Hera: Hercules Derangement Syndrome Part 4

As we enter the story, Hera is the Queen Goddess – but her husband , Zeus, is habitually with other women.

This is not so much a function of who Zeus is, as it is a by-product of fusing Ancient Greek’s mythology with their conquered peoples, matching their head god with Zeus to facilitate their integration into the Hellenic culture, but having the previous head queen goddess left over.

‘Obviously’, these were women Zeus had had affairs with, which challenged Hera’s position in the pantheon of deities.

OK, nasty but…

She had to keep her position, both as a goddess and as the queen of the Gods, being the wife of Zeus.

So, Hera had to ‘fight back’ to remain who she was.

I suspect that this is where this aspect of Hera, as the patron of wronged women, came from.

Regardless, Hera was the ultimate step-mother-from hell.

Is it really coincidence that her step-son was the ultimate masculine embodiment?

Hera: Hercules derangement syndrome part 3

Hera (Romanized as Juno).

She is the long suffering wife (and sister – this is the Egyptian influence on Greek mythology, where the Pharaoh married his sister to ‘keep the bloodlines pure’) who is the goddess of marriage, hearth (family home) and protector of women (especially during childbirth).

When Ancient Greeks conquered a people, they integrated their main god into Zeus, claiming they were really one and the same and making the cultural/social integration of the conquered peoples that much more possible. 

‘Integrating’ the ‘queen consort’ was much more difficult.  

The way that Ancient Greeks integrated their ‘head god’ Zeus into being just another interpretation of the conquered peoples’ ‘head god’ in order to harmonize the conquered people’s mythology with the Greek one – well, it dealt a rather raw deal to the ‘head queen’ of the conquered people’s pantheon:  the ‘head god’, Zeus, had a queen (Hera), so, who or what was this other queen goddess of the conquered peoples’ pantheon?

She became Zeus’s mistress.

They all did… and Hera ‘had to’ deal with it, within the constrains of the Ancient Greek Mythology – which she did, in epic Hera way, as has been recorded in myth of how she had treated Hercules.

Hera: Hercules Derangement Syndrome Background Part 2

When the Ancient Greeks would conquer another peoples, they would claim that their main God, the head of their pantheon, is just another manifestation of the Greek head god, Zeus (Romanized as Jupiter), so, there really is not that much of a difference between them.  They all worship the same capricious head god – this time, this side won, but if Zeus (by any other name) wanted, the other side would have won.  

No shame in defeat – God’s did it.  A way to ‘save face’…

We may not appreciate this now in our time, but, that is an extremely important aspect of integrating the defeated peoples’ culture into the winning one in a positive, constructive manner.

It seems that the Ancient Greeks understood (knowingly or not) that destroying a conquered culture’s ‘origin myth’ is devastating, for – what we now know – is a few generations.

So, whether by instinct, knowledge or wisdom, the Ancient Greeks avoided that.  

Instead of denigrating the defeated peoples’ mythology, they went out of their way to graft it on to their own mythology, thereby giving the conquered peoples’ a channel to integrate into the Greek culture.  This benefited both:  new blood, new ideas – but within the same overarching cultural framework that is necessary to hold a society together.

Which makes ‘integrating’ the various ‘goddess queens’ that much more difficult…(coming next)

Trump is not a Democrat or Republican, he is a Mercantilist.

Prove me wrong.

Please, prove me wrong.

There is a lot to unpack with President Donald Trump. Some of it is good and some of it is bad. No, I am not fence-sitting, I am being realistic.

Mercantilism is a better economic model than what Biden’s administration put forth, but, it is seriously inferior to Austrian Economics – even opposed to them at times.

Heck, there is even a really good conspiracy theory (that will never be proven or disproven, because the surrounding data had been systematically destroyed for political reasons, which may or may not have anything to do with theories of economy) that the Austro-Hungarian Prince had been assassinated (leading to Franz Josef being the successor to the crown) precisely because he was a proponent of the Austrian model of economics (think Von Mises) and was planning to put these principles into play upon his rising to the throne.

Yeah, a while ago.

But, this is a valid direction to ruminate in, as Mercantilism was most alive just before then, and was being uprooted by ‘the Austrian School of economics’.

Rooting out inefficiencies and underhanded ways that taxpayer money has been handed over to partisan actors – that is a good thing.

But, the mercantilist mindset is a bitter pill to swallow – if you want to support President Trump.

The most (sadly) interesting thing – from a disinterested 5,000m perspective – is that President Trump’s political opponents are not attacking him on the things that they should: they are being petty and short-sighted, without laying out a reasoned opposition to his mercantilism. It is as if they are working from ignorance, not knowledge.

And that is sad, very sad.

Why do we think God is ‘omnipotent’, ‘omniscient’?

OK, I am going on in a bit of a theological manner, but, I have had a few existential moments lately, so, perhaps that is why. For example, just a few hours ago, I was in a car accident – not hurt, just shaken a bit. A fender-bender.

The previous fender-bender I was in happened when I was taking my puppy in for cancer surgery and a philosophy student on her way to an exam lost control of her car in the snow…yes, a philosophy student.

Today’s fender-bender was minor, but the lady who backed into me in the parking lot did not understand why her car would no longer move backwards – she was so unaware that she had hit my car that she kept trying to back up into it, even as I was standing by her window and waving my arms to try to get her attention.

This sent me musing in so many directions…why do we do what we do, just how limited are we in both our observations and reasoning and why do we project so many of our fears into religions?

Because at the very root of it all, religions are about projecting fears and having them collectively assuaged. They cannot all be true – they are mutually exclusive, so…

Which makes me wonder: why do some religions – at least the most popular ones these days – have omniscient, omnipotent deities?

Yes, one per religion, that is rather definitional – cannot have two omnipotent beings, that would be a contradiction.

But, how did we arrive at this?

Ancient religions regarded Gods as sort of immortal humans with a few extra powers tossed in for good measure, but none of them were considered all powerful, all knowing…and certainly not all good.

Even the Abrahamic faiths are rooted in a view of God that is very much more limited and less unique than what most current Abrahamic worshippers I have spoken to about this are convinced of.

‘God’ did not know that Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. He had to question them to find out. He was shocked that they were hiding from him because they were ashamed of their nakedness…

Then, he rushed off to tell ‘the others’.

That is not ‘omniscient’ – or he would have known, without questioning Adam and Eve.

Then we come to ‘omnipotent’ – that directly contradicts the whole ‘free will’ idea for humans.

This one is a little more complex, so, please, bear with me.

God gives humans free will – to do as they wish, even if it means disobeying him.

But, he is also all-powerful, with the ability to control everything, yet he choses not to control the thought processes of humans.

This is a contradiction: if God wanted perfect slaves (of the mind), he could have created humans to both have freedom of thought and only think in patterns that do not cause him to condemn some of the most eternal suffering.

It is impossible to fully and willingly grant freedom of thought, then punish people with eternal suffering for exercising it – unless you are actually setting people up to fail so you can have an excuse to torture them.

So, why did we ever arrive at a point where we think God(s) are omnipotent?

Certainly not from The Bible – pick the one you prefer, from the Catholic to the Gnostic to the Old Testament: nothing in these religious texts suggests an onmiscient and omnipotent God: so, why do so many people believe that?

Remembering…

 

 

Having grown up on the wrong side of the Iron Curtain, everything I learned about the USA was just how bad and evil it was. And then there was this campfire song that people sang – well out of the hearing of the officials and their spies. It was called ‘John Brown’s Body’.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown%27s_Body

While there are many versions of this song in English, none are exactly the same as the one that I learned and loved to sing as a kid – but this one comes the closest. Please, enjoy

 

Here is some more background:

A Most Excellent Post – Censored from reddit

Yes, this site has been dormant for way too long.

This is because I have been very busy with working to achieve the goals promoted by this site from its inception through alternate means.  And, I have been doing some serious ‘growing up’ in the process.  But more on that later…

Today, I came across a post on reddit that I found most illuminating.  However, between when I first clicked on it and the time I was ready to comment on it, it had been censored.

Deleted.

Disappeared.

Gone down the ‘memory hole’…

Whatever the metaphor, it was made gone – as if the book-burners had had their way with it.

And so, my friends, with the permission of the author (a redditor by the name of ‘istillgetreallybored’), I bring you the banished, censored and book-burned post:

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE (this reee is dedicated in part to the cucked pedes who think they are alpha just because they voted for Trump)

They have to go back. Trump has reduced ISIS from 35k to 1k and the migrant crisis was a fraud to instigate a replacement program to further economic marxism as a means to controlling humans. We should have been helping (not causing the crisis would have been best) them in their country of origin which would have resulted in 100 fold cost savings and prevented this assimilation issue.

Islam does not recognize borders. Wake up.

For those who don’t have freeee speech.

The heart-war —- and that is the lowest form of the war. And it is that the Muslim should believe in his heart that the infidels are enemies to him and to his religion, and that he should desire their disappearance and the destruction of their power. And no Muslim can be imagined who is not under obligation to this degree of the war. Verily all the people of the Faith are under obligation to this amount without any question whatever, in whatever place they may be and in whatsoever condition they may be found. And that those concerning whom the exception made in the verse presented in the saying of the Most High holds good (You should abstain from them completely) to these it is permitted that they should be satisfied with this degree of the heart-war.3

Klara Samkova in Czech Parliament: Should We Fear Islam?

It is interesting that we don’t hear our politicians speak like this, is it not?

https://youtu.be/TnL3JWnhG6U

 

Aside:  it took me two days to translate, because even though I had the text and two other translations to work from, she wanders off the script and the arguments were not in the pre-prepared official text.  And the audio is terrible, especially when people are talking over each other.

I raise this point because I found it extremely interesting that after the Turkish Ambassador and some other notable guests had walked out in protest against what JuDr. Klara Samkova was saying, the moderator DID shut her down.

And he said that what she was saying is beyond ‘opinion’ and is, rather, ‘propaganda’.

Even though she has facts to back up everything she says…

Had it not been for the strong push-back from the audience, that brave lady standing up to the moderator and demanding to know who made him the authority to decide on what is or is not propaganda, she would not have been able to finish her speech.

She would also not have been permitted to finish had the other panelists convinced the moderator that if she were not permitted to deliver the rest of her speech, it would appear to be censorship and would be bad optics…

Even so, she was instructed to tone down her rhetoric before continuing – and, indeed, she did do that.  Which is when she frequently deviated from the official text…

Muhammad: The White Prophet with Black Slaves (David Wood)

Fall of Constantinople – Reply History