5 Minute Speech that Got Judge Napolitano Fired from Fox News

Open Letter to Ruby Foo’s regarding the cancellation of Paul Weston’s appearance

Open letter to:
Ruby Foo’s
7655 Décarie Boul,
Montréal, QC
H4P 2H2
Attention:  Kathy  Myrosznyczenko, Banquet manager
CC:           Christine Enos, Director of Sales and Marketing

Hello Ms. Myrosznyczenko!

Ruby Foo’s is a Montreal icon and I have thoroughly enjoyed attending many interesting and information rich events there.  Thank you.
It therefore saddened me greatly when your establishment had, at the last moment, cancelled a recent appearance by Paul Weston.  Several carloads of us had organized the trip down to Montreal to hear this important and influential politician speak, so the very late date of cancellation had caused us to be unable to recover the often unrecoverable costs associated with the trip (like calling in favours to cover our work shifts, and so on).
However, aside from any personal aggravation or cost to the members of our group, your actions in cancelling Paul Weston’s presentation will have important and far-reaching implications:  by denying his message from being spread far and wide, by giving in to the terrorist’s veto, you have directly undermined the rule of law in our society.
And Paul Weston is an immensely important politician:  he is the Winston Churchill of our generation.  Please, look up the slanderous things his opponents had called Winston Churchill when he was speaking truth and reason to people who did not want to hear it… they are much the same as what Paul Weston’s opponents call him today.
As any history buff can tell you, had Winston Churchill’s words been listened to early enough, WWII – and the associated deaths and suffering – might have been avoided, or, at least, greatly minimized.
Currently, Europe is on the brink of civil war and Paul Weston is one of the very few politicians who are standing up and trying to convince European governments to enact policies which would restore law and order in Europe and which will hopefully prevent war, which has the potential to engulf the whole of the world and escalate into WWIII.
By preventing his message from reaching us and us learning from it, thank you, Ruby Foo’s – you may now proudly stand up and count yourself, as an institution, and every single one of your employees who had not stood up and prevented this cancellation from being done as individuals – you may now proudly stand up and count yourselves as collaborators with the forces that may indeed bring about WWIII!
This may sound like a hyperbole to you now – and I sincerely hope that I am wrong.  But, if the conflict in Europe descends into violence – and current indicators suggest that we are talking about ‘when’ rather than ‘if’ – then please, do understand that some of that blood is on your hands.
Sincerely,
Alexandra Belaire
P.S.  This is an open letter and will be published internationally, along with any response you wish to make to it.

Stephen Coughlin CVE interview part II

Dutch man arrested for wearing a ‘pig’ hat

Stephen Coughlin CVE interview part II

Thunderf00t: Feminists deplatform Richard Dawkins from science conference

It seems Thunderf00t seems to have a hard time wrapping his brain about this latest CM wrinkle:

Sargon of Akkad’s reaction to Richard Dawkins being No-Platformed by Atheism+

 

 

Sargon’s parsing of the incident is very similar to that on the Vlad Tepes blog:

Let’s parse this a little:

“We believe strongly in freedom of speech and freedom to express unpopular and even offensive views.” But in the very next line they qualify that statement to negate pretty much anything anyone at any time and under any circumstances finds offensive for any reason. The language of cultural-Marxism ensues:

“Divisive, counter-productive (but no standard given for what constitutes productive and certainly no exception was made in the previous statement that all speech must be ‘productive’ on this unnamed standard) and hateful, meaning the organizers hated it so it doesn’t count under the former statement of: “We believe strongly in freedom of speech and freedom to express unpopular and even offensive views.”

This is some of the most blatant Cultural Marxist/Orwellian hypocrisy I have seen from a scientific body of sufficient gravitas that a person like Richard Dawkins would consider speaking to.

Yes.

Indeed.

And let’s not forget what Atheism+ had done to Thundref00t when he attempted to apply logic and skepticism to their Third Wave Feminist dogma.

It was such an eye-opening experience for Thunderf00t that he took time from creating “Why do people laugh at creationists” video series to make  “Feminism Versus FACTS” video series.  Here, he applies, ahm, logic and the scientific method to examining what feminists actually say and write and, it sounds surprisingly like the ravings of intolerant religious dogma.

Aside – he documented the process, as it was happening, in the series “Why ‘Feminism’ is poisoning Atheism”.

Which is exactly the parallel so humorously drawn in the video on which Richard Dawkins had commented – and which made him public enemy #1 (well, for now) of the A+ and their ilk folks out there.

 

P.S. – I remember posting the lunatic, crude and rude rantings of the feminist caricatured in this video when she first started shrilly calling people out on the street ‘fuckface’ when they disagreed with her.  Ah, yes, the good old days…

To sum this all up:  I am glad that the SJW’s are finally being called out for the vicious, intolerant, totalitarian, Cultural Marxist pity-whores they are.

Jodie Ginsberg of Index on Censorship on the Global State of Censorship

Bill Warner, PhD: The Many Jihads

Proof that Western security forces are ‘racist’

OK – this is a bit of a departure for me:  I am going to use ‘progressive’ reasoning and statistics to prove, beyond any doubt, that our Western security forces are ‘racist’ and furthermore, that they are indulging in ‘racial profiling’.

Aside:  all terms used in this reasoning are done so in accordance with how they are used by ‘progressives’, without any regard to actual reality.  This is done to help the argument sound more realistic (as in, as if it were uttered by a ‘progressive’ and not implying in any way that it would be grounded in actual real life stuff).

Here we go:

After extensive (and expensive – we have a government grant for this) study of the crime statistics, we have uncovered the shocking fact that 100% of those arrested and tried for aiding and abetting DAESH (which has nothing to do with Islam, the religion of peace) are Muslims.

This is in stark contrast to the demographics that show that Muslims make up only 0.9% of the population of the USA, 3.2% in Canada, 5% in the UK, 10% in France, 5% (well, perhaps 10% by now) in Germany, and so on.

Clearly, there is a glaring difference between the relatively small % of the population in The West which is Muslim, and the 100% of Muslims being arrested for acts in support of the terrorist organization known as DAESH (which has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam, the religion of peace).

We therefore recommend that Western security apparatus employees be sent on sufficient sensitivity and cultural awareness training, perhaps lead by members of the oppressed group, until the % of Muslims arrested for actively supporting DAESH is more proportional to their demographic representation within the host country.  

Anything short of this is systemic racism and must be avoided at all costs.

QED

Did you like this glimpse into a progressive mind?