We need a separation between the UN and Islam

We, in the West, have taken for granted that there should be a separation between The State (government) and religious organizations.  This is, in no way, a universal sentiment.

To the contrary:  throughout human history, tyrants have relied on religious control over their populace to stay in power.  In the dawns of our civilization, we had ‘priest kings’, individuals who held the reins of State and religion firmly within their grasp.  Up until quite recently, European monarchies accepted the authority of the Catholic Pope to be the Kingmaker:  these mutually supporting tyrannies effectively enslaved the population.  It was not until the development of religious plurality in Europe that these shackles were broken and the age of enlightenment and reason brought us the modern era of prosperity and freedom.

It would indeed be difficult to argue that had we not rejected the collusion of State and Religion, we would be enjoying our current standard of living.

Yet, we must never forget that separation of State and Religion is the exception, not the rule in human societies.  Even today.

Therein lies the peril in ‘world government’ schemes, like the United Nations.

Because secular governments built on the consitutional democracy principle represent a minority of human population, it would be unreasonable to expect any government which is representative of all the world to reflect this minority trend.

This is why we should not be shocked by UN’s attempts to pass anti-blasphemy laws.

Since religious control over government is the norm, not the exception, it is not surprising that religions from outside the constitutional democracies would be jockeying for control over the UN.  And, since they are the only ones in the race, it ought not be surprising that they are indeed succeeding.

Islam, of course, forms the largest ‘block’ in this effort:  it really is only a question of time before Sharia will be imposed by the UN on all its member states.

Does this sound too far fetched?

Please, consider the following:  in the latest ‘Army Day Military Parade’, the Ayatollahs in Iran paraded UN military vehicles as part of their State military equipment.

Time to leave the UN – unless it is already too late!

VictimlessCriminal: Religion is The Great Hijacker

Yes!

One of my favourite YouTubers has re-surfaced, with a whole crop of most excellent videos!

VictimlessCriminal has brought us videos that warn of how the Lisbon Treaty lists pedophilia as a grounds on which a person may not be discriminated against,  Islam’s attitude towards women and now, he has turned to looking at religions in general.

I cannot immediately find his videos from a few years ago, but he does have a latest series out, entitled ‘Religion is The Great Hijacker‘.  His goal is not to argue agains belief in divine beings or indeed in trying to draw a distinction between theists and atheists.  He states that, having been on both sides of that division, he regards it as more artificial than we would all like to think…

Rather, what he wants to do is to shine a light at what part of the human experience had been hijacked by religions and used to enforce its dogma, in order that we can take ownership of what is rightly ours.

Part 1:  Introduction

Part 2: Bankruptcy

Part 3:  Morality

Part 4:  Sin

Part 5:  Confession

Part 6:  The Soul

Part 7:  Comfort

Part 8:  Justice

Part 9:  Miracles

Part 10:  Charity

C.G.P. Grey: 5 Historical Misconceptions Rundown

 

Wikileak’s Assange interviews Hizbullah’s Nasrallah

How he can say this with a straight face….

Chris Schafer: 30th Anniversary of the Charter

 

Open Letter to Jan Harder and Lisa MacLeod

While this is a local issue, affecting the residents of Ottawa, the implications of the position of these two politicians is bigger than just the local issue involved.

In a nutshell, a school in Ottawa, Broadview Avenue Public School, is old and falling apart.  Not only is the environment becoming dangerous because of the floodings and the occasional fires that happen in the school, the school has also been found to be chock full of asbestos, have lead water pipes and to contain mercury – just what little kids need…

The school board had earmarked some money for repairing the school, but, following the latest little fire, the asbestos and all the other environmental hazards were discovered.  It is precisely because of these latest findings that the school board had decided that instead of repairing this building (and shaking all those asbestos fibres into the air, where little kiddies can better inhale them), the whole building ought to be condemned and a new school built in its place.

The full depth of the problems at Broadview was simply not known before now:  but, once it was revealed a few weeks ago, the school board rightly decided to act quickly to protect the kids and voted to rebuild the school instead of trying to fix this toxic dump.

Following this vote, two politicians (neither of whom is elected to the school board) have singled out one of the trustees who had voted for the rebuild and have demanded that she change her vote within two weeks or resign.

It is to these two politicians – Jan Harder, a career City of Ottawa Councillor, and Lisa MacLeod who is an opposition member in the Ontario Legislature, that I am addressing this open letter.

*   *   *

Dear Ms. Harder and Ms. MacLeod:

One of the qualities which defines our human condition is the protectiveness we feel towards children.  It is therefore not surprising that politicians would choose this topic to try to cash-in on this commendable sentiment.

By writing the letter to Donna Blackburn, a duly elected trustee of the Ottawa Carleton District School Board, and demanding that she either change her vote or resign, you have demonstrated your own unfitness to hold public office.  It is not just the inappropriateness of attempting to force an elected official to vote a certain way – something you, as elected officials yourselves, ought to know is deeply in appropriate, the way you have done it reveals that you are woefully uninformed about the underlying issues.

First, let’s focus on your motivation:  you are both on record as commenting that by rebuilding Broadview Avenue Public School, your constituents will suffer.  You have also both stated during interviews that you have targeted Donna Blackburn because she represents the same constituents as you do, confirming that your rhetoric is nothing more that short-sighted ‘NIMBY-ism’.  In other words, your actions have demonstrated that your concern is not for the education system in Ottawa but simply the fate of the people who vote directly for yourselves.   This shows that despite your pretensions, your actual motives are quite crass.

Ok – that is fine.  You want to get re-elected so you play to your voters.  That is understandable.  However, pretending to do otherwise – as you two have – is dishonest.

You have both criticized Ms. Blackburn, saying she does not know the facts and does not understand the underlying issues, implying that you, yourselves, know better.  You have both stated in interviews that rebuilding Broadview will harm your constituents.

Are you not even aware that children from within both your constituencies do indeed attend Broadview?

Yes, madams, Broadview does indeed serve your constituents!

Having long been a center of excellence in learning, Broadview offers unique educational programs in English and French for both gifted students and for exceptionally gifted students.  As such, gifted students from the whole western region of Ottawa are bused to Broadview.  Indeed, parents of bright children often start having them tested in grade 1 in order to have them identified as sufficiently gifted to begin attending Broadview’s most excellent program from grade 5.

Another factual error in your narrative is regarding the use of portable classrooms.  Ms. Harder especially has been vocal in demanding that schools that have portables ought to be the first to be improved and expanded.  Certainly, it is criticism-worthy that brand new schools are being built which have many portables:  but the problem there is in the planning stage and criticism ought to be directed there.  Why are new schools being built with inadequate capacity?

Is it perhaps because there is an expectation that as newly constructed neighbourhoods mature, the need for school spots will decline, making the portables in Barrhaven a responsible solution to a temporary problem?

Is it, perhaps, that it is precisely schools within ‘mature’ neighbourhoods, where the young-family ratio has stabilized, but which still require portable classrooms, that truly require expansion?

Broadview Avenue Public school is indeed in such a mature neighbourhood.  And, it also has a number of portables – and has for years.  So, saying that Broadview should not be rebuilt because schools with portables need it more demonstrates the depth of Ms. Harder’s ignorance.

Ms. Harder:  you have been elected to the Ottawa City Council – and not for the first time.  Yet, on your watch, the City of Ottawa continues to dump raw sewage into the Ottawa River.  Until you solve the problems you were actually elected to solve, please, do not delve into topics which are not within your jurisdictional scope and which you have clearly demonstrated you are not knowledgable about.

Ms. MacLeod:  You are the Education critic in our Provincial Legislature.  This should tell you something:  for the last two elections, your party failed to get elected – both times, the key issue on which you lost voter support was, indeed, education.

Under John Tory – whose election platform and, specifically, his proposed educational policy you have personally supported (and I did receive an email from you at that time specifically confirming this), your party snatched defeat from the jaws of victory solely on the issue of education.  Then, under Tim Hudak, it seemed impossible that you would lose to the unpopular McGuinty  Liberals.  Yet again, once Mr. Hudak revealed his education platform, your party began to lose votes – returning the detestable Mr. McGuinty to power.

Does this not tell you what the people of Ontario think of your views on education?

Ms. MacLeod, a politician who so callously exploits her own child as a political prop and whose educational policy has lost them not one, but two elections ought not tell duly elected officials whom the public actually trust to look after our education how to vote! 

Madams, you have overstepped your role in a most disturbing fashion which, in my never-humble-opinion, requires an investigation to determine if your attempts at influence-peddling have crossed the line into criminal.  Please, do the honourable thing and resign.

Immediately.

Sincerely yours,

Alexandra Belaire

P.S.  This letter – as well as any response you might wish to make to it, will be published at Xanthippa’s Chamberpot.  It is also being forwarded to some media.

The Last Tyranny in Europe

The mainstream media is not really shouting loudly about the horrible tyranny in Belarus – which does not mean that we should simply sweep what is going on there under the rug.  We must stand up for human rights of all people – even far away in a forgotten corner of Europe…

Like Mr. Hannan, I think we should stand up and condemn what is going on there and lend moral – if not more – support to those who are actively working to improve civil liberties in Belarus.

First step, of course, is education.

If you live in Ottawa or its environs, you will soon have an excellent opportunity for educating yourself about the situation in Belarus.  On th 25th of April, 2012, at 7 pm,  the Freethinking Film Society is going to host an information evening about Belarus at the National Archives Library in Ottawa, where they will be screening ‘Europe’s Last Tyrant’:

For those on the other side of the pond, it will also be screened at the London Film Festival on April 15, 2012 in Shortwave (10 Bermondsey Square, London SE1 3UN).  For ticket info, see here. (Sorry about the late notice – just found this out myself).

For the rest:  keep your eyes open for a screening in your area. This is not something we should remain ignorant about!

An ISP we all need!

Historically, ISPs have readily handed over subscriber info to ‘authorities’ for the asking – no waiting for a warrant or such silly concepts as ‘due process’.

Subscribers had no choice in the matter:  if you wanted to hook up to the internet, the pipeline was controlled by ISPs who all placed submissiveness to authorities above protecting the civil liberties of their subscribers.  Their subscription contracts made this clear – either waive your civil liberties or get your internet service from somebody else!

Except that this condition was in all the ISPs contracts, so that there was nobody else to go to!

So much for ‘free markets’…  When all the terms of service were – at least, in this respect – almost identical, there was no consumer choice:  no way to vote with your dollar.

When civil libertarians and privacy watchdogs pointed out how these ‘industry practices’ abrogate civil liberties of the consumers and that it may, in fact, be illegal, legislators quickly passed laws to permit it.

This, in effect, permits the ISPs to share content of your email (this might be a good time to check out HushMail), your web-surfing history – heck, they can even install key-loggers and pass all that information on to agents of ‘the State’.  Expectation of privacy?  What is this ‘privacy’ thing – this word no longer exist in the dictionary!

This is about to change.  If Nick Merrill has anything to say about it, that is!

From CNET News:

‘Merrill, 39, who previously ran a New York-based Internet provider, told CNET that he’s raising funds to launch a national “non-profit telecommunications provider dedicated to privacy, using ubiquitous encryption” that will sell mobile phone service, for as little as $20 a month, and Internet connectivity.

The ISP would not merely employ every technological means at its disposal, including encryption and limited logging, to protect its customers. It would also — and in practice this is likely more important — challenge government surveillance demands of dubious legality or constitutionality.’

Which is the thing we truly need!

So, some might say, what about the ‘baddies’?  What about organized crime or terrorists or child pornographers?  They will be the first to want to take advantage of this, would they not?

Of course:  but that is why we have the police forces. It is their job to ferret these ‘baddies’ out:  but, with great power comes great responsibility.

In the case of the police, this responsibility is checked by judicial oversight.  Sure, it is more legwork – but we know that humans nature is always the weakest link in the chain, and it precisely because of human nature that these checks and balances have been instituted, it is to make sure power is not abused that due process must be followed.  Knowing the police are not taking shortcuts will even make the public trust them more, making their jobs easier, instead of the growing distrust people have that police and/or other ‘authorities’ will abuse their position to our detriment.

When agents of the State are permitted to circumvent judicial oversight and what we consider to be ‘due process’ – whether by relaxing the standards so that this becomes ‘standard’ and ‘accepted’ practice (like government agents routinely asking for – and receiving – private information about someone from a third party without judicial oversight) or by passing laws that reduce the integrity of what constitutes ‘due process’ (oh, like, say, ‘The Patriot Act’), we all loose!

I, for one, escaped from a life in a police state. It pains me greatly so see our society move – slowly, but definitely – towards the type of state which I escaped from.

So – civil-liberties-mided, customer-privacy-focused ISP providers:  COME ON!  WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR YOU!

Do you ever have one of those days?

My car was late from getting its oil change.

Waiting customers get free coffee at the customer lounge.

I’m not used to drinking coffee…any more.

I waited a long time.

The coffee was free.

My son says that now, I sound like this:

 

Posted in Humour. Tags: . 1 Comment »

Can Volunteers Protect Communities?

When police officers patrol the streets, their right to do so does not derive from the State – it derives from the right of all citizens to protect their selves, family and property.  Just because we have permitted the police officers to perform these tasks on our behalf (as opposed to just their own individual behalf) does not, in any way, shape or form, abrogate both our right and our responsibility to also do so ourselves.

It is therefore with great sadness that I hear of incidents like ‘the Spiceman’, where a man who protected his family and property with a broom and tossed a handful of spices at his attacker was arrested by the police and charged with assault with a weapon and administering a noxious substance – while the original perp was not charged with anything.

While most commentators agree that it is ridiculous to suggest that the restaurateur did not have the right to protect his property, I would go further:  he not only had that right, he had the obligation to do so.  To do anything less would be an abdication of his civic responsibilities with respect to his fellow neighbours.

As for the actions of the police….don’t even get me started!  They have no problem trampling over the civil liberties of people who have not broken any laws (kettlin, anyone? – trap them all and not worry about any silly civil liberties), but repeated calls regarding property damage are simply ignored. (Or how about the frivolous dismissal of death threats against Tarek Fatah as he lay in a hospital bed?) That is abdication of their duties by the police officers on two different counts:  their professional duties as well as their basic citizenship duties.

And don’t even get me started on Caledonia!

Yet, we have been so trained to accept police officers’ dismissal of our complaints and concerns that we no longer question it.

I know that I no longer report minor theft or property damage to the police:  like, when my car got broken into last week and my purse got stolen.  (Luckily, my wallet was not in my purse – I like to keep a ‘packed’ back-up purse in my car as a ‘coping mechanism’ because I get forgetful and might need the stuff when I am out and about – but I would never leave my wallet/keys in an unattended car.  My purse just contains necessities:  a notepad/puzzles, 5-10 pens, some cyanoacrylate glue, change, mints/gum, a sewing kit, a couple of books, 1st aid kit – you know, necessities you should not leave home without.)  Since the last time the car was broken into, the cops’ attitude was ‘what do you want us to do about it?’, I really did not see the point in the hassle:  I would not benefit from reporting it and certainly no effective action would be taken if I did – so why waste the tax-money by reporting it?

While I don’t know how to fix this disconnect from, indifference to and, at times, open hostility towards the citizenry from our Police forces, it is important that we search for various ideas and examine their merit.  It is in this spirit that I would like to show you the following video:

Obviously, not a perfect solution.  But, it is thinking in the right direction….