Flag-burning: OK, let’s!

Burning a flag is a very clear way of sending a message: fuck you and the horse you rode in on!

Or, for the more dainty among us:  we reject you and what you represent.

OK, fair enough.

Except the hose bit – cruelty to animals is never OK.

The sentiment, however, is validly expressed by the burning of the flag that represents the despised ‘rider’.

Sure, it is not a pleasant sight to see the symbol of one’s culture (and, by extension, values) so unambiguously rejected.  But, that is rather the point, isn’t it!

As is burning someone in effigy:  it is an unambiguous rejection of who they are and what they stand for.

As a political statement, flag-burning is not only a valid form of expression, it is one that must be protected at all costs, whether it is directed at us, our allies or our enemies.  Regardless of whoose jimmies it rustles!

What is not valid is violence against actual people and property damage (unless, of course, it is your property you are damaging – then that is your business entirely)!

For clarity’s sake – raping and murdering a country’s ambassador falls into the ‘not OK’ category…it being an act of war and all.  As is raiding a foreign embassy, ripping down their flag and putting yours in its place.  After all, every embassy is legally the soil of the country of that embassy, so using violent means to enter the embassy grounds and replacing its country’s flag with your own quite literally means the conquering of a part of that country’s sovereign territory and annexing it to your political entity, as symbolized by your flag.

In other words, storming an embassy and replacing its flag with your own is also an unequivocal declaration of war.

Pretending otherwise is past naive.  It is criminally negligent or actively complicit or a host of other unpleasant things, but it is past even wilfully naive.

Luckily, you and I are not the people who have to make the call about what is an appropriate response to an act of war – against your country (if you are an American) or that of your allies (if you are part of the Western World) – we are just the people who will have to live with the aftermath of whatever decisions those in power will make.

And, this is certain:  whether you are an American, a Westerner or live in another part of the world – whatever the response (or lack thereof) is, you and I will have to live through the consequences.

A war has been declared.

Whether or not those in power send it the troops (literally or figuratively), it is happening…

What is within our power, however, is to let our leaders know what our opinions are.

In order to do that, in order for the mesage to cut through the clatter and chatter, in order for it not to be misunderstood or misinterpreted, the message has to be clear, visible and unequivocal.

I suggest that at all the anti-Islamism protests planned in the Western world, we include the burning of the Islamist flag.

Remember, this flag does not represent Islam in general:  it represents exclusively political Islam.

And, as it was the flag raised over the US Embassy in Egypt, it is fair comment to burn it here, during our protests, in order to send the clear and unambiguous message that we rejcect it and what it represents.

After all, flag-burning is a message that is understood by all.

It’s about time we started sending it!

John Robson on the murder of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens

September 11th is a day for mourning…

…no matter how much the political elites and the inteligentsia want to twist the message…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cnErUU-pfE&feature=colike

David Harris on the Iran situation

Canada expels Iranian diplomats, closes embassy in Iran

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-1YEzzPA-w&feature=colike

 

It seems that those predicting that violence will come from the Iranian regime while the Americans are bogged down in an election campaign may be more correct than any of us wish.

This is a sign of bad things happening…

A few hours of lectures by Stephen Coughlin on our ineptitude on ‘the war on terror’

Yes, this lecture series is a little long – but very, very informative.

If you have read the Koran and the Hadith, and if you are familiar with Shariah, you  will be impressed by the depth of Stephen Coughlin’s background knowledge – but there is still a lot of new material there for you because he draws the connections between the beliefs rooted (rightly or wrongly, but demonstrably held by the majority of pro-Sharia Muslims worldwide) in these and the decision-making and behaviour of Islamic political entities.

For example, he is one of the few people to have predicted the ‘Arab Spring’ months before it happened and accurately described it as a Muslim Brotherhood-driven action.  He also accurately predicted other events many had considered ‘unpredictible’ – and in this lecture series, he walks us through the steps that made the events predictable.

If you are unfamiliar with the underlying doctrine, Stephen Coughlin provides an accurate grounding in their belief system and demonstrates its doctrinal roots.  He also explains the very  different concepts meant by Islamic political bodies when they use terms we consider familiar:  words like ‘human rights’ (Sharia), ‘terrorism’ (killing of a Muslim without Sharia approval), and ‘freedom’ (freedom from ‘the laws of man’ in favour of the laws from Allah alone), ‘religion’ (Islam and Islam alone as Muhammad’s revelations abrogated all other religions) and more.

What is quite appalling, however, is his description of the depth of willful ignorance of all this by the politically correct decisionmakers who are directing the ‘war on terror’…  His frustration is plainly visible and his Cassandra complex and the accompanying frustration are, at times, palpable.

Yet, it is precisely this willful ignorance among our decisionmakers and intellectual elites poses a clear and present danger to protecting our culture, our society and our very basic human rights.

Stephen Coughlin, Part 1: Lectures on National Security & Counterterror Analysis (Introduction)

Stephen Coughlin, Part 2: Understanding the War on Terror Through Islamic Law

Stephen Coughlin, Part 3: Abrogation & the ‘Milestones’ Process

Stephen Coughlin, Part 4: Muslim Brotherhood, Arab Spring & the ‘Milestones’ Process

Stephen Coughlin, Part 5: The Role of the OIC in Enforcing Islamic Law

Just a reminder…

…of the resolve we used to have….

…when we had no trouble in identifying who our enemy was…

Genocide in Sudan: Call for Action, Cry for Change

What is happening is Sudan is horrible.

But, what can we do?

Aid workers there get kidnapped – because the method the Sudanese government uses to kill people is to drive them into refugee camps and then deny aid workers access:  people simply starve.  It’s beyond inhuman…

And the slave-trade there is being revived…

 

Claire Lopez: Next Steps on Iran

 

Kevin Freeman: Economic Terrorism Against America

I don’t quite know what to think about this longish video…

Ideas?