Hera: the Ultimate Hercules Derangement Syndrome (Part 5)

So far, I hope to have established that Ancient Greeks tried a path to integrate the peoples they had conquered by matching their head god with Zeus, the Ancient Greek’s head god, which worked rather well for the larger integration, but created the problem of all the ‘goddess queens’ that were now left over…

These became, in the mythology, human women Zeus had affairs with.

The conquered men had only to blame their head god (who became fused with Zeus) for being capricious, but, whom did the conquered women have?

One of their own – a human woman from their tribe – was so awesome as to cause Zeus, the to dog god, to fall in love with her, carry her off, do all kinds of dangerous things for the love of this woman – one of their own.

In comes Hera.

She is the Goddess of ‘family’ – yet she is always being cheated on by her husband, Zeus. And with human women – to add insult to the injury!

Hera is the Goddess of protecting the nuclear family – and she cannot do it with her own family!

This rather turns Hera nasty: she cannot control her husband, the king of Gods, from cheating on her, but she still is a goddess and has the powers that come along with it. Hera, not able to punish her husband, takes her anger out on his human lovers and their children.

And she does it in very, very mean ways. There are books written just about the ways Hera punished the women Zeus romanced (whether they were willing or not).

But…let us remember: Hera threw away her son (Hephaestus/Vulcan) to what she thought would be his death simply because he was born deformed. She may be the goddess of the hearth, family and childbirth, but she did throw away her baby for having been born deformed.

So, how did she treat the children of her husband, Zeus, and human women?

Not nicely.

When there arose a particularly awesome specimen of humanity, the son of Zeus and a human woman, Hera was not happy. Like, a lot ‘not happy’.

And, she made Hercules suffer, every chance she got.

There was nothing anyone could say to her to convince her that Hercules was actually a good guy, who did good things to help people.

Yes, he had been given a bunch of tasks to do, and he did them well and cleverly, but, outside of that, he is said to have helped folks who needed help, lending his muscle power as well as his intelligence, where and when needed.

Perhaps we can argue about his worth – but, the one not willing to engage in such an argument was Hera.

For her, Hercules was a symbol of her husband’s infidelity. He had to be destroyed.

The more famous Hercules got, the more necessary it was for Hera to absolutely destroy him.

And she did – in the most devious way possible.

Hercules had a wife and two children. He loved them and protected them.

Hera knew this.

And, she had her goddess powers.

She used these powers.

When Hercules came home one day, he saw a big monster and two little monsters attacking his home – and, loving his family, he slew them to protect his wife and children.

Except that, these were not monsters, they were his wife and children. Hera’s magic made him see them as monsters. So, he slew them.

Hera’s magic made Hercules kill his own family. His wife and children…

It destroyed Hercules.

This is a sad end to an epic story – but it is really important in our times.

Hera suffered from ‘Hercules derangement syndrome’ because she had been wronged. Her role as the protector goddess of the family was challenged by her husband’s infidelity and his bastard child’s excellence.

There was no way to talk Hera down from her vengeance.

Her very being as the queen of the gods, as the patroness of the family, was completely uprooted by the very existence of Hercules. Her very essence, her reason for being, is undermined by the very existence of Hercules.

These are high stakes, for a goddess, a top goddess.

Somehow, I do not think that chatting with her about the good things Hercules did would change her mind. Rather, I think the person doing the chatting would end up in a bit of smoke…

Trump is not a Democrat or Republican, he is a Mercantilist.

Prove me wrong.

Please, prove me wrong.

There is a lot to unpack with President Donald Trump. Some of it is good and some of it is bad. No, I am not fence-sitting, I am being realistic.

Mercantilism is a better economic model than what Biden’s administration put forth, but, it is seriously inferior to Austrian Economics – even opposed to them at times.

Heck, there is even a really good conspiracy theory (that will never be proven or disproven, because the surrounding data had been systematically destroyed for political reasons, which may or may not have anything to do with theories of economy) that the Austro-Hungarian Prince had been assassinated (leading to Franz Josef being the successor to the crown) precisely because he was a proponent of the Austrian model of economics (think Von Mises) and was planning to put these principles into play upon his rising to the throne.

Yeah, a while ago.

But, this is a valid direction to ruminate in, as Mercantilism was most alive just before then, and was being uprooted by ‘the Austrian School of economics’.

Rooting out inefficiencies and underhanded ways that taxpayer money has been handed over to partisan actors – that is a good thing.

But, the mercantilist mindset is a bitter pill to swallow – if you want to support President Trump.

The most (sadly) interesting thing – from a disinterested 5,000m perspective – is that President Trump’s political opponents are not attacking him on the things that they should: they are being petty and short-sighted, without laying out a reasoned opposition to his mercantilism. It is as if they are working from ignorance, not knowledge.

And that is sad, very sad.

A Musical Interlude – Part 1

Yes, it is true – I dislike most music.

Playing music just to drown out the silence, the thinking time – that is how our culture has gone.

But, there are a few songs I do enjoy – and yes, they are political in their nature or I would not find any merit in them. Music is awesome, because it is a most potent vehicle of brain-washing. It is silly not to acknowledge that each and every song is a tool of brainwashing.

We can drill down to folk songs back when they were sung by peasants to make their plight tolerable…yeah, I am a descendant of these peasants and fully understand their songs, for what they are…

Winston Marshall hosts James Lindsay on his show: long, but very interesting listen

Dr. James Lindsay is a Mathematician who, along with friends Helen Pluckrose and Dr. Peter Boghossian noticed that there was a marked lack of rigour and scientific method in highly regarded, peer-reviewed papers published on a particular part of the Social Sciences, derogatorily referred to a Grievance Studies. To see if they were correct, they wrote a number of bogus papers with very poor scientific methods and a lot of popular buzzwords and claims of the Grievance Studies.

Surprise surprise, their papers (like how dog-owners react to male-on-female humping vs male-on-male humping in dog parks and how these reactions ‘prove’ inherent sexism in our culture) began to be published and acclaimed. I actually remember some of these papers being papers being touted in mainstream media (MSM) and rolling my eyes – and it is a sad commentary that so many people accepted them as ‘science’ because they were ‘peer-reviewed’…because none of us quite realized that the ‘peers’ doing the ‘reviewing’ were not scientists but ideologues.

When what they thought were transparently fake and somewhat satirical papers began to be cited and nominated for scientific excellence awards, the trio pulled the plug on the project and revealed what they had done.

Perhaps some of my details of the story are fuzzy by the flow of time, but the major point remains.

Since then Dr. Lindsay has taken a deep dive into the world of Grievance Studies and what were the underlying principles that let to them and their open disdain in rejecting the scientific method and instead treating purely political screeds as ‘science’. He has gone to many primary sources and slugged through them, as well as some excellent analyst like Maj. Stephen Coughlin of Unconstrained Analytics. Here is one of Stephen Coughlin’s ‘briefs’:

Winston Marshall prides himself on being a banjo player in some band, but had to quit because he liked a book written by a journalist who was seriously injured by Antifa. Now, he has a wildly successful program here he interviews the greatest thinkers of our times and helps unlock the complexity of their arguments to those of us just learning about the topic can follow with ease – but they are complex topics.

For example, in the video below, James Lindsay and Winston Marshall delve into what is wokism (best explanation so far is that it is Critical Constructionist Epistemology, where the ‘way of knowing’ is constructed on the foundation of the Critical Theory as evolved from the original Frankfurt School teachings – yes, big words – but they really explain them) and the difference between the ‘woke right’ and the ‘woke left’ as well as the different flavours of conservatism and leftism/progressivism in our current political milieu and how the second coming of Donald Trump to the Presidency disrupts how the various groups are evolving.

It is only an hour-and-a-bit long, but is is distilled information that is made comprehensible and Winston Marshall asks all the questions I would have asked for clarification when the wording got too technical.

Warning: James Lindsay – in any of his videos/podcasts/interviews will stretch your mind. But, Winston Marshall is such a skilled interviewer, he makes it enjoyable.

So, please, do enjoy this video:

Things almost came to ‘fistycuffs’ at a local coffee shop

Perhaps the most ubiquitous coffee chain in Canada is Tim Hortons. It used to be good, got bought our and their fare cheeped out, but it is still a fun neutral place for us Canucks to go grab a coffee or a quick lunch with friends.

Today was such a day.

We are a family politically divided by generations and the friends we were having lunch with are a wonderful couple that is more politically aligned with our son, and have a particular hate on for President Trump and Elon Musk.

To their credit, unlike many people in that camp, they do not look down on us – rather, they engage us in a political discussion in a very amicable way, just as it should be. Just because we do not agree politically does not mean we cannot be friends – something rather lacking in many places today, so I am very grateful for that.

We were having our lunch, sitting at a table with our backs to the ordering line. And, we strode into the Elon Musk DOGE area of discussion where our friends and our son agreed, but my hubby and I defended the idea of rooting out corruption in the Administrative State.

I was even bringing in examples of the Canadian Administrative State overreach that I had witnessed first hand in one of my previous careers (I hopped around a lot – based on my needs at the time…I would start little to spend time with the kids and get suckered in deep, so I’d leave and start little again, get suckered in deep – I have boundary issues and a bit of an alpha thing going).

Re-focusing: we were talking about Musk and DOGE and what they were doing and one of our friends was expressing serious doubts about trusting Elon Musk with, well, anything.

A customer in the ordering line – just behind us – leaned in and laid in to the conversation, saying we need Musk and DOGE here in Canada because our taxpayer money was being used badly and in the wrong places. He got a bit of a push back from our friend, but, to be honest, our friend seemed rather taken aback that a complete stranger at a coffee shop would interject himself into our conversation.

And, our conversation was very civil and with no raised voices – which could not be said for, shall we call him Customer 1, C1 for ease of typing. My hubby and I were giving him silent thumbs up, but, none of us were ready for what happened next.

Another person, let’s call him Customer 2, C2. Well, C2 clearly overheard C1’s comments and took very, very loud issue with them. Including calling C1 and ‘idiot’ and a lot of rude words, to which C1 suggested to C2 that he go ‘f’ himself.

By this point, the whole coffee shop was riveted by their exchange and it looked like things might turn to fistycuffs!

Except that they were both holding Timmy’s coffee, which complicated the potential carnage. Don’t want to spill Timmy’s coffee!

In the end, there was no actual violence and though I may make light of it, it is because the potential for violence was there and very palpable.

This is in Canada.

Not the USA that is dealing with this breakdown in civility first hand.

Makes one wonder how it will all end…

Free Tommy Robinson rally, Ottawa, 9th of June, 2018 part 1

Sorry, not sure if embedding will work, but, please, follow the link.

This is my intro to the rally:

 

More coverage of Tommy Robinson Rally in Ottawa, 1st of June 2018

I Am Tommy Robinson Rally – June 01, 2018, Ottawa

Happy ‘Draw Mohammed Day’!

From 2 years ago today:

 

Please, DO REMEMBER this stark Obama ‘Annivesary’

Please, DO ask yourself – and all your loved ones – what could possibly have motivated something like this: