Hera: Hercules Derangement Syndrome Background Part 2

When the Ancient Greeks would conquer another peoples, they would claim that their main God, the head of their pantheon, is just another manifestation of the Greek head god, Zeus (Romanized as Jupiter), so, there really is not that much of a difference between them.  They all worship the same capricious head god – this time, this side won, but if Zeus (by any other name) wanted, the other side would have won.  

No shame in defeat – God’s did it.  A way to ‘save face’…

We may not appreciate this now in our time, but, that is an extremely important aspect of integrating the defeated peoples’ culture into the winning one in a positive, constructive manner.

It seems that the Ancient Greeks understood (knowingly or not) that destroying a conquered culture’s ‘origin myth’ is devastating, for – what we now know – is a few generations.

So, whether by instinct, knowledge or wisdom, the Ancient Greeks avoided that.  

Instead of denigrating the defeated peoples’ mythology, they went out of their way to graft it on to their own mythology, thereby giving the conquered peoples’ a channel to integrate into the Greek culture.  This benefited both:  new blood, new ideas – but within the same overarching cultural framework that is necessary to hold a society together.

Which makes ‘integrating’ the various ‘goddess queens’ that much more difficult…(coming next)

The Zionist Limerick League

This goes back a decade or so, but, for a while, I was the President of the Zionist Limerick League.

It was not a huge movement, but, for a bit, I headed it (yes, please, all the jokes as to lack of better candidates are correct, but I hope they will also be witty, because limerick league and all).

Here is my contribution that got me elected as president:

There once was a lady in Tel Aviv

Who liked to wear her hair in a weave.

To Islam she objected

The hijab she rejected

And now the UN says she must leave.

Yes, poor poetry – but to the point politically.

Please, do contribute your best Zionist limericks here!

Monotheism vs Monolatry

This is a bit of a technical – is that the right term? – musing.

Monotheism is the belief that there is only one God.

Monolatry is the worship of only one God to the exclusion of all the others.

It is my proposition that Abrahamic religions are all a form of Monolatry and not at all Monotheism.

Abrahamic religions typically include Judaism, Christianity and Islam. There may be other off-shoots, but these three are the big ones – three of the main world religions.

So, let’s start at the beginning:

Jews made a pact with a specific God, Jehova: they will worship him exclusively and he will make them prosperous.

That is actually in the Ten Commandments: Thou shall have no other Gods before me.

OK – that clearly defines that the primary loyalty is to this particular God, but does not in any way state that this is the only God, nor does it prohibit a secondary worship of any other God(s).

In other words, it is a statement of loyalty. It is in no way a declaration of monotheism.

Islam is a bit stickier, but, please, do bear with me.

Laat and her sisters were, at one point, declared by Mohammed to be the daughters of Allah – Satanic verses and all that. So, some people argue that these verses may not have been dictated to Mohammed by Satan because he did not originally recognize any difference between these verses and the verses dictated to him by the Angel messenger of Allah.

Very controversial, so, let’s set it aside.

It has been decades since I have studied this and the easily accessible links are, well, burried too deep. But, there is a point in The Sunnah where Mohammed is said to have said that ‘Christians and Jews worship the same God – WE worship the other one’.

That is why they differentiate themselves, having a beard without a mustache, men sitting down to pee and a host of other ways to differentiate Muslims from Christians and Jews.

And this states that Islam (even if we omit the daughters of Allah) is not Monotheism but, at least, Duotheism.

Of course, I do acknowledge that there may, indeed , be monotheistic religions.

Sikhism comes to mind – but, Sikhism is an artificial religion.

It arose as Muslim armies were invading Hindu India. The king who ruled the kingdom which turned out to be a buffer-state between the Islamic invasion and the Hindu kingdoms. Having learned that Muslims would not kill monotheists, he took drastic action: he went on a hunger strike.

At the time, it was the custom of Hindu men in this kingdom to wear a ‘string’, a thin sashe, over one shoulder (think Miss Universe sashe type thing, but thinner). This king sat on one platform of a balance scale, fasting, until men of his kingdom placed their sashes on the other platform of the scale to signal they had rejected Hinduism and accepted monotheistic Sikhism…he sat there, fasting, until the weight of the sashes balanced his own.

Then, they could oppose the Muslim invaders as Monotheists and earn better terms: this was a political move, a loyalty test, and in no way a religious monotheistic belief system.

Source: I went to my local Gurdwara and let the elders teach me the history of their faith.

In conclusion: all Abrahamic faiths are all forms of monolatry, NOT monotheism. Sikhism is a political ideology in its inception, not a religious one.

I do not know of any religions that seek the nomicker ‘monotheistic’ whose doctrine actually supports this claim. If you know of some, please, do let me know and I will research it and repot back to you.

Please, do let me know your thoughts!

Why do we think God is ‘omnipotent’, ‘omniscient’?

OK, I am going on in a bit of a theological manner, but, I have had a few existential moments lately, so, perhaps that is why. For example, just a few hours ago, I was in a car accident – not hurt, just shaken a bit. A fender-bender.

The previous fender-bender I was in happened when I was taking my puppy in for cancer surgery and a philosophy student on her way to an exam lost control of her car in the snow…yes, a philosophy student.

Today’s fender-bender was minor, but the lady who backed into me in the parking lot did not understand why her car would no longer move backwards – she was so unaware that she had hit my car that she kept trying to back up into it, even as I was standing by her window and waving my arms to try to get her attention.

This sent me musing in so many directions…why do we do what we do, just how limited are we in both our observations and reasoning and why do we project so many of our fears into religions?

Because at the very root of it all, religions are about projecting fears and having them collectively assuaged. They cannot all be true – they are mutually exclusive, so…

Which makes me wonder: why do some religions – at least the most popular ones these days – have omniscient, omnipotent deities?

Yes, one per religion, that is rather definitional – cannot have two omnipotent beings, that would be a contradiction.

But, how did we arrive at this?

Ancient religions regarded Gods as sort of immortal humans with a few extra powers tossed in for good measure, but none of them were considered all powerful, all knowing…and certainly not all good.

Even the Abrahamic faiths are rooted in a view of God that is very much more limited and less unique than what most current Abrahamic worshippers I have spoken to about this are convinced of.

‘God’ did not know that Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. He had to question them to find out. He was shocked that they were hiding from him because they were ashamed of their nakedness…

Then, he rushed off to tell ‘the others’.

That is not ‘omniscient’ – or he would have known, without questioning Adam and Eve.

Then we come to ‘omnipotent’ – that directly contradicts the whole ‘free will’ idea for humans.

This one is a little more complex, so, please, bear with me.

God gives humans free will – to do as they wish, even if it means disobeying him.

But, he is also all-powerful, with the ability to control everything, yet he choses not to control the thought processes of humans.

This is a contradiction: if God wanted perfect slaves (of the mind), he could have created humans to both have freedom of thought and only think in patterns that do not cause him to condemn some of the most eternal suffering.

It is impossible to fully and willingly grant freedom of thought, then punish people with eternal suffering for exercising it – unless you are actually setting people up to fail so you can have an excuse to torture them.

So, why did we ever arrive at a point where we think God(s) are omnipotent?

Certainly not from The Bible – pick the one you prefer, from the Catholic to the Gnostic to the Old Testament: nothing in these religious texts suggests an onmiscient and omnipotent God: so, why do so many people believe that?

What does it mean ‘to be a God’?

This is not as philosophical as it might seem from the title.

Or, perhaps it is…

Whatever this is, it is the result of an actual, real-life (if I may be so bold) dream.

Yes, a dream.

Not one of them ‘pie-in-the-sky’ musings, but, actually, fully asleep, things being projected into my sleepy-consciousness type dream.

Now, there are dreams, and there are dreams.

Many different types, many different textures – if you excuse the term – to the dreams.

Some premises of dreams are nebulous, shifting realities where your mind sort of does not mind that the baseline references are so not-fixed that they shift during the dream and that is perfectly OK to the dreaming you.

One recurring dream I have had every few years had been one where I can glide over – sort of fly, I guess – glide over the ground, just millimeters above, if I just hit my stride the right way…but I can never actually show it to anyone because having an observer completely destroys my ability to ‘glide’. Yes, I understand this reveals more about me than I used to be comfortable sharing, but, well, we are talking about dreams here…

This dream, however, was unlike any other I have ever had – especially in its texture, if you know what I mean. It felt like an alternate reality, but a reality and there was no nebulous and changing quality to it.

It started innocently enough. I was there.

‘There’ was a whole ‘thing’ in and of itself.

It was not ‘here’.

Rather, it was more like a huge colony – a huge, multi-story building, spanning more area than any building I have ever experienced: you could walk for days without reaching its limits. Yet, it was an artificial environment with many, many floors – something I ‘knew’ in my dream.

OK, on the top floor, there was some eco-forming going on – making the area habitable. And, for that, there were these tiny robots, which looked a bit like a cross between bacteria and ants, that would manipulate molecules to create a human-friendly habitat. I was not really supposed to see that, as that kind of ‘gave things away’ that we were all living in an artificial habitat that was, in one way or another, a bio-lab to study us.

OK – throughout all of my life, I have been a bit of a ‘work-around-the-rules’ person.

Not necessarily because I was brave or anything, but because I often did not get that there were rules, so I broke them without understanding the implications. Same in this dream – I kept breaking the ‘unwritten’ rules.

I broke through various (think video games, but not exactly) barriers to get to lower levels of the habitat and it took me time, but I had eventually figured out that each and every one of us had a ‘governor chip’ in our brain and that each ‘floor/level’ of the habitat radiated a different ‘control’ type thingie that got picked up by the ‘governor chip’ and limited that person’s ability to reason beyond what the ‘governor’ allowed. Just did not happen – those thoughts were simply not permitted to register in the brain.

And, yes – there was a strict prohibition for people to move between the habitat levels. If people were caught, the penalty was death. But, that was also my life experience: I was born on the wrong side of the Iron Curtain and being caught trying to escape meant death. So, I get where this bit of the dream came from.

Of course, it did not stop me from trying to escape.

To escape the control over my mind.

I am not a neurotypical in real life, so, that carried over to my dream. Because I was not neuro-typical, the ‘governor-chip’ failed at controlling my mental processing – ok, bit by bit, because I sought to escape – of course – but every level lower I got to, the waves controlling the chip were different and made me ‘reason’ in completely different ways, ways that are alien to what I think reasoning is but what seemed absolutely perfect at each level of the habitat I had entered into until I had managed to regain my self.

Finally, I got to the ground level – the base of this whole habitat. I still did not know who had created it or how it was run – I just threw off the shackles of the various levels and was just discovering what this ‘ground level’ was all about. It seemed that the only people who had made it to this level had been the ones who circumvented or resisted successfully their ‘governor chip’.

Backing up a bit: to get from the high (most controlled) levels to the lower ones, there was always a door. Yes, I get it, a door. Heavily guarded at the top most levels, less guarded as you made your way to the lower levels. This should have rang an alarm bell, but, in my dream, it seemed perfect.

So, I work my way to the lowest level – and there is a door.

Yes, a door.

And it says that if I walk through that door, I will become GOD.

Oh, the temptation!

But, my sleeping, dreaming self did not choose to just go through that door and become GOD.

Why?

Well, did it mean I would gain control over this colony/habitat?

Would I now be in charge of controlling the ‘governors’ that control the thoughts of people in the different levels of the habitat?

Would I want that?

Or, would ‘becoming GOD’ mean I would have not just over the habitat/colony, but also over the ones who had created it?

In my dream, I was flummoxed: what exactly would ‘becoming GOD’ mean? And through it various permutations, would I want that? I walked away to ponder the implications…

Luckily, my alarm went off and I never had to answer that question in my dream.

Yet, it has haunted me since: what would it, really, mean to be GOD.

Happy ‘Draw Mohammed Day’!

From 2 years ago today:

 

A Most Excellent Post – Censored from reddit

Yes, this site has been dormant for way too long.

This is because I have been very busy with working to achieve the goals promoted by this site from its inception through alternate means.  And, I have been doing some serious ‘growing up’ in the process.  But more on that later…

Today, I came across a post on reddit that I found most illuminating.  However, between when I first clicked on it and the time I was ready to comment on it, it had been censored.

Deleted.

Disappeared.

Gone down the ‘memory hole’…

Whatever the metaphor, it was made gone – as if the book-burners had had their way with it.

And so, my friends, with the permission of the author (a redditor by the name of ‘istillgetreallybored’), I bring you the banished, censored and book-burned post:

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE (this reee is dedicated in part to the cucked pedes who think they are alpha just because they voted for Trump)

They have to go back. Trump has reduced ISIS from 35k to 1k and the migrant crisis was a fraud to instigate a replacement program to further economic marxism as a means to controlling humans. We should have been helping (not causing the crisis would have been best) them in their country of origin which would have resulted in 100 fold cost savings and prevented this assimilation issue.

Islam does not recognize borders. Wake up.

For those who don’t have freeee speech.

The heart-war —- and that is the lowest form of the war. And it is that the Muslim should believe in his heart that the infidels are enemies to him and to his religion, and that he should desire their disappearance and the destruction of their power. And no Muslim can be imagined who is not under obligation to this degree of the war. Verily all the people of the Faith are under obligation to this amount without any question whatever, in whatever place they may be and in whatsoever condition they may be found. And that those concerning whom the exception made in the verse presented in the saying of the Most High holds good (You should abstain from them completely) to these it is permitted that they should be satisfied with this degree of the heart-war.3

Discussion with Dr Bill Warner on NYC jihad attack

Former CIA Station Chief, Brad Johnson interview, June 20 2017

Dr. Jordan Peterson’s lecture in Ottawa, 11th of March, 2017 – with intro by Mrs. Tammy Peterson

Act! For Canada’s Ottawa chapter brought the iconic Dr. Jordan Peterson to speak at the main branch of the Ottawa Library.

And, luckily, we got Mrs. Tammy Peterson (a powerful intellect and personality in her own right) to give us a glimpse into how their lives have been altered since Dr. Peterson’s pro-free-speech rant went viral in 2016:

 

 

Q&A videos to come as they are published.

For the record:  Dr. Peterson WILL go down in the history books as THE Socrates/Aristotle/St. Thomas of Aquinas/Jan Hus/Gogol/Jung/Nietzsche+++ of our era – all rolled into one.

Just saying…

…but history will prove me right.

He will have turned out to be THE most influential thinker of our era.  That much I am certain about.