AronRa: ‘Faith is not a virtue’

This video is interesting for several different reasons.

Yes, I do agree with most of what AronRa says in this one.

The only exception I take is to his claim that circumcision gives some protection against the transmission of AIDS.  Yes, there are studies that ‘conclusively’ show this.  But, there are just as many studies that just as ‘conclusively’ show that this is not so.  All studies, however, show that wearing a condom does work…

…and I think that it is better to err on the side of caution when it comes to incurable deadly diseases.  Still, if people wish the protection of circumcision as well as a condom, when they are old enough to give informed consent to it and they pay themselves for it, I have no problem with any cosmetic procedure.

After all, self-ownership is the cornerstone of our civilization!

The reason this video is important is not just because of the reasonable things AronRa says (and that he looks rather good saying them), and not because of how he says them (he is a much better speaker when he does not deliver a prepared speech but rather when he speaks unscripted), but because of the attitude the theists in the audience display as well as the demonstration of theist sentiment in the video that AronRa shows.

It is difficult to describe just how visceral the hatred many theists feel toward atheists – and feel completely righteous in expressing – is.

Don’t get me wrong – I don’t want to shut them up.

Let them spew.

But really – saying that if my beliefs don’t match theirs, I should be raped?

Suggesting all atheists should be hunted down and killed?

We are not talking about some uneducated Islamists – these sentiments were expressed by American Christians…

OK.

An orthodox Jew, a moderate Muslim and an archetypal polytheists (someone who believes all gods exist – as fairy-tales) walk into a bar.

What happens next?

The Jew and the Muslim unite against the atheist in a ‘theological’ debate.

This is not a joke – it happened to me.  The moderate Muslim was Salim Mansur.  We were all celebrating the launch of Salim’s most excellent book, ‘The Delectable Lie’.

Sure, everything was very friendly and good humoured – but, it still did not take long for the two monotheists to set their differences aside and unite against the atheist.  (To be perfectly honest, I am nowhere near as good at verbal arguing as either one of these two intelligent, educated men…  Mind you, since then, I have thought of really, really awesome things I should have said!  AHA!)

OK, these guys had their fun, but they were very, very nice to me.

They were not like the typical theists one meets.

Somehow, I suspect I have had more than my ‘fair’ share of ‘scary’ experiences.

I have ‘bunny-hopped’ a tank once – because my Aspieness got me manipulated into trying to drive one when I was 12-years-old.  Really, I just mouthed-off to the ‘wrong’ ‘many’-star general (because I did not ‘get’ it) it a totalitarian country – all my friends later admitted they thought I was going to be either sent to re-education camp or expelled from the exclusive language school as a result.

I have been stopped in the street and interrogated by the police – in a totalitarian police state – for not having my ‘documents’ …when I was too young to have been issued ‘documents’.

I have escaped from a totalitarian police state across a closed border.

I was less than 15 meters from a live shoot-out battle between two criminal elements within the UN refugee camp where I was staying.  There were fatalities.

I was stalked – twice, by very different men in very different circumstances.

I was physically attacked by attempted rapists, three times (twice by someone whom I knew, once by a group of strangers).  I had to fight my way out, each time.  (Twice I did so unharmed, once I got off easily with just a torn-up shoulder – it still pops out of its socket at the slightest provocation!  Well worth it!)

But, never in my life have I felt as unsafe, as physically threatened, as when a neighbour manipulated me to go to her Pentecostal Church and the ‘congregation’ saw me – singled out – refuse to ‘accept Jesus into my heart’!!!

Truly, this was the most frightening thing I have ever experienced.

At the risk of sounding pretentious, I suspect I understand how Hypatia felt in the last moments of her life.  (This NOT, in any way, a comparison of me to Hypatia:  it is the comparison of the fear we both felt as we faced a crowd of homicidal theists on her part and almost-homicidal ones on my part!)

I kid you not.

I could face a bullet.

I could beat up a bunch of thugs.

I could face down stalkers.

I can defend my honour against attempted rapists.

But faced with such a large crowd, whipped into a mob mentality by their preacher, so sure in their ‘righteousness’ and so pitiless towards ‘unbelievers’ – I knew that if something tipped them just a tiny bit further, I was dead.

It was palpable!

It was then that I knew what being hated not for ‘who I was’, but for ‘what I was’ was like.

So, yes – I do believe the theists – Christian, Muslim or whatever other religion – when they say that they will kill me, if they get a chance.

Not every theist is this way, of course not.

But way too many are.

The religion itself is much less important than the sense of self-righteousness it conveys onto its adherents!

It is my profound conviction that without the religious teaching that it is righteous and God-pleasing to exterminate ‘the unbelievers’, these men and women would never have abandoned morality in favour of threatened or actual mob violence – and felt good about doing it!!!

And this is demonstrated in this video:

 

 

Freedom From Religion Foundation sues South Carolina School District

When I was in high school, we started every morning by the playing of ‘Oh Canada’, our national anthem.

Being a recent immigrant, I found this daily exercise of overt of tribalism to be weird in the extreme and did not, at first, understand why it would come about at all…

Over time, I began to understand the impulse that drove the playing of the national anthem 1st thing every morning:  it ‘clicked’ for me a bit after we got a new principal.

Our old principal would ask us to ‘stand for ‘Oh Canada’ and a few moments of silent prayer or meditation’.  When our new principal took over, the ritual was retained in exactly the same form, except that the ‘or meditation’ was dropped.

Now, I was being told to stand for the national anthem and prayer!!!

Of course, I complained:  not about the anthem, but about the dropping of ‘or meditation’.  I complained to several teachers; each one of them told me that it’s OK for me not to pray, because since it is a ‘silent prayer’, nobody will know that I am not praying.  I tried to be calm as I explained that that was hardly the point – and that behaving immoraly because I can get away with it is not a good lesson for them to be teaching me anyway.  The point was that by removing the ‘or meditation’ bit, they were denying the very existence of non-theists and that that was rather insulting and probably illegal.

It was then that it ‘clicked’ for me why it was that the morning was started with the national anthem:  the theists who ran the system could not imagine starting their day without a ritualistic appeal to authority.  Since they could not openly pray out loud in the secular school, they replaced the ritualistic appeal to a divine authority by an equally ritualistic appeal to the secular authority…

In other words, the playing of ‘Oh Canada’ was not really an expression of patriotism but rather a substitute for ritualistic prayer…

Which is a very round-about way to introduce the following story:

‘The Freedom From Religion Foundation and one of its South Carolina members filed a lawsuit today in U.S. District Court in Columbia, S.C., against School District Five of Lexington and Richland Counties over a district policy that sanctions graduation prayer. Plaintiff Matthew Nielson graduated with his Irmo High School classmates today.

Nielson, 18, and state-church watchdog FFRF allege the district’s written policy violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs, represented by South Carolina counsel Aaron Kozloski, ask the court to declare the district’s policy null and void.

Despite the decades, religionists are still imposing their fetishes onto kids!

In related news:

 

Pat Condell: Can I Say This?

Modern Day Christian Witch Hunts

Like many of the people in the modern anti-religion (anti-ALL-religions), I have, on occasion, been accused by modern-day Christians of unfairly lumping their religion in with all the other unreasonable dogmas which are so destructive to society, yet whose malignancy is tolerated under the guise of ‘religion’.

Sure, they agree, Islam is guilty of persecuting, jailing and executing people on the vacuous charge of ‘witchcraft’.  That is obviously wrong and evil and ignorant.  (Or, so the narrative goes…)   Christianity is better than other religions because we have shed the shackles of ignorance and, for centuries, indulge in these sort of unenlightened practices and have not for centuries…

Show me – they dare – an inquisitor or a witch hunter today!

Well, OK – let’s do that!

Christians today – and not just in developing countries, but in the UK and the US – are active in hunting down and torture-killing witches.  The new twist to the narrative is that these modern-day ‘witches’ are children.

Yes, children!!!

Here is a bit about a 15-year-old boy who was murdered (and his younger siblings tortured) by relatives in the UK because they suspected the children of witchcraft.  The trial of the family members has concluded with a guilty verdict earlier this year – that is 2012!!!

And, the US is not immune…

Recent surveys show that some 20+% of the adults in the USA believe in ‘witches’ – of the malignant, fairy-tale type, not of the neo-Pagan religious practitioners type…

So much for Christianity having come out of the dark ages!!!

Here are some supporting links:

Helen Ukpabio – Wikipedia

Liberty Foundation Gospel Ministries

Interview:  Witches, Mermaids and Exorcisms With Pastor Godwin Umotong On SaharaTV

NY Times:  On a Visit to the U.S., a Nigerian Witch-Hunter Explains Herself

Facebook:  Stand Against Helen Ukpabio

The short of it is:  unreasonable belief leads to unreasonable actions.  Adults must be free to do stupid things, but children must be protected from their parents’ religious beliefs.

We accept that a parent, while responsible for a child, does not have the freedom to abuse them sexually.  It is high time we extended this protection of children to include protection from religious abuse, because it is no less destructive than sexual abuse!

 

And while I am at it…

Most of us consider Judaism to be another one of the ‘civilized’ religions – one which has produced some of the most enlightened minds in the field of science and which is not ‘oppressive’ on its practitioners the way some other religions are…

Yet, there is Judaism and there is Judaism…

Many Jews are well integrated into their host societies and for them, being ‘Jewish’ is more of a national identity than it is a religious faith.  Many do practice some of the customs which identify them as ‘Jews’ as a form of private observance and, as long as they do not impose it on their children before they are old enough to give informed consent (and, yes, I am referring specifically to the intolerable practice of arbitrary amputation of part of a penis in infants, which ought to be illegal), I have no argument with it.

However, there are other forms of Judaism alive and well in our society – ones which I consider much less benign.

When a group of people refuses to integrate and takes great pains to segregate itself from the society in which they live, bad things happen.

Always.

When religion is the ‘carrot and the whip’ to enforce such a segregation, we ought not tolerate this:  it is one thing for adults to exercise their freedom of religion, it is quite another one for them to strip it away from their children.

Because we have learned that over and over and over again , and as one of my role-models, Asma Jahangir, has taught us – when a religious minority demands special rights, they will always use these ‘rights’ to oppress minorities within themselves, most commonly children and women.

As is the case in this story of a self-segregated Orthodox Jewish community, their ‘internal courts’ and child abuse…

Aside:  when we fought – and succeeded – against the opening of Sharia courts in Ontario, we also fought against separate ‘Jewish tribunals’ – in effect, the Jewish versions of Sharia courts.  I am pleased to say that, unlike in the linked article, Ontario is free of this malignancy:  a society cannot exist unless there is one set of laws for everyone, equally applied to everyone by both the police and the courts!!!

To sum up:  one law – and one and equal law enforcement –  for all members of society is necessary in order to maintain society.  Children have innate rights which even their parents must not be permitted to violate – and permitting parents to violate their children’s right to religious freedom (through childhood indoctrination) is deeply connected to and, in reality, little different from permitting parents to commit or facilitate child sexual abuse.  It is about time we started treating the two crimes alike!

 

 

Victimless Criminal: Religious People Are Less Compassionate

Thunderf00t: Lying for Jesus!

 

VictimlessCriminal: Analytical Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief

More of VictimlessCriminal’s ‘Religion Is The Great Hiacker’

VictimlessCriminal: Religion is The Great Hijacker

Yes!

One of my favourite YouTubers has re-surfaced, with a whole crop of most excellent videos!

VictimlessCriminal has brought us videos that warn of how the Lisbon Treaty lists pedophilia as a grounds on which a person may not be discriminated against,  Islam’s attitude towards women and now, he has turned to looking at religions in general.

I cannot immediately find his videos from a few years ago, but he does have a latest series out, entitled ‘Religion is The Great Hijacker‘.  His goal is not to argue agains belief in divine beings or indeed in trying to draw a distinction between theists and atheists.  He states that, having been on both sides of that division, he regards it as more artificial than we would all like to think…

Rather, what he wants to do is to shine a light at what part of the human experience had been hijacked by religions and used to enforce its dogma, in order that we can take ownership of what is rightly ours.

Part 1:  Introduction

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lT-YGJI-CtY&feature=colike

Part 2: Bankruptcy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_H7Vo6FP9I&feature=colike

Part 3:  Morality

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2af-sjfDH0&feature=colike

Part 4:  Sin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Naf_k-toyEk&feature=colike

Part 5:  Confession

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZWmltJhGPs&feature=colike

Part 6:  The Soul

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5cc3sOM9GM&feature=colike

Part 7:  Comfort

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2ZhdxOXOEU&feature=colike

Part 8:  Justice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eG21JEdXQQ&feature=colike

Part 9:  Miracles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr_7m7dHWus&feature=colike

Part 10:  Charity

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmfxNdya2yo&feature=colike

Thunderf00t’s Conversation with Eric Hovind

This is a long and painful conversation during which Thunderf00t attempts to explain the philosophical concept that made Socrates famous:  I know that I know nothing!

Thunderf00t then goes to present his 3 basal accumptions on which he has built his model of reality – and attempts to explain this to Mr. Hovind.

Eric Hovind fails to understand the concept altogether – and gets stuck on it.