The Last Tyranny in Europe

The mainstream media is not really shouting loudly about the horrible tyranny in Belarus – which does not mean that we should simply sweep what is going on there under the rug.  We must stand up for human rights of all people – even far away in a forgotten corner of Europe…

Like Mr. Hannan, I think we should stand up and condemn what is going on there and lend moral – if not more – support to those who are actively working to improve civil liberties in Belarus.

First step, of course, is education.

If you live in Ottawa or its environs, you will soon have an excellent opportunity for educating yourself about the situation in Belarus.  On th 25th of April, 2012, at 7 pm,  the Freethinking Film Society is going to host an information evening about Belarus at the National Archives Library in Ottawa, where they will be screening ‘Europe’s Last Tyrant’:

For those on the other side of the pond, it will also be screened at the London Film Festival on April 15, 2012 in Shortwave (10 Bermondsey Square, London SE1 3UN).  For ticket info, see here. (Sorry about the late notice – just found this out myself).

For the rest:  keep your eyes open for a screening in your area. This is not something we should remain ignorant about!

An ISP we all need!

Historically, ISPs have readily handed over subscriber info to ‘authorities’ for the asking – no waiting for a warrant or such silly concepts as ‘due process’.

Subscribers had no choice in the matter:  if you wanted to hook up to the internet, the pipeline was controlled by ISPs who all placed submissiveness to authorities above protecting the civil liberties of their subscribers.  Their subscription contracts made this clear – either waive your civil liberties or get your internet service from somebody else!

Except that this condition was in all the ISPs contracts, so that there was nobody else to go to!

So much for ‘free markets’…  When all the terms of service were – at least, in this respect – almost identical, there was no consumer choice:  no way to vote with your dollar.

When civil libertarians and privacy watchdogs pointed out how these ‘industry practices’ abrogate civil liberties of the consumers and that it may, in fact, be illegal, legislators quickly passed laws to permit it.

This, in effect, permits the ISPs to share content of your email (this might be a good time to check out HushMail), your web-surfing history – heck, they can even install key-loggers and pass all that information on to agents of ‘the State’.  Expectation of privacy?  What is this ‘privacy’ thing – this word no longer exist in the dictionary!

This is about to change.  If Nick Merrill has anything to say about it, that is!

From CNET News:

‘Merrill, 39, who previously ran a New York-based Internet provider, told CNET that he’s raising funds to launch a national “non-profit telecommunications provider dedicated to privacy, using ubiquitous encryption” that will sell mobile phone service, for as little as $20 a month, and Internet connectivity.

The ISP would not merely employ every technological means at its disposal, including encryption and limited logging, to protect its customers. It would also — and in practice this is likely more important — challenge government surveillance demands of dubious legality or constitutionality.’

Which is the thing we truly need!

So, some might say, what about the ‘baddies’?  What about organized crime or terrorists or child pornographers?  They will be the first to want to take advantage of this, would they not?

Of course:  but that is why we have the police forces. It is their job to ferret these ‘baddies’ out:  but, with great power comes great responsibility.

In the case of the police, this responsibility is checked by judicial oversight.  Sure, it is more legwork – but we know that humans nature is always the weakest link in the chain, and it precisely because of human nature that these checks and balances have been instituted, it is to make sure power is not abused that due process must be followed.  Knowing the police are not taking shortcuts will even make the public trust them more, making their jobs easier, instead of the growing distrust people have that police and/or other ‘authorities’ will abuse their position to our detriment.

When agents of the State are permitted to circumvent judicial oversight and what we consider to be ‘due process’ – whether by relaxing the standards so that this becomes ‘standard’ and ‘accepted’ practice (like government agents routinely asking for – and receiving – private information about someone from a third party without judicial oversight) or by passing laws that reduce the integrity of what constitutes ‘due process’ (oh, like, say, ‘The Patriot Act’), we all loose!

I, for one, escaped from a life in a police state. It pains me greatly so see our society move – slowly, but definitely – towards the type of state which I escaped from.

So – civil-liberties-mided, customer-privacy-focused ISP providers:  COME ON!  WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR YOU!

Tim Hudak in Caledonia on 13th of March, 2012

It starts out pretty ‘vanilla’, but then it gets more colourful…

For those not familiar with Ontario politics: for the last 6 years, the community of Caledonia has been torn apart by violence as a native land claim had led to armed occupation, division of the municipality, violence and police response where law-abiding citizens were arrested for wanting to go home, because this might provoke a violent reaction from armed native occupiers.  The non-native residents of Caledonia were not the only victims:  as armed ‘warriors’ from across Canada flooded to Caledonia to flex their muscle, the law-abiding citizens of the 5 Nations Reservation were equally victimized as incidents of rape and other violence were swept under the rug while the armed thugs bullied the community…

Mr. Hudak himself is a bit of an enigma…

He is very charismatic in person – that much is undeniable.

Still, the last election was his to lose – and he did lose it, spectacularly.

On the same issue that his predecessor did:  religion in schools.

Conservatives in Canada must learn to separate religion from their policies or they will never be trusted by voters enough to be voted into power.  Mr. Hudak failed there and handed the despicable McGuinty the election victory.

Still, coming into conflict-riddled Caledonia took a lot of guts – and Hudak has raised my opinion of him both for going there and for what he had said.

Unfortunately, Mr. McHale – the man who has led the fight in Caledonia for equality before the law and against race-based policing – he behaved badly (in my never-humble-opinion).

Perhaps he was disappointed that a politician did not behave like an activist….just like his expectations that Mr. Hudak could rid us of the Ontario Human Rights Commission while he was a leader of the opposition were just a little outside of what was possible.  He certainly did not come across as the reasonable warrior for equality whose speech in Ottawa I liked and whom I admired.

Merlin – the vet who was interviewed at the end of the video – he got the measure of the situation just right!

Dan Hannan with John Robson

 

Dan Hannan with Brian Lilley on governance

Brilliant!

Dan Hannan: Bailing out banks isn’t capitalism

This is so true!

 

We keep hearing people complain about ‘capitalism’ – but what they are complaining about isn’t capitalism at all!

We live in a system where governmens practice targetted regulation, tax breaks/subsidies, bail-outs  and various other means which favour some businesses over others – as well as when the taxation schemes favour business which run inefficiently and turn little to no profit.  We live in a system where civil servants form an insular caste of their own, with salaries, pensions and other compensation roughly double the national average (which includes the high salaries of CEO’s and other wealthy executives) – and where top civil servants exercise unduinfluence over our elected officials through corrupted implementation of policies.

This is not just ‘not capitalism’ – it is everything capitalism stands against.

Yet, the more our system moves from cronyism to pure fascism, the more people demand that this ‘capitalism’ is evil!

At least call the miscreant by its proper name…

 

Government explained

My son is learning about ‘government’ in school these days…  Yes, frustrating!

I actually wrote an email to his teacher to explain that, when, on a recent assignment (and on any potential tests), he was asked to list all the positive attributes of a ‘command economy’, he said there were none, he was not displaying ignorance of the course material:  he was making a highly principled statement.  He even emailed her the Keynes vs. Hayek video – but she said she could not show it in class because it was too complicated…

Yes, our children are being brainwashed into Keynesian ideology from grade school.  (Just to underline my point:  even the spellchecker was familiar with ‘Keynes’ and ‘Keynesian’ – but not ‘Hayek’…)

Which is why I was glad to come across the following video, which explains rather well the problem with ‘government’:

Remember the old proverb:

What are the 10 most feared words in the English language?

‘We are from the government.  We are here to help!’

Law Without Government

Contrary to popular belief, this is not only possible, it is plausible.

The following video does not describe a system without flaws, but it certainly explains why ‘anarchy’ is not simply the rule of the meanest…

Daniel Hannan: Politicians can’t create jobs

This is an important point – and one that all politicians ought to be reminded of, often and firmly.

I am not an economist, so there is no way I am going to articulate this eloquently or even remotely well, but…I would not be myself if I didn’t give it a shot.

There is an old joke – very old – that could get people sent to jail if they said a variation of it back behind the iron curtain, where I grew up:

What is the fastest way to get rid of all the sand in the Sahara desert?

Create a government department with the sole purpose of supplying sand to the Sahara.  Give it a steering committee, a 5 year plan and lots of money and power to enforce policies.  For a little while, nothing will happen.  Then:  BOOM!  Sand will be more scarce in the Sahara than meat is in butcher shops!

(If you are one of the younger readers who does not remember what life behind the iron curtain was like, let me just say that butcher shops usually had very, very little to offer.  If a supply of meat was even rumoured to be coming in, people would stand in lines for hours, sometimes lining up all night just so they may be one of the first few in line in the morning because the supplies were so meager that even with limits per customer, only the first few people in line would get to buy any meat.  Bread and milk were usually available, but again, even with bread, the supply would run out before the demand.  I remember days when the limit would be set at one quarter loaf of bread per customer, so that my mom would go line up and send me to line upseparately, so we’d get half a loaf between us.  No kidding.  We had money – but there was no ‘stuff’ to buy with it.)

‘Governments creating jobs’ is one of those easy to fall into fallacies.  Like ‘the broken window’ fallacy:

The fact is that governments do not just ‘have money’ to spend:  their money comes from taxes, current or future.  Taxes are taken from people who earn it by the threat of force:  these people now no longer have that money to spend to look after themselves and their family.

Ah, say government spending proponents, but what if people want to save their money instead of spending it?  That would be bad for the economy and that is why governments must take it from them and spend it!

Isn’t that just a little oppressive?  And arrogant?

A government is supposed to represent the people and do the people’s bidding – not force people to do the government’s bidding!

The suggestion that governments should spend the people’s money because people don’t want to spend it themselves is illustrative of how the relationship between the citizens and our government has been inverted:  insted of being our servant, the government has become our master, forcing us to do what we do not want to do.

That we are proposing ‘government stimulus spending’ and ‘government creating jobs’ as desirable actions should give us a moment of pause to consider what this implies about our relationship to our governments and the status of our civil liberties!

Garry McHale arrestted again, because the sight of him ‘provoked’ someone to violence

This is the result when we stop remembering the proper roles for police, the military and the government.

The reason we have police is to uphold the laws of the land.  That is, they are the instrument of force the State uses against its civilian population to maintain its monopoly on lawmaking within their territory.  Basic, simple and clear, right?

The only legitimate role for a police force is to uphold the law – equally and without discrimination.

The only legitimate role for a police officer is to uphold the laws within the policing framework, and it is each individual officer’s personal responsibility to ensure they are not upholding the laws unequally or obeying illegal orders.  This is essential because it is the front-line police officers who are the agents of the state within this:  that is why they are the only ones who can safeguard this powerful force from corruption.

When exactly did the role of the police become re-defined from ‘enforcing the law of the land’ to ‘maintaining public peace’?

Because ‘maintaining public peace’ is not the same thing as ‘upholding the laws of the land’.  If a crowd is upset by the presence of a witch, the easiest, most cost-effective course of action for someone ‘maintaining public peace’ is to simply  burn the witch!

Most moral people would have a problem with this approach…

Yet, this is exactly what the OPP are doing in Caledonia:  faced with an angry mob, they target the person the mob is angry at instead of maintaining order by upholding the laws of the land!

People who are willing to tolerate this approach to ‘maintaining peace’, who are ‘keeping their heads down’ in the conviction this will stop the mob from going after them should remember that in Eastern and Central Europe, the witch hunters sometimes killed every man, woman and child in a village they thought was infected with witchcraft.

The ‘peace of the tomb’ is not something our society ought to be striving for.  Yet that is the logical result of the type of policing the OPP is practicing in Caledonia and many other places in Ontario!