Ottawa 2010 Municipal Elections results

Well, the results are in.

Almost!

Some ward races were won by less than 100 votes, so recounts are very likely.

Still, there do appear to be a few new faces on the Ottawa City Council.  Not enough (in my never-humble-opinion), but some are better than none!  The results, as of now, are as follows:

Mayor:  Jim Watson

Ward races:

  1. Orleans:  Bob Monette
  2. Innes:  Rainer Bloess
  3. Barrhaven:  Jan Harder
  4. Kanata North:  Marianne Wilkinson
  5. West Carleton-March:  Eli El-Chantiry
  6. Kanata-Stittsville:  Shad Qadri
  7. Bay:  Mark Taylor
  8. College:  Rick Chiarelli
  9. Knoxdale-Merivale:  Keith Egli
  10. Gloucester-Southgate:  Diane Deans
  11. Beacon Hill-Cyrville:  Tim Tierney
  12. Rideau-Vanier:  Mathieu Fleury
  13. Rideau-Rockcliffe:  Peter Clark
  14. Somerset:  Diane Holmes
  15. Kitchissippi:  Katherine Hobbs
  16. River:  Maria McRae
  17. Capital:  David Chernushenko
  18. Alta Vista:  Peter Hume
  19. Cumberland:  Stephen Blais
  20. Osgoode:  Doug Thompson
  21. Rideau-Goulbourn:  Scott Moffat
  22. Gloucester-South Nepean:  Steve Desroches
  23. Kanata South:  Allan Hubley

OPP Detective Sgt. Jim Smyth – excellent work

‘Everybody’ has been following the trial of Col. Russel Williams… who had just been sentenced to 25 years in jail with no possibility of parole.

All that needs to be said about what he did has probably already been said – and I’ll not bore you by repeating it.

What I do want to call your attention to is the absolutely awesome work done by OPP’s Behaviour Sciences Section Detective Sgt. Jim Smyth.  Honestly, I am rather impressed by how quickly this Williams guy  has been caught:  a highly skilled military man… he had skills well beyond what one might expect of an ‘ordinary’ criminal.

And, he had been trained how to withstand interrogation, too.  Which is what makes Sgt. Jim Smyth’s accomplishment while interrogating Williams that much more impressive.

Here is part of the interrogation video, as posted by the Global Toronto.  Sgt. Smyth – well done!

My sympathy to all the victims of this criminal and their families.

However, I do get very angry when some people attempt to group Russel Williams’ wife, Mary Elisabeth Harriman, in with the victims!

That very idea is highly offensive.  Remember, Harriman is employed by a charity organization – and draws a ‘six-figure-salary’...  in my eyes, this makes her a kind of a rapist, too!

 

Prostituting the legal system….

Yesterday, a Toronto judge struck down as unconstitutional three laws which many Canadians regarded as the key legislation against prostitution.

I have been rather preoccupied in publishing the responses Ottawa Municipal election candidates have sent me as an answer to the questions I asked them (it took me about 50 hours to develop the list of questions itself – I was not about to slack off on posting any and all responses I got to it!!!).  As such, I have not really had much of a chance to see the reactions to the ruling…..  In other words, my ‘take’ on it is not influenced by having noted any of the reactions to it ‘out there’!

Well, the government which governs the least, governs the best!

The legal situation, as it was before this ruling, was ridiculous beyond belief!

The logic – if one can call it that – of the laws surrounding ‘prostitution’ in Ontario was so twisted, it is about time they were struck down!

‘Prostitution’ itself was not illegal in Canada.  Perhaps it was because even the lawmakers understood that their jurisdiction does not extend to governing our bodies (OK – they still need to figure this out with respect to what I choose to put inside it, from sugar or salt of hydrogenated oils to any other chemical compound), perhaps there is something else – I am simply not legally informed enough to know this. The fact remains that Ontario had no law which made ‘prostitution’ ‘illegal’.

However, there was a catch….

There were three laws which made it illegal to:

  • enter into a contract regarding prostitution (solicitation)
  • to accept, as payment, money earned through prostitution (living off the avails of prostitution)
  • to practice prostitution indoors (operate a house of prostitution)

Yes, for many people whose religious beliefs condemn prostitution, the term is highly charged.  If so, I would like to invite you to simply replace the term with something which will permit you to evaluate the legal situation more impartially.

Again, I stress that this is NOT to be an evaluation of ‘prostitution’:  only of the legal mess ‘governing’ it.  These are two separate matters.  One is a matter of morality – something each person should arrive at their own conclusions about.  The other is the quality (or lack thereof) of laws Ontario and Canada have on this activity.

This ‘exercise’ is only meant to address the laws themselves – not the practice they address.

So, we have:

  • an activity which is not illegal

BUT

  • entering into a legal contract regarding this legal activity is illegal

In what world does THAT make sense?

We also have

  • a perfectly legal activity

BUT

  • even though it does not present any greater danger to participate in said activity indoors (like, say, storing bbq-gas-tanks would), it is illegal to have an indoor place to participate in it

D-ugh!?!?!?!

Again, this is a logically inconsistent law.

Oh, I understand the intent of it!  After all, when it is -40 degrees outside, being forced to perform sexual acts outdoors tends to shrink the practice….

But that is, at best, a dishonest law!  The lawmakers knew they could not get away with outlawing the practice, as it would breech a person’s inherent rights to do with their own body as they please, so they try to slime their way out of it!!!  Shame on them!

And, perhaps most ridiculously, we have

  • a perfectly legal activity to earn income

BUT

  • it is illegal to spend any money earned this way AND it is illegal for a person to accept, as payment for services rendered, any money earned through this activity by their customer

In other words, if a prostitute hired a book-keeper, and this book-keeper accepted (as payment for her/his services in providing bookkeeping) money that their client earned through prostitution, it is the book-keeper who had committed an illegal act!

Of course, book-keepers are not the only ones who could be criminally charged not because of anything THEY did themselves, but because their clients earned their money through one specific – perfectly legal – activity!!!

If a prostitute had a cleaning-lady, the cleaning-lady (or cleaning-gentleman:  I once knew a couple who earned their living this way together, so I want to make sure to be inclusive here), this person could ALSO be facing criminal charges.  NOT for something he or she did  – but because of the specific legal way their boss earned the money he or she paid them with.

Same goes for cooks, babysitters, body-guards, hairdressers, or any other service provider.  WHAT they did was irrelevant.  HOW their client earned their money could  make them face criminal charges!

THOSE WERE BAD LAWS!!!

(…and that is using very mild language….)

Aside:  Please, remember ‘Xanthippa’s First Law of Human Dynamics’ – each and every law (or rule) WILL, eventually, be applied to its maximum potential illogical extreme!

Under these laws, a lawyer who was hired to represent a bank-robber – and was paid with illegally acquired money – would NOT be breaking the laws…..but a lawyer hired by a prostitute and paid with LEGALLY EARNED money COULD face criminal charges!!!!

However you look at it, these laws were in serious need of being struck down.

So, what about the morality of prostitution?

What does THAT matter?!?!?!?

Governments must NEVER be permitted to legislate MORALITY!!!!

…blogging has been light…

When I said that ‘blogging will be light’, I had not realized just HOW light it would be….

However, technical difficulties aside, I have started posting the replies to my questions which the Ottawa municipal candidates have been kind enough to send me.  I must admit I was pleasantly surprised just how many responses I received, as well as with how well many had answered…

I am still posting the answers (and ward by ward overviews of who’s running, their website (if I know it) and a link to the response to my questions), so more ‘stuff’ will be popping up, but if you’d like to check the site out, you can do so here.

In the meantime, I’ve been asked for the link to this interesting article by so many people I’ve mentioned it to, I’d better post it here for your entertainment!

Photos from Watson/McGuinty protest rally on September 18th, 2010

(Updated to include a video link)

Today, there was a protest at Jim Watson’s election office. I was there, taking photos.

(And, yes – they even let me say a few words….but I was so nervous, having NEVER spoken in public before, I covered barely a quarter of the stuff I prepared.  Some people took videos – I’ll post them when I see them.) As always,  the ladies organizing the rally were there (and I DO use the term ‘ladies’ in the best sense).

Debbie Jodoin:

Shirley Mosley used puppets to illustrate how Mr. McGuinty’s puppet, Mr. Watson, hippety-hoppeties from Municipal to Provincial to Municipal politics:

Mr. Nick Vandergraght was a crowd favourite:

As was Sharon, also from CFRA:

Ruth Parent, a behind-the-scenes helper to Debbie and Shirley during these protests also said a few words:

And, ‘Debbie’s sound guy’ – who has a YouTube channel called ‘TheUnsustainableTaxpayer’ where he uploads the videos from the protest, also spoke passionately:  

Despite technical difficulties, Sam also spoke:

A very pleasant surprise was that ‘Calculus’ (as he is known on this blog) came and said hello (our first real-life meeting ever): Suzanne from BigBlueWave also said hi to me:  when her video is up, I’ll post it! And, of course, there were many ‘disgruntled citizens’, exercising their freedom:

As usual, if you want any of these (or of the 200 or so other pictures I took) in higher resolution, comment and I will contact you with the pictures requested.

The videos will be posted as they come online.

It looks like they’ll let me say a few words…

While I am not one of the organizers of the September 18th demonstration in front of Jim Watson’s office (and, yes – it is rumoured that Mr. Watson himself plans to attend the protest rally), they WILL let me say a few words…

Mr. Watson has been campaigning on the premise that he works through ‘consensus building’ – something he claims is a ‘positive’ thing which his opponent lacks.

I intend to say a few words as to what exactly that means:  and why governing through ‘consensus building’ is anti-democracy!

If you want to learn more, please, come to the rally (if you can):

Date:  September 18th, 2010

Time:  High Noon

Place:  Jim Watson’s campaign office, 1355 Richmond Rd., Ottawa

UPDATE: They did!

‘Moderate’ imam Musri: is he ‘al-Qaida in Armani’?

Via  BCF:

Tom Trento from the FloridaSecurityCouncil.org makes an urgent appeal for information about imam Musri, the man who attempted to mediate between the ‘Koran-burning’ preacher Jones and the Park51 imam Rauf:

Update: here is one starting point to dig….with many links.

Thunderf00t: ‘The Real threat from Islam’

Oooops!

It seems that, yet again, Thunderf00t needs to explain that by treating Islam exactly the same way he treats ALL religions and creeds, he is not a ‘bigot’ or a ‘racist’ who is  ‘picking’ on Islam:

Was the ‘Koran-burning preacher’ Terry Jones duped by the moderate imam Musri?

While checking out TheReligionOfPeace, I came across this story.

Instead of trying to simply retell what the article says, let me try to re-construct some plausible approximation of how it might possibly had happened.

First, we have the ‘Ground Zero Mosque’.  And, yes – the undercarriage of one of the airplanes that hit ‘The Towers’ on 11/09/2001 actually fell on top of this building and damaged it:  this makes the building ‘Ground Zero‘. Imam Rauf, who is building the Ground Zero Mosque  cannot, by any reasonable person, be called ‘moderate’ – not with what has been learned about him… and certainly not based on his behaviour.

Anyhow…

Yesterday (Wednesday), imam Rauf is quoted in the linked article as saying that

‘nothing is off the table’  when asked whether he would consider moving the site.

Today, (Thursday), Donald Trump is reported to have offered that he would buy the building from imam Rauf for 25% more than it had cost him:  not because he wants the building, but because he would like to end the controversy amicably.  Considering that imam Rauf and his gang had paid $4.8 million for the damaged building, Mr. Trump is truly putting his money where his mouth is.

So far so good.

But things go from good to bad rather fast.

A nutty and, by the sounds of it, somewhat unpopular preacher Terry Jones from Florida got annoyed by something and declared September 11th, 2010, to be ‘International Burn-the-Koran Day’.  (No, not a ‘Burn-an-imam Day’ – just destroying some inanimate objects he owns.)

Could it have been the very existence of the Mosque at Ground Zero?  Or, perhaps the speed with which it’s breezing through all the building permits while St. Nicholas Orthodox Church, the tiny little churched destroyed as the South Tower collapsed on top of it, appears to be fatally entangled in the red tape which denies its reconstruction?  Or was it hearing about the hundreds of bibles burned by Iran?

Perhaps he was expressing solidarity with the Muslims in Iran who have posted this video of themselves, burning the Koran, as a symbol of protest against the oppressive theocracy which is ruining their country? (Thanks, BCF, for digging this one up.)

Perhaps it was a little bit or everything.

Perhaps he was simply exercising his freedom of religion!

Whatever the cause, the fact remains that preacher Jones is well within his rights to destroy his own property, however he chooses to, and nobody has the right to meddle!

Of course, meddle they did.

And this is where it gets rather ugly…

‘Everyone’  has been meddling!

It was just ugly when it was just the usual media lackeys who condemned him.

It was emotional blackmail and just idiotic when people ‘all over’ tried to make him somehow responsible for the potential actions of other people.  Yet, that is exactly what happened!

But when General Petraeus, the American Troops top commander in Afghanistan, came out and started telling anyone who’d listen that how a specific citizen of the USA chooses to exercise his Constitutionally guaranteed rights, he’ll be guilty of putting American troops into danger – that is when it gets downright scary!

Since when do we live in a society which permits military generals to dictate who gets to exercise their Constitutional rights, and how?  Do we even WANT to live in such a society?

Of course, the media ignored the constitutional rights issue and instead of demanding that General Petraeus be stripped of his position and dishonourably discharged from the military (the minimum reasonable reaction to a general caught bullying civilians out of their civil rights) , they have given the military man a pass and continued to beat up on the nutty preacher.  Sad, even if predictable.

Of course, this is not where it ended.

US President Obama – the guy who found nothing offensive in decades of reverend Jeremiah Wright‘s ‘God Damn America’ sermons – condemned his own citizen for exercising his freedom of religion. In this abc piece, Obama is quoted as saying (regarding Terry Jones’s plan to exercise his freedom of religion):

“If he’s listening, I just hope he understands that what he’s proposing to do is completely contrary to our values … this country has been built on the notions of religious freedom and religious tolerance,”

In other words, Obama says that the USofA ‘has been built on the NOTIONS(?!?) of religious freedom’, but believes that exercising them is ‘completely contrary’ to American values.  (I am presuming here that when Obama says ‘ours’, he actually DOES mean ‘American’.)

Does Obama really not realize what is coming out of his mouth?!?!?

Last night, the internet provider pulled the plug on the prea

Today, when Secretary of Defense Gates did not only not fire Petraeus, but actually personally phoned Jones up and parroted Obama and the disgraceful general, preacher Jones began to show cracks.

So, let me recap.

So far, we have tons of pressure on preacher Jones to cancel his ‘Burn-a-Koran Day’ day, which he is ostensibly holding as an exercise of his freedom of religion, because he is so annoyed with imam Rauf’s arrogant project which has created so much discord in the American psyche.

We also have imam Rauf claiming ‘nothing is off the table’ when he was asked if he would be willing to move the mosque’s location to a less controversial spot.

Donald Trump takes imam Rauf seriously and offers to buy out the ‘Park 51’ property from him while giving imam Rauf a 25% return on his investment.

In comes the ‘moderate’ imam Musri,reportedly  an influential Muslim from Florida.

Preacher Jones meets with imam Musri and comes out of the meeting convinced (rightly or wrongly) that since the Ground Zero Mosque builders have agreed to move their project, he is calling off the ‘Burn-the-Koran Day’!

Yes, he has called the ‘Burn-the-Koran Day’ off!

But, he has done so in the honest belief that the reason for his decision to so publicly exercise his freedom of religion by burning the Koran was no longer there – that the thorn has been removed from his side!

Alas, not so!

Once the ‘Burn-a-Koran Day’ was called off, the ‘moderate’ imam Musri says that there must have been a misunderstanding:  he only promised that the two of them (Musri and Jones) would travel to New York to seek an audience with imam Rauf in order to ask him to, please, be so kind as to consider, may be, perhaps, moving his project elsewhere.

If he’d like to.

Pretty please.

Gee – how could such a misunderstanding have come about?!?!?

On a completely unrelated note – have you ever heard of the Islamic concept of  ‘taqiyya’?

A letter from Afghanistan to Dalton McGuinty’s EA

First of all, I would like to thank this soldier – both for what he is doing for all of us in Afghanistan, putting himself in danger tto keep us and our kids are safe, and for taking time to write to Dalton McGuinty’s EA and asking for an explanation of how ‘freedom of speech and assembly’ became ‘privileges’.

Now, to explain…

There has been a series of recent protests against Dalton McGuinty, the Premier of Ontario, organized by two Ottawa taxpayers, Debbie Jodoin and Shirley Mosley.  Ms. Jodoin is so upset with Mr. McGuinty’s policies, she has decided to seek a nomination for the Conservative Party to run against Mr. McGuinty, in his riding, during next year’s Provincial election.

The protests have attracted some attention – and Mr. McGuinty’s ‘office’ began subtle intimidation tactics against the demonstration organizers, especially Ms. Jodoin.  This culminated in a letter Mr. McGuinty’s Exacutive Assistant, John Fraser, had written and emailed to Ms. Jodoin.

Not only did Mr. Fraser see fit to email it to Ms. Jodoin at work, he also emailed it to each and every one of her co-workers – and her boss.  In the email, Mr. Fraser admonishes Ms. Jodoin not to forget to obey the laws….  Yeah, employer’s just LOVE to get emails addressed to their employees which imply that without a ‘friendly reminder’ from the office of the Premier, this employee could not be counted on to obey the law of the land!

If the intimidation were not enough, Mr. Fraser’s letter (officially sent as coming from the Premier’s office) also included the following phrase:

“I think we can agree that free speech and the right to assemble are both a privilege and a cornerstone of our democracy.”

With Ms. Jodoin’s permission, I posted the full letter, along with the context (Mr. Fraser thought it necessary to come up to Ms. Jodoin just prior to the demonstration and ensure she agrees to follow the laws – the Ottawa Police were there in force, and even brought along a paddy-vagon…you know, just in case!)

Well, a few other blogs picked up on this, thanks to a great deal to MooseAnd Squirrel, BlazingCatfur and all the rest of the bloggers who picked up the story.  The story made it around the world.  Yesterday, BlazingCatfur posted a letter which a soldier, serving in Afghanistan as a member of Canadian Armed Forces, had sent to Mr. Fraser in response to the Jodoin letter.

He writes:

“One can not even imagine the sheer delight, as I try in many ways to convey to my troops that free speech and the right to assemble are a privilege.”

Read the full letter here.

And, if I ever have the honour to shake this person’s hand, the beverages will be on me!