The Nicky Larkin movie about the Israel-Palestine conflict sucks

OK – I apologize:  I publicized the screening of this thing.

I take it back.

I really really really looked forward to seeing it.  Unusually, even my hubby was interested in seeing it.

So, we went.

The movie place was packed.

There was an expectant hum in the audience!

Fred’s introduction only built up the excitement!!!

Then, the filmmaker – Nicky Larkin himself – told us he could not stand to watch the movie again and went out for a beer.

That should have been a hint…

But, we were excited and wanted to see this fresh new balanced view of the Israel-Palestine conflict!

The movie opened up well enough, but then the narration started.  The sound seemed muffled – sort of like listening to someone speak through a really poor-quality speaker at a drive-through place.  Honestly, I still don’t know what language that narration was in – and I do speak a few… Perhaps it was Hebrew or Arabic, in order to ‘set the tone’.

OK.

Still excited.

That lasted for I guess about 10 minutes.

Not the excitement – the impossible-to-understand narration.

Then the movie went seriously downhill.

I don’t know what kind of movies this Nicky Larkin has made in the past, but – do you know how some people try to ‘artsy-up’ really cheap porno movies by sticking in very tacky audio-visual effects?

Well, this movie is chock full of them…

…without the benefit of naked people.

Many people were walking out – and looking nauseous.

I understood less than 10 percent of what was actually said in the movie – well, up until the time we walked out, anyway.

Perhaps the ending makes up for it…I wouldn’t know.

This ought to make religions think twice about hiding pedophile predators!

The recipient of this legal smackdown – to the tune of  almost 23 million USD – are the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

In a precedent setting ruling, Candace Conti was awarded 28 million USD – 7 is damages and 21 punitive.  (The Jehovah’s Witnesses are to pay the 21 million in punitive damages and 40% of the 7 million in damages.)

‘A substantial part of her allegations dealt with claims that the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York (the organisation that oversees the Jehovah’s Witnesses) had adopted a policy in 1989 that instructed congregation leaders to keep child abuse allegations secret. This meant that when Conti’s abuser from the 1990s, Jonathan Kendrick, was convicted in 2004 of molesting another girl, the elders at the North Fremont Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses did nothing to prevent him coming into contact with other kids at the church.’

Of course, he re-offended – and the ‘Church’ is being punished for not taking precautions as well as for not having revealed his history when he did eventually molest another child.

I suppose that making them financially accountable is the only way these organizations which hide behind piety and enforce silence on their congregation through ‘eternal blackmail’ will sit up and start paying attention!

We are not as gullible as we used to be!

We will not permit pedophiles to pray on children, just because they pretend to be ‘closer to god’ than the rest of us!

And, we will not let organizations hide pedophiles just because they play the ‘religion’ card!

As a matter of fact, let’s go a step further:  let’s let people believe whatever batpoop-crazy stuff they want, but let’s hold those who profit/make their living from marketing  it live up to the same consumer protection laws that every other commercial entity has to.

If you can prove the claims about your product (that would be your dogma) – continue to sell it.

If not – then let’s call fraud a fraud.

While you’re at it – start paying your fair share of taxes on your highly lucrative commercial enterprises!

And if you don’t think that religious organizations are highly lucrative commercial enterprises, then I have this bridge here I’d like to sell you.  It’s a great deal:  you pay me now, get the bridge after you die!

Oh – and here is an afterthought:  stop mutilating your children in the name of religion!  It is NOT your religious right to violate the bodily integrity of another human being!!!  (Plus being this obsessed with your kids genitals is seriously creepy – please, seek professional help!)

(Sorry – pedophiles make me angry.  Organizations that hide, protect and enable them make me angrier…  People who mutilate their own kids in the name of their own religion – they make me about as angry as angry can get!)

United States of Arabia?!?!?

What do you do if terrorists killed your family?

Unfortunately, I know someone in that situation…

His wife, daughter and son were all killed in a terrible terrorist attack.

I suspect that if I were in that position, I would simply crumple up and die inside – and, perhaps, outside.

Yet, one Canadian doctor turned his personal tragedy around and founded a way to make his family’s memory live on through his charitable work.

He is a true-life hero.

On Saturday, 23rd of June, 2012, at Andrew Haydon Park in Ottawa, from 11am to 5pm, all kinds of people from Ottawa will be donating food and their efforts in an Indian Food Fair fundraiser for his charities.

He delivers the charity himself – so, if you want to contribute to help the poorest of the poorest in this world without needing to worry about fraud taking a huge chunk of your contributions, this is your chance!

Or, if you love Indian food and want the best, most authentic Indian food ever – this is your opportunity!!!

Or, if you just want to come for the multicultural fun and drop a looney or twooney into the donation box, this is your chance!!!

I, for one, would not miss if for the world!

Irish Filmmaker Nicky Larkin tells the truth about Israel…

UPDATE:  Here are my thoughts on the movie – it sucks!

Brought to you by the Free Thinking Film Society.

Ottawa:  18th of June, 2012, 7 pm, Library & Archives Canada

Montreal:  19th of June, 2012, 7 pm, Chabad of the Town, 4054 rue Jean-Talon Ouest

Toronto:  20th of June, 2012, 7:30 pm, 15 Hove Street * Toronto

For more information on the Montreal and Toronto events, please contact chershon@bnaibrith.ca

About the movie:

‘Irish filmmaker Nicky Larkin went to Israel to make the standard “Israel is Evil” documentary, but had a change of heart once he started filming. Here’s your chance to meet Nicky in person, see his documentary and hear why he changed his mind about Israel.

“Israel is a refuge — but a refuge under siege, a refuge where rockets rain death from the skies. And as I made the effort to empathise, to look at the world through their eyes. I began a new intellectual journey. One that would not be welcome back home.

The problem began when I resolved to come back with a film that showed both sides of the coin. Actually there are many more than two. Which is why my film is called Forty Shades of Grey. But only one side was wanted back in Dublin. My peers expected me to come back with an attack on Israel. No grey areas were acceptable.’

Here is what Vlad Tepes has to say about Nicky Larkin:

‘Here’s a film maker who has chosen to walk a lonely path in Ireland’s artist community, due to his awakening to the truth behind the Arabs’ conflict with Israel, which speaks greatly of his courage and moral compass. He’s been confronted with a reality that runs counter to the one carefully prepared for him by his peers and society at large.

Nicky Larkin not only challenges himself, but his countrymen as well, by sharing this completely different Irish perspective on the conflict. It’s a perspective rarely discussed in Ireland, let alone mulled over, which speaks greatly of the vice-grip hold anti-Israel forces have on that society. Larkin’s efforts offer a ray of hope that rational and reasonable debate on the conflict is indeed possible in Ireland, lets hope that his colleagues take up the challenge.’

There will be a Q&A with the filmmaker following the screening:  it promises to be a very interesting evening!

Muslim Brotherhood in America – the course

It is difficult to understand the impact of much of the news we hear if we lack the context in which to evaluate it.  While I have educated myself on Islam and even early Middle Eastern history in order to better understand the cultural context which gave rise to this major world religion.

Still, this does not mean that I understand all the intricacies of the modern network of Muslim organizations.  Without understanding this, how can I recognize the difference between truly moderate Muslim voices (whom we need to help be heard) and shameless fronts for Islamists?

The ‘litmus test’ I usually use is ‘Sharia’:  Muslims who have attempted to escape Sharia tend to be moderate voices of reason while Muslims who support Sharia, by definition, wish to impose their religious views onto their neighbors….  This may be a good ‘rule of thumb’, but it does not help me understand the complexities of the various Muslim organizations in North America.

Here is something that might help get one started:  a 10-part course about the history and activities of Muslim Brotherhood in America.

Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

Part 5:

Part 6:

Part 7:

Part 8:

Part 9:

Part 10:

Claudia Rosett: UNESCO’s Influence Efforts in D.C.

An interesting speech:

So, when can we leave the UN?!?!?

That whole organization is corrupt to the core…

The Dr. Dawg saga continues…

Last year, I reported on the courtroom proceedings in the defamation lawsuit John Baglow (aka Dr. Dawg) had brought against Connie and Mark Fournier:  part 1 and part 2.

The judge in that hearing dismissed it in a summary judgment for the Fourniers.  (In his ruling, it seemed clear to me  that the judge did not think Mr. Baglow had handled things well…)

John Baglow appealed.

Now, a panel of 3 judges has ruled that Dr. Dawg will have his day in court:

‘Questions about what constitutes defamation in the caustic world of blogging have not been addressed by Canadian courts “in any significant way,” Blair noted. It means, he said, that a full-blown trial is needed to explore key questions…

In other words, the case may indeed be vexatious, but the judges want to make new laws to govern the internet – and plan to do it on the Fourniers’ dime!

Ayayayayay!

When I know the details of when/where the case will be heard by the court, I’ll update this post.

UPDATE:  While there is still no word of the court date/time, I have received a comment on this from Connie Fournier:

This case will be going to a full-blown trial now and there will be expert witnesses and a full examination of the role of defamation law in the blogosphere.  This is of critical importance to any Canadian who operates a website where visitors are allowed to post comments.  If the law stands as it is, anyone who operates such a site should have $50,000 in the bank so that they can defend themselves when Spockluver sues CaptKirkFan for defaming his online persona.’

 

Good news/bad news in the field of electronic communication

The bad new is – predictably – coming from legislators.  This time, in the UK.

They are introducing a bill which would force all internet service providers (ISPs) to monitor, log and store all electronic communication.  But more than just that:  they would also collect data about the physical electronic equipment used in the communication, who is communicating with whom and a long list of other intrusive measures.  And, yes – physical communication would be similarly monitored, copying addresses from envelopes and packages and keeping the info for the government’s reference…

But, don’t worry!  Home Office Secretary Theresa May said:

 “Unless you are a criminal, then you’ve nothing to worry about from this new law.”

Ooooooh, that makes me feel all warm and fuzzy…

OK, so the governments all over the world are using the fact that we are all distracted by the looming economic crisis (created by their corruption) to impose ever more intrusive surveillance on us.

And we should not worry, unless we are criminals!

Until, that is, the government decides that holding the views we hold makes us criminals…

Well, before we all get too depressed, let me get to the good news – predictably, from the world of science and technology.

While quantum cryptography has not quite delivered the desired level of security through encrypted communication that many of us had hoped it would, it seems that emerging technology based on the good old second law of thermodynamics just might give us a glimmer of hope!

‘Once again the secrecy is guaranteed by the laws of physics but instead of quantum mechanics, Kish and co say the second law of thermodynamics provides the necessary underwriting. That’s the same law that prohibits perpetual motion machines powered by heat from the environment.’

The goal of achieving securely encrypted communication is always to make sure the two parties communicating can decrypt the signal but anyone intercepting the message would lack the tools to decode it.  This newly announced method sounds great and secure.

Let’s hope it becomes generally used by ‘everyone’  before surveillance laws leave us frightened and silenced!

UKIP Nigel Farage on Spanish Bailout- The genius of Mutual indebtedness – June 2012

Sure, I like the cheaper gas – but the reason for the price drop is, at best, troubling…