From tragedy to helping others: story of a real-life hero

What would you do if your spouse and children were murdered by terrorists?

This is the story of what Dr. Chandra Sankurathri did  when his family died in the Air India 183 bombing

First, he grieved for his wife Manjari and children, Sirikan (7) and Sarada (4).  He grieved long and deeply.

Then he found a way to make sure they were never forgotten – in this best way possible.

This scientists went back to his wife’s birthplace in India and, using funds he raised by opening a charitable organisations which bears her name:  the Manjari Sankurathri Memorial Foundation (MSMF), he opened a school for kids who would otherwise not be able to get an education!

He named the school for his daughter, Sarada.

Though the doors of life closed on his daughter, a school bearing Sarada’s name opened the doors to a new, better life for hundreds of children.  What a worthy legacy!

But, Dr. Chandra did not stop there.

He noticed that many of the poorest people in the region could not earn a living because they were blind.  Being a scientist, he analysed the problem and soon realized that the leading cause of blindness were cataracts or other treatable conditions.

Devoting much energy to this, he added an eye clinic to the school: the bus, once it brought the pupils to school, could then bring the blind to the clinic where they are treated.

The clininc, named after his son, quickly grew into the Srikiran Institute of Opthalmology.

I admit it:  I am a bit of a softie!

When I see people selflessly helping others, I cannot but be touched by their devotion to the cause of humanity.  Yes, I do wish I could live up to the standards they set:  and, yes, I also know I am not strong enough to!  I doubt that most of us could only aspire to their strength!

And, when you see someone suffer a personal tragedy of this magnitude – a tragedy which resulted from human avarice and hate – and give your loved ones memory meaning through helping others, I cannot but see this person as a real-life hero!

So, I cannot but respect and admire them – and their work.

Letting everyone else know about them – and their work – is the least I can do!

If YOU would like to help Dr. Chandra in his work – and enjoy the most delicious Indian food EVER, here is your chance!

I speak of nothing other than the annual MSMF fundraising picnic, coming up in Ottawa on Saturday, the 13th of June, 2009.

I have gone to this picnic many many times:  the people are friendly and the food is, well, really, really awesome!

All the food is prepared on-site (the Andrew Haydon Park).  Some of it is made – and donated – by the best Indian restaurants in Ottawa.  But, the best dishes are the ones prepared by some of the best Indian cooks in the world:  but whose cooking you can only taste if you are invited to their home, or if you come to this picnic!

If you cannot come, you can still help!  (Sorry, you’ll miss out on the food – but, if you’d like, I’ll describe it for you afterwards!)

So, if you happen to be in the Ottawa area, you just might want to drop in, enjoy some awesome food – and be a part of something great at the same time!

Doors-open Ottawa

This is actually a really awesome thing!

Doors-open Ottawa is a weekend when all kinds of neat places open their doors and let us, the ‘unwashed masses’, peek in!

OK – so, many of the places are quite familiar:  the Hindu Temple, the Ottawa Mosque, the Gurdwara, many of the Churches….

But – a lot of the really awesome science labs are open, too!  From CANMET (see granite blocks crushed before your eyes – and get a fragment as a souvenier) to the bug labs (Canada’s ONLY nematode taxonomist explains the intricacies of his profession – on a tour guided by one of Marc Garneau’s distant cousins!)

This is a really awesome thing!

The only criticism?  Putting it on the last weekend before high-school exams keeps a lot of young people who could benefit from learning about the ‘reality’ of various choices in education/professions because they have to study – in order to have high-enough grades to make it into schools that prepare them for these types of careers!

The future of broadband in Canada: have a voice!

Tim Denton, the CRTC commissioner, has recently made the following statement:

‘The rights of Canadians to talk and communicate across the Internet are vastly too important to be subjected to a scheme of government licensing. If more Canadians were aware how close their communications have come to being regulated by this Commission, not by our will but because we administer an obsolete statute, they would be rightly concerned. Fortunately, good sense prevailed and the evidence for intervention was not yet present. But this confluence of facts may not always be there. Thus the call for a government review of a digital transition strategy is both wise and opportune. Let us fix this problem.’


via Michael Geist

And while I do not believe that the CRTC has the right to control our wavelengths, the reality is that they do.  And, to their credit, they have (as Michael Geist’s post puts it so eloquently), decided to keep their hands off the internet – for now.

But, they will go on to develop a new comprehensive national digital strategy…

All of our voices should be heard, to help ensure that the net truly remains neutral – or, at least as neutral as possible.  This is important:  still, most of us are not sure how to best be heard…

Which is why I am going to quote the following text from Campaign for Democratic Media almost in its entirety:

Citizens from coast to coast are expected to engage in Canada’s first-ever online LIVE video-streamed national conversation about the future of broadband in this country.

During Town Hall meetings in Toronto, Ottawa and Vancouver, viewers can take part in the confab through live, real-time online chat available at theREALnews.com, rabble.ca, TheTyee, Beyond Robson, SaveOurNet.ca and other participating websites.

The first of these innovative town hall meetings takes place in Toronto on Monday, June 8. The participating websites will start streaming video at 7:30 p.m.

The town hall events will bring together web innovators, entrepreneurs, social change leaders, cultural workers and citizens to discuss the future of the Internet in Canada. The sessions will be recorded and will form part of the citizen testimony that SaveOurNet.ca’s Steve Anderson will use to guide his presentation to the CRTC at the July 6 traffic management hearing.

SaveOurNet.ca is encouraging people who live within commuting distance to attend the town hall sessions to meet and mingle with fellow Netizens who want a say in Canada’s future Internet.

Here are the details, along with some updated information:

TORONTO • June 8 • 7 p.m.
The Gladstone Hotel, 1214 Queen St. West

Speakers include:
Mark Surman, Executive Director, Mozilla Foundation
Olivia Chow, NDP Member of Parliament
Steve Anderson, co-founder, SaveOurNet.ca
Rocky Gaudrault, CEO, Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Derek Blackadder, National Representative with CUPE

Special guests:
Jesse Brown, Search Engine
David Skinner, Communications Professor, York University
Kim Elliot, Rabble.ca
Mark Kuznicki, remarkk consultant
Dan O’Brien, ACTRA
Ben Lewis, Canadian Federation of Students
Wayne Mcphail, w8nc

REGISTER TO RESERVE A SEAT: http://saveournet.ca/toronto

OTTAWA • June 10 • 7 p.m.
Ottawa Public Library Main Branch, 120 Metcalfe St.

Speakers include:
Michael Geist, Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, University of Ottawa, blogger
Charlie Angus, NDP MP, Heritage and Culture critic
Rocky Gaudrault, CEO, Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Bill St. Arnaud, Chief Research Officer for CANARIE Inc.

Introduction by Steve Anderson, co-founder, SaveOurNet.ca
Discussion Facilitator: Marita Moll, TeleCommunities Canada

Special guests:
Mike Gifford, founder of Open Concept Consulting Inc. Leslie Regan Shade, Communications Professor, Concordia University Graham Cox, Canadian Federation of Students

REGISTER TO RESERVE A SEAT: http://saveournet.ca/ottawa

VANCOUVER • June 20 • (time to be determined)
Vancouver ChangeCamp, BCIT, downtown campus, 555 Seymour St.

Speakers include:
Rocky Gaudrault, CEO, Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Steve Anderson, co-founder, SaveOurNet.ca
(More to come)

REGISTER TO RESERVE A SEAT: http://vanchangecamp.eventbrite.com/

Canada’s FIRST live INTERNET DANCE PARTY will hit Vancouver on Saturday, June 20! This is a fundraiser for host SaveOurNet.ca as well as the official after party for VanChangeCamp.

6 to 8 p.m. – Social & Film Screening
8 p.m. to 2 a.m. – Internet Dance Party
Gallery Gachet

Special Guests:
Quest Poetics feat: Mello Black, Mario Vaira, & DJ Hayze
More guests to be announced soon!

RESERVE A SPOT: http://internetdanceparty.eventbrite.com/

Join the Facebook group of your local Town Hall:
http://saveournet.ca/content/town-hall-facebook-groups

Organizing these events would not be possible without your contributions. Please donate today:
http://saveournet.ca/donate

If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Campaign for Democratic Media.

Food Aid day

Today, Ottawa is holding its Food Aid Day.

This is about people helping people!

Local food bank is buying cows from local farmers – ‘on the hoof’, so to speak – and the farmers are matching the purchase with an equal donation.  The beef gets made into packets of ground beef and is given to people who come to the Ottawa Food Bank for help.

This was originally thought up when local farmers were having a difficult time selling their beef, because of the ‘mad cow’ issue:  even thoug no Ontario cattle were ill, their export market dissappeared.  Now that the farmers are doing better, they are donating cattle and giving help back to the community which helped them in difficult times.

Oh, and Laureen Harper – the Prime Minister’s wife – will be just one of the movers-and-shakers participating in a cow-milking competition as part of this fundraiser!

I like good stories like this.

Lily of the valley

The other day, I was in my front ‘shade’ garden…

… when an elderly couple inquired if I ‘needed help’!

I sat up, pulled my camera down and embarrassed the kind folks… I was just taking some pictures of my flowers!

Of course, lily of the valleys are pretty low – so, to get the best shots (the sun was just setting, and I ‘had to’ capture that ‘kiss’ of ‘setting sunlight’ on the delicate blossoms…), I had to be lying down in the grass, and angling myself for the ‘best shot’!

I suppose it is easy to mistake an amateur photographer’s attempts to get the ‘perfect shot’ with random writhing in pain…art hurts, and all that…

Enjoy!

(Updated to include the title…and fix some spelling….)

Lilly of the valley

Lily of the valley

more lilly of the valley....

more lily of the valley....

even more lilly of the valley

even more lily of the valley

Blazing Catfur reports the cuisine was the highlight of the evening

A most excellent report by my favourite feline, Blazing Catfur, about an evening spent at the house that Bangash built…

‘My mission’s purpose? Report on the fundraising event for Mohamed Elmasry’s nascent online magazine the Canadian Charger featuring Islamist gadabout Yvonne Ridley.’

Complete with photos!

Pat Condell: ‘Children of a Stupid God’

Here is Pat Condell’s latest video, ‘Children of a Stupid God’.  Whatever your belief-system (or lack thereof), he does bring up an intersting perspective…and a few good points for thought:

Al Jazeera in English – an email campaign to lobby the CRTC

Tonight, my hubby received the following email:


From: Campaign for Democratic Media – democraticmedia@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM
Subject: Canada needs Al Jazeera!
To:[name redacted]

Broadcast Diversity

We want Al Jazeera English!

Al Jazeera English is being considered for airing in Canada by the CRTC, the federal broadcast regulator. Tell the CRTC to give its approval to list AJE as an “eligible” service so that Canadian cable and satellite companies can carry it.

The CRTC has begun a 30-day consultation period when Canadians are being asked whether AJE should be allowed in Canada. Comments must be received by the CRTC no later than Monday, June 8.

Al Jazeera English is renowned for its high journalistic standards; for its fearless, unembedded reporting, including in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; for giving a global voice to the South; for speaking truth to power; and for its diversity of voices from around the world.p>

Tell the CRTC that you want to see Al Jazeera English in Canada.

Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):
CRTC Commissioners

Below is the sample letter:

Subject: Canada needs Al Jazeera!

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],

I urge you to approve Al Jazeera English’s application to broadcast in Canada.

Canadians live in one of the world’s most multicultural and diverse countries. It is important for Canadians to be able to get the diversity of perspectives AJE offers in its unique mix of international news, current affairs and documentaries. Al Jazeera English has 69 bureaus and already broadcasts in more than 100 countries. AJE has more than 1,200 highly experienced staff from nearly 50 nationalities including more than 45 ethnicities, making Al Jazeera English’s newsroom the most diverse in the world.

AJE offers balanced news coverage and has been widely credited for giving a global voice to the South. The Canadian audience is internationally minded and in this globalized age, people want news from all corners of the Earth.

Al Jazeera English will open a Canadian news bureau if it is permitted to broadcast in Canada. This will make AJE the only international broadcas ter located in Canada making Canadian stories available to the world.

Al Jazeera English is acclaimed for its diversity and quality in journalism. Canadians’ communication rights, including the right to receive and impart information regardless of frontiers (Article 19 of the UN’s Declaration of Human Rights), demand that the award-winning Al Jazeera English be approved for broadcasting in Canada. Thank you.

Sincerely,
[name redacted]

cc:
Campaign for Democratic Media
Ethnic Channels Group

Take Action!
Instructions:
Click here to take action on this issue
Tell-A-Friend:
Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
Tell-a-Friend!

What’s At Stake:

Al Jazeera English requires CRTC permission to be able to broadcast in Canada.

If it wins CRTC approval, AJE will open a Canadian news bureau, making it the only international broadcaster telling our stories to the world.

Al Jazeera English is acclaimed for its diversity and quality in journalism. Canadians have the right to receive and impart information regardless of frontiers (Article 19 of the UN’s Declaration of Human Rights).
Campaign Expiration Date:
June 9, 2009


If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Campaign for Democratic Media.

Personally, I am torn…  I am not particularly keen on the whole ‘Al Jazeera English’ getting any ‘official blessing’ from anyone.

At the same time, I reject the very notion that the CRTC has ANY jurisdiction over the ‘airwaves’:  as such, lobbying them for – or against – anything would amount to a recognition of their jurisdiction, and thus something I find morally unacceptable.

Still, I thought this interesting enough to let everyone make their own minds up about!


add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank

Lisa McLeod testifies in court that she is a crooked politician

OK – as much as I hate to admit it, Warren Kinsella has scored a point in the ‘Larry O’Brien influence peddling trial’.  Not the one he intended to – but, he has scored…

For those who are unfamiliar with Warren Kinsella, he is a Liberal spin doctor whose favourite tactic is to make up a charge (especially if there is a ‘grain of truth to it’ – even if NOT in the way he formulates it), throw it at his masters’ political opponents, and see if any of the excrement sticks…  A dubious tactic at best, it is – in my never-humble-opinion, precisely this tactic that is at the root of the ‘Mayor Larry O’Brien’ trial.

It is obvious that the main targets of this particular feces-slinging tactic were John Baird (the Conservative Minister, and a long-time rival of the past – ‘labour-union- and-Chretien- Liberals-friendly’ Ottawa Mayor, Bob Chiarelli) and the high-tech enterpreneur and philantropist turned Ottawa Mayor Larry O’Brien, who ran on a platform of curbing the power of labour unions over the policies of the City of Ottawa.  Little Lisa McLeod, though a well-connected conservative, was hardly in the cross-hairs of this particular salvo.

Yet…

She is the one who just might have ended her political career with her yesterday’s testimony at the trial!

HOW???

In no uncertain terms, Ms. McLeod testified that she is a crooked politician!

No, she did not actually say those words…  But, even a rudimentary amount of logic and reasoning applied to her testimony leads one to the inevitable conclusion that she is, indeed, a corrupt politician who ought to be run out of town and never ever elected again.  (And, if you read my blog regularly, you will know I say this as a ‘little ‘c’ conservative’ who abhores the excesses of various Liberal governments!)

So, what was it that Lisa McLeod said that has lead me to this extreme loathing?

While testifying at Larry O’Brien’s trial, Lisa McLeod stated the following (according to CFRA’s reporter of the trial Anna Drahovzal’s report on Thursday morning – the interview is not yet available on the CFRA site at the time this is being written).  But, to the best of my recollection of her report….

  • Lisa McLeod had, during a ‘casual conversation’ with Larry O’Brien, noticed that he spoke of Terry Kilrea ‘as if he were no longer a candidate’ for the Mayor’s chair.
  • Larry O’Brien – according to Lisa McLeod – said “we are talking to Terry about an appointment”
  • Lisa McLeod testified that she BELIEVED (not KNEW, but ‘BELIEVED’) that this ‘appointment’ was to do with the ‘parole board’ (Larry O’Brien is charged with attempting to bribe Terry Kilrea with a ‘parole board’ appointment to drop out of the Mayoral race so as not to split the right-of-centre vote).
  • Under cross-examination from the defense attorney, Ms. McLeod’s memory of the events was questioned:  in particular, she was asked if the numerous ‘smear-stories’ published in the local newspapers at about this time about the ‘parole board appointment’ could have affected her ‘belief’ in what the ‘appointment’ was in reference to…
  • While admitting that she could not be sure, Ms. McLeod testified that after this particular conversation, she intentionally avoided all media coverage of this controversy/scandal, because she thought this would go to trial and she did not want her memory to be tainted…

Please, think about this!!!

And, consider the ‘other’ testimonies… that when O’Brien was approached by Kilrea to get him ‘the parole board appointment’, O’Brien asked ‘people’ (as in, his lawyer and some politicians) about this:  ALL of them told him this would be illegal and he must not be seduced into any firm offer along these lies.  As a matter of fact, the testimonies so far are that all the ‘politicians’ he asked for advice ‘screamed’ at him to ‘not touch this’!

McLeod DID NOT!!!

Now, before you think her naive or anything like that, please, consider her own testimony in court!

She BELIEVED this was ILLEGAL – because she claims that she intentionally avoided media coverage of this in order not to taint her memory of the event for when it went to trial.  This PROVES that SHE was convinced this was an ILLEGAL action (whether it WAS or NOT – that is up to the courts….but, her statement PROVES that SHE thought that Larry O’Brien was taking an illegal action)!

Yet, she did NOT go to the police!!!

Now, if I were to witness something I considered to be ‘illegal action’ – I would be VERY CLEAR that I would bring all of this to the attention to the police.  And, as soon as possible, I WOULD inform the police of this!

Lisa McLeod HAD TESTIFIED that she witnessed what SHE believed was an illegal action (she thought ‘it would come to trial’), yet she did NOT report it to the police!

That means one of two possible things:

  1. She was so used to politicians using ‘illegal’ means to become elected, she thought it ‘normal’ enough not to report the crime to the police
  2. OR… she was not willing to call the cops when she thought the ‘illegal action’ was taken by a person who was a political ally….putting her partisanship above the law!!!

BOTH of these options are ABOMINABLE!!!

In not so many words, Lisa McLeod has PROVEN that she is NOT WILLING to put the law above her own political ambition…

And THAT makes HER a CROOKED POLITICIAN!

At least, that is my never-humble-opinion…..

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank

I’ve been tagged with ‘Have you read these banned books?’

Over the weekend, I posted about a young woman – known only as ‘Kat Atreides‘ – who has turned her locker into an ‘underground library’, lending out books banned by her high school (presumably in the USA).

It seems that people are wondering about which of these banned books others have read – or why they have not read some of them.  And, it would appear that ‘tagging’ people with this question is ‘today’s internet meme’…and I’ve been tagged (The Landed Underclass ):

“Have you read these banned books?  If not, why not?”

  • The Perks of Being a Wallflower
    • This is the first time I ever heard of this book by Steven Chobsky… but, as Wikipedia claims it is ‘inspired’ by ‘The Catcher in the Rye’ – a book I REALLY tried to read, but could not wade through all the useless whining – I doubt I will pick this one up
  • His Dark Materials trilogy
    • My son owns the trilogy and gave it a 3/5, so I picked the first one up and started to read it.  I could not ‘buy into’ the ‘world’ the author tried to create….and I did not like the WAY the archetypes were being messed with.  So, to avoid frustration, I put the book down…
  • Sabriel
    • This is the first time I have heard of this book by Garth Nix.  I’m not much into the ‘fantasy’ world of this type: I have a hard time buying into it…
  • The Canterbury Tales
    • Of course – I read it in high-school… so, it’s been a while!  This is a good reminder to let my older son read it this summer.
  • Candide
    • I have some books by Voltaire, but ‘Candide’ is not one of them…
  • The Divine Comedy
    • Yes, of course – again, I’ve read this in my early teens.
  • Paradise Lost
    • I read bits… as part of a high-school curriculum…
  • The Godfather
    • Yes, I’ve read it.  I still have a copy – but it’s falling apart…so I don’t re-read it much.
  • Mort
    • I’m not big on Terry Pratchett… I find his writing too preachy and manipulative to be enjoyable.  Instead of reading something by Pratchett, why not read a GOOD book?
  • Interview with the Vampire
    • Nor an Ann Rice fan – really, I don’t get her books.  People cannot ‘buy into’ a mythological world when the mythology is so blatantly wrong…
  • The Hunger Games
    • This is the first time I’ve heard of this book – sounds like an interesting take on the old archetype.  I just might pick this one up…
  • The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
    • YES!!!
    • My hubby has the complete original radio series – taped off the radio
    • We have the complete original TV series on DVD
    • We still have the computer game – though we no longer have the Atari to run it on
    • We have the movie on DVD (that one’s really just for ‘completeness’)
    • When my hubby and I got married, we each had a complete set of the books…
    • Then we bought the hardcover copies – and got Douglas Adams to autograph them – and he got a great kick out of hearing we had met when we both took a physics course at University named for one of his books – and taught by a ‘Dr. Watson’!
    • Should I go on?  OK – I will!
    • I am also rather partial to the Dirk Gently series – I rather see myself in Svlad Cjelli (without the more clever, witty bits)… and I have no doubt that had ‘that school’ been familiar with them, they would have banned them….
  • A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court
    • I read this one when I was very young… and not in the original English.  My memory of it is VERY sketchy….I think I’ll pick up a copy in English now.
  • Animal Farm
    • Of course…
  • The Witches
    • Presumably, this is the Dahl book (though there are other books with that title)…  No, I did not read it nor do I plan to.  I saw part of the movie – if you want to see hate-speech, the movie is a perfect fit.  I walked out.  Then again, what do you expect from a writer who thinks that twisted, creepy dystopia of ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’ is somehow a story for kids….  I tried to read THAT book.  What is that saying?  ‘Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me….’
  • Shade’s Children
    • Sounds like this school really does not like Garth Nix and his books… I think I’ll pick this one up and give it a try.
  • The Evolution of Man
    • Which book is this?  There are a number with this title…  and, yes, I have read a bit about the evolution of humans….but, I don’t know if this book is one of the ones I read or not.
  • the Holy Qu’ran
    • While I do not know enough Arabic to read THE ‘Holy Qu’ran’, I do own a copy.  I also own a couple of translations of it into English – from the ‘official’ Saudi translation to a scholarly one which explains the ‘linguistic twists’ and their significance.  The translations, I have read – so, perhaps I’m pushing the envelope a little, but I turned the letters green to show I read it, even if only in translations.
  • One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest
    • Did not know it was also a book…
  • The Picture of Dorian Gray
    • Yes.
  • Slaughterhouse-5
    • Just not worth the time…  Kurt Vonnegut is a skilled writer who can make his worlds and characters come to life.  Too bad his ideas don’t live up to his writing skills…
  • Lord of the Flies
    • I wanted to read it – and bought the book.  But, my hubby and older son read it first, and then convinced me that I should NOT read it, because if I did, they’d have to put up with me ranting on and on about it for weeks…they thought I’d get too much ‘into’ the book.  But, I am familiar with the contents, having helped a few people write book reports on it (obviously, I helped with the ‘mechanics’ of writing the report, not the content…but was exposed to it nonetheless).
  • Bridge to Terabithia
    • Yes. (Did not see the movie…)
  • Catch-22
    • Yes.
  • East of Eden
    • Sort of….  Steinbeck is ‘sort of’ the opposite of Vonnegut:  great ideas (plot) and sense of humour, even his ‘plot timing’ is great.  It’s just the writing that sucks!  I don’t know if it is the degree to which he attempts to inject ideology into his books (something translators can negate through the means in which they translate ‘imagery’) or if it is just a complete inability to write.  However, a good translator can do wonders:  I have greatly enjoyed reading Steinbeck’s works when translated into other languages.  But in English – sorry, I just could not slog through it… even re-reading books I LOVED in the original English poisoned the books for me for ever…
  • The Brothers Grimm Unabridged Fairytales.
    • Yes.  A MUST read!

All right – YOUR turn!

add to del.icio.usDigg itStumble It!Add to Blinkslistadd to furladd to ma.gnoliaadd to simpyseed the vineTailRank