them to accept more migrants into their countries, welcome them, open their hearts and homes to them – then THEY will be DOING something ‘GOOD’.  And thus feel good about themselves!!!

So, this narrative sells!

Of course, the fact that the UN openly states that it wants to undermine national homogeneity of EU member states – they’ve been saying this for a while now.

Which is exactly what this massive invasion is doing:  who hasn’t seen the videos of migrants in Hungary chanting ‘Allahu Akhbar’ and ‘fuck you’ at the Hungarians as they destroy the food and water being distributed to them has not only failed to do their due diligence, they are guilty of wilful ignorance!

And Hungary is not the only place where the migrants are refusing donated food – videos from Germany where angry, young, able-bodied migrant are throwing it into garbage bins or pouring it on the ground in front of the very people who worked tirelessly to gather these donations for them abound!

Now, I speak as an immigrant:  I went through the UN refugee camp in Traiskirchen and it was a tough place, to say the least.  35 years later, I still get ‘immigrant dreams’ now and then and, to be honest, even my family has still not heard about all that I had experienced on my journey from my birthplace to my home in Canada.  So, I understand what immigrants go through, how dehumanizing the process can be.

Yet, never ever, in my wildest dreams, would we have behaved as these thugs do!

Yes, the food was not always the tastiest or according to what we were used to, but it was given to us out of the goodness of the heart of the givers – we were grateful for it!  Beggars cannot be choosers…but these beggars are turning into bullies!

But, I digress.  This is not my story – this is the story of little Aylan Kurdi Shenu.

So, the UN wants to erase the very thing that drove Europe into its technological and scientific progress:  the competition between its nation states, driven by the rivalry between the various nationalities.

The media, who buy in to the UN’s politics, can not only advance its ideological aim, they can also financially benefit from twisting the true facts of the death of poor little Aylan Shenu.

And if there ever was a doubt about this being anything else, please, consider this, most telling fact:  before the most heart-wrenching photos of little Aylan were taken, his body was specifically and intentionally posed!

Yes, original photos of him being found demonstrate that the widely published images are the results of the poor little tyke’s body being intentionally posed so as to evoke the most emotional response possible.

And it worked…

That truly is a human tragedy!

Free Speech Wall – September 13th, 2015, 1-3 pm, Parliament Hill, Ottawa

Yes!

WE ARE ON!!!

I have received the permission from the powers that be to hold my Free Speech Wall event on the Parliament Hill.

So, please, mark your calendars, and help spread the word!!!

Free Speech Wall

Date:  September 13th, 2015 (the Sunday following 9/11)

Time: 1 pm to 3 pm

Where:  Parliament Hill, Ottawa, Canada

Location:  North-Eastern corner of the Front Lawn

OK, there are a few little things to ‘iron out’, but I am sure it will be a success!

Please, bring all your friends and let’s exercise our free speech, as best as we can!!!