An update on Mark Steyn

Mark Steyn’s struggles run well over a decade long and have been well covered on this blog. Now, we have an update – of sorts.

Mark Steyn is a Canadian journalist who is very intelligent, charismatic as well as eloquent.

And, deliciously sarcastic.

He got himself into trouble by criticizing ‘The Mann’ himself, an extremely litigious individual who is the author of the now long-debunked by (in 2004/2005 by McIntyre and McKitrick, if memory serves me correctly) ‘Hockey Stick Hoax’ that would turn any data entered into an ‘a Hockey Stick’ graph of ‘catastrophic climate change’ and that is still the basis of the current de-carbonization conspiracy that enriches many large businesses while lowering the living standards of human beings.

Twelve or so years in to the litigation (a punishment in itself), in the highly politicized D.C. area of Columbia in the USA (where the jury is suspected of being not exactly impartial), Mark Steyn was found to have caused $1.00 of actual damages to Dr. Mann – and then ordered to pay him $1,000,000.00 plus court costs anyways.

Well, here is an update to the story: not a win as such, but, perhaps a glimmer of a light.

Of course, not before the process caused Mark multiple heart attacks.

Mark Steyn is not the Only Canadian Michael Mann had sued, leading to him earning the colloquial term ‘Canuckaphobic’ up here in my neck of woods.

At least one of the subjects of his lawsuits, also a Canadian (Dr. Tim Ball), had been sued almost literally to death by Michael Mann. Let’s hope there is hope for Mark Steyn and for the future!

In the mean time, I present you with a musical classic: Hide the Decline!

Winston Marshall hosts James Lindsay on his show: long, but very interesting listen

Dr. James Lindsay is a Mathematician who, along with friends Helen Pluckrose and Dr. Peter Boghossian noticed that there was a marked lack of rigour and scientific method in highly regarded, peer-reviewed papers published on a particular part of the Social Sciences, derogatorily referred to a Grievance Studies. To see if they were correct, they wrote a number of bogus papers with very poor scientific methods and a lot of popular buzzwords and claims of the Grievance Studies.

Surprise surprise, their papers (like how dog-owners react to male-on-female humping vs male-on-male humping in dog parks and how these reactions ‘prove’ inherent sexism in our culture) began to be published and acclaimed. I actually remember some of these papers being papers being touted in mainstream media (MSM) and rolling my eyes – and it is a sad commentary that so many people accepted them as ‘science’ because they were ‘peer-reviewed’…because none of us quite realized that the ‘peers’ doing the ‘reviewing’ were not scientists but ideologues.

When what they thought were transparently fake and somewhat satirical papers began to be cited and nominated for scientific excellence awards, the trio pulled the plug on the project and revealed what they had done.

Perhaps some of my details of the story are fuzzy by the flow of time, but the major point remains.

Since then Dr. Lindsay has taken a deep dive into the world of Grievance Studies and what were the underlying principles that let to them and their open disdain in rejecting the scientific method and instead treating purely political screeds as ‘science’. He has gone to many primary sources and slugged through them, as well as some excellent analyst like Maj. Stephen Coughlin of Unconstrained Analytics. Here is one of Stephen Coughlin’s ‘briefs’:

Winston Marshall prides himself on being a banjo player in some band, but had to quit because he liked a book written by a journalist who was seriously injured by Antifa. Now, he has a wildly successful program here he interviews the greatest thinkers of our times and helps unlock the complexity of their arguments to those of us just learning about the topic can follow with ease – but they are complex topics.

For example, in the video below, James Lindsay and Winston Marshall delve into what is wokism (best explanation so far is that it is Critical Constructionist Epistemology, where the ‘way of knowing’ is constructed on the foundation of the Critical Theory as evolved from the original Frankfurt School teachings – yes, big words – but they really explain them) and the difference between the ‘woke right’ and the ‘woke left’ as well as the different flavours of conservatism and leftism/progressivism in our current political milieu and how the second coming of Donald Trump to the Presidency disrupts how the various groups are evolving.

It is only an hour-and-a-bit long, but is is distilled information that is made comprehensible and Winston Marshall asks all the questions I would have asked for clarification when the wording got too technical.

Warning: James Lindsay – in any of his videos/podcasts/interviews will stretch your mind. But, Winston Marshall is such a skilled interviewer, he makes it enjoyable.

So, please, do enjoy this video:

Monotheism vs Monolatry

This is a bit of a technical – is that the right term? – musing.

Monotheism is the belief that there is only one God.

Monolatry is the worship of only one God to the exclusion of all the others.

It is my proposition that Abrahamic religions are all a form of Monolatry and not at all Monotheism.

Abrahamic religions typically include Judaism, Christianity and Islam. There may be other off-shoots, but these three are the big ones – three of the main world religions.

So, let’s start at the beginning:

Jews made a pact with a specific God, Jehova: they will worship him exclusively and he will make them prosperous.

That is actually in the Ten Commandments: Thou shall have no other Gods before me.

OK – that clearly defines that the primary loyalty is to this particular God, but does not in any way state that this is the only God, nor does it prohibit a secondary worship of any other God(s).

In other words, it is a statement of loyalty. It is in no way a declaration of monotheism.

Islam is a bit stickier, but, please, do bear with me.

Laat and her sisters were, at one point, declared by Mohammed to be the daughters of Allah – Satanic verses and all that. So, some people argue that these verses may not have been dictated to Mohammed by Satan because he did not originally recognize any difference between these verses and the verses dictated to him by the Angel messenger of Allah.

Very controversial, so, let’s set it aside.

It has been decades since I have studied this and the easily accessible links are, well, burried too deep. But, there is a point in The Sunnah where Mohammed is said to have said that ‘Christians and Jews worship the same God – WE worship the other one’.

That is why they differentiate themselves, having a beard without a mustache, men sitting down to pee and a host of other ways to differentiate Muslims from Christians and Jews.

And this states that Islam (even if we omit the daughters of Allah) is not Monotheism but, at least, Duotheism.

Of course, I do acknowledge that there may, indeed , be monotheistic religions.

Sikhism comes to mind – but, Sikhism is an artificial religion.

It arose as Muslim armies were invading Hindu India. The king who ruled the kingdom which turned out to be a buffer-state between the Islamic invasion and the Hindu kingdoms. Having learned that Muslims would not kill monotheists, he took drastic action: he went on a hunger strike.

At the time, it was the custom of Hindu men in this kingdom to wear a ‘string’, a thin sashe, over one shoulder (think Miss Universe sashe type thing, but thinner). This king sat on one platform of a balance scale, fasting, until men of his kingdom placed their sashes on the other platform of the scale to signal they had rejected Hinduism and accepted monotheistic Sikhism…he sat there, fasting, until the weight of the sashes balanced his own.

Then, they could oppose the Muslim invaders as Monotheists and earn better terms: this was a political move, a loyalty test, and in no way a religious monotheistic belief system.

Source: I went to my local Gurdwara and let the elders teach me the history of their faith.

In conclusion: all Abrahamic faiths are all forms of monolatry, NOT monotheism. Sikhism is a political ideology in its inception, not a religious one.

I do not know of any religions that seek the nomicker ‘monotheistic’ whose doctrine actually supports this claim. If you know of some, please, do let me know and I will research it and repot back to you.

Please, do let me know your thoughts!

A Most Excellent Post – Censored from reddit

Yes, this site has been dormant for way too long.

This is because I have been very busy with working to achieve the goals promoted by this site from its inception through alternate means.  And, I have been doing some serious ‘growing up’ in the process.  But more on that later…

Today, I came across a post on reddit that I found most illuminating.  However, between when I first clicked on it and the time I was ready to comment on it, it had been censored.

Deleted.

Disappeared.

Gone down the ‘memory hole’…

Whatever the metaphor, it was made gone – as if the book-burners had had their way with it.

And so, my friends, with the permission of the author (a redditor by the name of ‘istillgetreallybored’), I bring you the banished, censored and book-burned post:

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE (this reee is dedicated in part to the cucked pedes who think they are alpha just because they voted for Trump)

They have to go back. Trump has reduced ISIS from 35k to 1k and the migrant crisis was a fraud to instigate a replacement program to further economic marxism as a means to controlling humans. We should have been helping (not causing the crisis would have been best) them in their country of origin which would have resulted in 100 fold cost savings and prevented this assimilation issue.

Islam does not recognize borders. Wake up.

For those who don’t have freeee speech.

The heart-war —- and that is the lowest form of the war. And it is that the Muslim should believe in his heart that the infidels are enemies to him and to his religion, and that he should desire their disappearance and the destruction of their power. And no Muslim can be imagined who is not under obligation to this degree of the war. Verily all the people of the Faith are under obligation to this amount without any question whatever, in whatever place they may be and in whatsoever condition they may be found. And that those concerning whom the exception made in the verse presented in the saying of the Most High holds good (You should abstain from them completely) to these it is permitted that they should be satisfied with this degree of the heart-war.3

Dr. Jordan Peterson’s lecture in Ottawa, 11th of March, 2017 – with intro by Mrs. Tammy Peterson

Act! For Canada’s Ottawa chapter brought the iconic Dr. Jordan Peterson to speak at the main branch of the Ottawa Library.

And, luckily, we got Mrs. Tammy Peterson (a powerful intellect and personality in her own right) to give us a glimpse into how their lives have been altered since Dr. Peterson’s pro-free-speech rant went viral in 2016:

 

 

Q&A videos to come as they are published.

For the record:  Dr. Peterson WILL go down in the history books as THE Socrates/Aristotle/St. Thomas of Aquinas/Jan Hus/Gogol/Jung/Nietzsche+++ of our era – all rolled into one.

Just saying…

…but history will prove me right.

He will have turned out to be THE most influential thinker of our era.  That much I am certain about.

Mildly interesting: A Longitudinal Measurement Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

Not important, nor urgent, but very entertaining:

The discussion board site 4chan has been a part of the Internet’s dark underbelly since its creation, in 2003, by ‘moot’ (Christopher Poole). But recent events have brought it under the spotlight, making it a central figure in the outlandish 2016 US election campaign, with its links to the “alt-right” movement and its rhetoric of hate and racism. However, although 4chan is increasingly “covered” by the mainstream media, we know little about how it actually operates and how instrumental it is in spreading hate on other social platforms. A new study, with colleagues at UCL, Telefonica, and University of Rome now sheds light on 4chan and in particular, on /pol/, the “politically incorrect” board.

Scientists study 4chan – learn important lessons!

What the great late Christopher Hitchens said about the last set of Muhammad cartoons

More relevant today than ever!

http://youtu.be/LZZ96SArpuc

Prescient words of wisdom…

The Jihad of Words

In the words of the one and only Inigo Montoya:

Or, if you are more into classical music:

“Because, you know, sometimes words have two meanings…”

It is impossible to hold a meaningful conversation with somebody when you both think you know what the words you are using mean, but in reality, you each subscribe to a completely different meaning of that word.

For example, the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood government that had come to power in Egypt following the ‘Arab Spring’ was lead by Morsi’s party, which was called the ‘Freedom and Justice Party’.

Muslim Brotherhood = Freedom and Justice?

Why, yes – if you mean what the Islamists understand these words to mean.

‘Freedom’, according to Koranic sources, is defined as ‘freedom from the laws of men’.  In other words, being ruled by the word god, Allah, alone.

In other words, they understand the word ‘freedom’ to mean the implementation of the Sharia and Sharia alone.

And ‘justice’?

‘Justice’ according to laws of God and God alone:  again, Sharia.

In these people’s mind, the way we use the words ‘freedom’ and ‘justice’ is a perversion of their true meaning (Sharia and only Sharia) and we are ‘spreading mischief’ by perverting these words.

And under Sharia, the penalty for ‘spreading mischief’ is death.

A simple way to tell a moderate Muslim from an Islamist is to ask their view on whether Sharia should be implemented in the West.

If they say no, they are here because they are attempting to flee the horrors of life under Sharia and we must do our utmost to protect them, because they will be the first victims of the Islamists.  Many are afraid to speak out, for very real fear that relatives stuck in Islamic countries would be harmed for their words:  Islam is a clan-based culture where you are often held responsible for your relatives actions.

If they say yes, then they are an Islamist who is advocating, in no uncertain terms, the elevation of SHaria above our own laws.  This is treason and our societies must treat it as such.  All advocates of Sharia in the West must be arrested and charged with treason, because that is what trying to replace our laws with Sharia is.

Following is an excellent video.  It is a bit longer than what I usually post, but it is most excellent:

http://youtu.be/FdjEFte8d_M

Islam, Satire and Death

CATO Institute: “Freedom from Speech” on College Campuses (Greg Lukianoff)

I’m a big fan of FIRE and Greg Lukianoff.  I hope this interview will show you why: