Catching up…

So much is happening in the world around us, it is difficult for me to keep up with all the things worthy of being brought to your attention – especially when others are doing such an awesome job of it.

Still, here are a few things that are worth reading:

The lack separation of church and state in Louisiana leads to multiple death threats against a high school student.  No religion or religious law must be permitted to trump secular laws – no matter what!  Otherwise, innocent people – like this kid – will suffer.

On a brighter note, Kaffir Kanuck gets a tour of Sun Studios from Ezra Levant.

Binks publishes his latest roundup.

And more from BCF….and Kaffir Kanuck…and The Sharpe Stick

…let’s not forget young Walker, either!

‘The cult of Apple’ confirmed through fMRI

‘Religion’ is more than just a set of world-views.

There is a significant amount of evidence that some humans are ‘wired’ for religiosity:  that their brains are ‘built’ so that their need for religious beliefs, practices and experiences is as physical as their other ‘human’ needs. This is why ‘religious belief’ is not an entirely voluntary thing…

‘Religiosity’ is a forseeable result of our social evolution – a feedback-loop, if you will, making it possible for humans to live in ‘unnaturaly’ large groups with top-down rules administered by an authority figure with minimal requrement for physical enforcement.  Rules are essential for the functioning of early human societies:  the individuals with the greater religiosity needs would submit to an authority figure’s rules through religiously-motivated self regulation.  By reducing the need for social regulation through physical punishment, the authority figure is enabled to exert a great deal of control without the kind of revolt a physical enforcement of oppressive or invasive (or both) rules would elicit.

(Aside:  OK – perhaps a better explanation is needed – but I do not want to go off on a huge tangent.  So, let me be brief:

  • our brains are capable of fully conceptualizing around 150 people – our ‘monkeyshpere’ – which is the ‘natural’ size of a human social group
  • when we began to live in groups larger than our monkeysphere, we needed ‘social rules’ to govern our interactions with other members of our group, since we could not ‘know and care about’ each and every one in our group
  • ‘religiosity’ is one of the evolutionary mechanisms through which this process is achieved)

Though many people are curiously resistant to the idea, ‘religions’ do not necessarily contain dogma about any deities, or afterlife, or any such concepts. Anthropologists and sociologists will confirm that in the past as well as in the present times, the one thing all religions share is belief is ‘powerful forces’ – whether these be physical or not. (‘God’ is just one paricular incarnation of these ‘powerful forces’.)

To paraphrase C. G. Jung, religions are concerned with things (including ideas and principles) that we believe important, powerful or beautiful enough to be recognized and or worshipped.

The following bit of news from Digital Trends therefore does not come as much of a surprise:

…Previously, the scientists had studied the brains of those of religious faith, and they found that, as Riley puts it: “The Apple products are triggering the same bits of [Brooks’ [‘an Apple devotee’s’]] brain as religious imagery triggers in a person of faith.”

“This suggests that the big tech brands have harnessed, or exploit, the brain areas that have evolved to process religion,” one of the scientists says.”

Which, really, really, really makes sense.

Pat Condell: ‘You’ll turn to God’

Vlad Tepes on Geert Wilders

I realize this is coming a little later, my apologies.  Going out to see Geert Wilders live was so exciting, it has taken me a few days to regroup…

Vlad Tepes has posted some excellent videos.  Here is his interview with Geert Wilders.

Here is BCF’s Toronto take.

Geert Wilders and Ezra Levant at the National Arts Centre

Just came home from the National Arts Centre in Ottawa from an evening with Geert Wilders.

Ezra Levant  introduced him in his wonderful, bigger-than-life style.

The next speaker was a most excellent, engaging speaker – and, thanks to Kaffir Kanuck who ‘jogged my memory, I can now tell you his name.  It was none other than Rabbi Jonathon Hausman, who came up from Boston for the event, and he shared his experiences with Islam and the dhimmitude of our elected officials and the government bureaucrats, south of the border.  His speech was prepared and delivered very well indeed – too bad the content told of so many sad and, yes, tragic things.

Then came the highlight of the evenig – Geert Wilders!

What can I say about it?

It was classical Wilders – we have all heard him speak or read his words.  So, it was not unfamiliar territory!  But, hearing him speak those words in person felt like being part of history…

During the short Q&A afterwards, I was most happy that he got asked about the one thing he is most infamously misquoted on:  thecall for banning of the Koran…  And, Geert Wilders DID get a chance to clarify exactly what his position is!!!

Though he is very often quoted as saying that the Koran should be banned, he has never said such a thing!

Rather, we are dealing with an ‘IFF’ siuation here.

‘IFF’ – for those who are not familiar with the expression – stands for ‘IF AND ONLY IF’.

In the Neatherlands, Hitler’s infamous book ‘Mein Kampf’ (which, by the way, translates as ‘My Jihad’) was outlawed under that country’s hate laws.   All Wilders did was stand up and say to the legislators:

  1. IF you have used your power to outlaw ‘Mein Kampf’ on the grounds that it contains anti-semitic hate speech
  2. THEN you have to outlaw other books that have anti-semitic hate speech that is just as strong, if not stronger
  3. The Koran is such a book:  therefore
  4. IF you ban one, you MUST ban both
  5. Otherwise you must not ban either!

In other words – if and ONLY if!

This is not a demand for the Koran to be banned:  it is a demand that laws be applied the same way, to everyone.

Not only is this stand moral and principled, it can be interpreted as ‘anti-banning-anything’!

Again, this is not a demand to ban the Koran – it is calling out of the moral relativism that applies laws selectively and a shaming of those who partake in it!

Geert Wilders truly is a hero!

Update:  thanks to Kaffir Kanuck, the name of one of the speakers was added.

What is it with religious people and outrage over pictures?

Just to be thorough, let’s look at religions other than Christianity and Islam – for once.

Most religions come in many forms – from relatively liberal ones to insanely fundamentalist ones.  While I am willing to have respect for some religious practices (as long as they are strictly self-imposed by adult individuals), it is a serious mistake for a society to give a ‘carte blanche’ of ‘respect’ to all things religious.

Just because something is ‘religious’ does not automatically make it worthy of respect.

For example, there is a Hasidic Jewish sect living in New York which is so misogynistic, it forbids any and all photographs of women.

(To their credit – the women within this sect/cult have chosen to not hold a driver’s license rather than have their picture taken.  This is way more respectable than demanding that society accommodate them with a no-photo driver’s license, as some religious cults have done.)

This group puts out a ‘newspaper’ called ‘Der Zeitung’.

In this newspaper, they have published the now famous photo of Obama, Biden, Hillary Clinton and a bunch of other people ‘watching’ as the seals storm Osama’s hideout and kill him.  The catch is – they have removed from the picture the image of the two women present:  Hillary Clinton and Audrey Tomason (a staffer in the background).

Why?

“Because of laws of modesty, we are not allowed to publish pictures of women, and we regret if this gives an impression of disparaging to women, which is certainly never our intention,” the Der Zeitung statement said.

Yes: to these religionists, ‘modesty‘ is more important than the truth!!!

Shame, shame, shame, shame!

This type of religion does not deserve respect – to the contrary.  Giving it even a pretense of respect is an offense to us, our culture and our laws.  It is no better than radical Islam or radical Christianity or radical facsism/communism/whatever-ism!!!

Now, let’s leave radical fundamentalist Judaism behind and turn our attention to Hinduism:  the religion that brought us ‘the suicide belt’ and pioneered the use of women in suicide bombings

Many Hindus are reportedly ‘outraged’ over a picture of the goddess Laksmi.

Noe, I am not a Hindu, nor am I an expert on Lakshmi – but I am a little bit familiar with her and her worship.  A friend of mine worships Lakshmi.  A few years ago, when one of ther daughters (roughly my age – a scientist with similar interest and personality to me) suddenly died, I stood in for her during a Laksmi-worshippping ceremony which my friend and her daughters had been planning before the sad event.  So, I have learned a little bit about Lakshmi in particular…  I rather like Lakshmi – think wise and loving and tolerant Shakti.

Which is why I was so surprised when so many Hindus were offended by pictures of Lakshmi – on swimwear!

Lakshmi is the goddess of wisdom and fortune and sharing and female sexuality!  A skimpy bathing suit is a perfect place for an icarnation of her image!  It is a uniquely empowering place for this particular goddess to appear!  Well, at least according to my admittedly limited knowledge of Lakshmi…

Still, even if it were not it good taste – which I think it was:  I do love that swimsuit! – Lakshmi is the goddess both of being charitable and of wisdom.  The designer meant well – she honestly thought she was honouring the goddess by including her image in her collection.  Lakshmi is also the goddess of material gain – both helping one earn it as well as guiding one on how to be charitable and perform charitable works.  The key is – she IS the goddess to pray to if you wish to make money….

Yet, those who are outraged say:

Lakshmi was meant to be worshipped in temples or home shrines and not for pushing swimwear in fashion shows for mercantile greed of an apparel company, Zed argued.

Dude!

She is the goddess of making money!!!

And of wisdom and understanding – so she would ‘get’ the good intent behind the bathing suit!

Plus, she is the goddess of beauty and channeling feminine powe!!!

All this makes me wonder if religionists can be trusted to even understand their own religions!  Rather, it seems to me that they wish to use it as a tool of coersion, to get power for themselves over others!

This face of ‘religion’ is definitely not worthy of ANY respect – EVER!

Pat Condell: ‘Justice for Osama’

Ezra Levant: Bell’s bold bias

Hear it and weep!

This is what happens with government over-regulation.

Bell Canada provides cable/satellite channels to its subscribers.  It does so with a license from the Government agency, CRTC.

Bell Canada also owns and operates CTV – a news network.  It does this also with a license from the CRTC.

Rather than making it available by choice, however, the CRTC has decreed that every cable/satelite provider MUST carry the CTV news channel. and must make it available to its subscribers as part of the ‘basic’ package (the channels are bundled – a Canadian is not permitted to simply pay for the channels she wants, we can only buy a couple of ‘bundles’ of channels).  In other words, if a Canadian wishes to get cable/satellite TV, she MUST purchase Bell’s news channel. CTV – along with the government’s own channel, the CBC.

A new news channel started up:  Sun TV.  They are licensed by the same CRTC to operate in Canada and must adhere to its standards.

UPDATE:  I have replaced the original end of my post with this link to better researched details of what is going on.

H/T:  BCF

DU: Christianne Amanpour said Osama bin Laden lived in a villa in Pakistan 3 years ago

Well, well, well!

I guess bin Laden’s locations wasn’t such a secret…

And nobody had to waterboard her for it, or anything!

Posted in society. Tags: , . 3 Comments »

No end of Dhimmitude…

I am sorry,  but this is just wrong!

It is disrespectful – and wrong.

For the US to actually provide Osama bin Ladin’s body with the proper Islamic burrial is not just wrong, it is actively immoral!

It will prolong the fighting and cause many more deaths in the long run.

Of course, it is wrong to give respect where it is not due.  Doing so diminishes respect which is earned.  As such, Osama bin Ladin did not deserve respect – in life or in death.

Plus – when somebody orders the extrajudicial execution of another human being, that ‘respect’ train has long left the station…

But, ‘respect’ is a key issue here:  showing ‘respect’ by following Sharia in having a Muslim perform all the ‘proper’ Islamic burrial rites is a serious, serious mistake for the Obama administration to have made.  Perhaps serious enough to undo the good of having finally captured the little bugger.

Why?

It sends the wrong signal – the head of the only world Superpower is submitting to Sharia.

America is submitting to Sharia!

It sends theunmistakable message to the Islamists that they are succeeding – that we are, slowly but surely, accepting our role of Dhimmis!

That they only have to push a little longer, a little harder, and all of us will submit – because we have already started to…

Judging by Obama’s actions, they just might be right….

Posted in society. Tags: , . 3 Comments »